Of course it is spinning, but very slowly. Only turns once every 24 hours (about 0.0007 rpm). The effect of that is imperceptible. We are "glued" to the surface by gravity, in every direction. That is the nature of gravity (a centripetal force). Same as with other planets. You don't really have a good handle on what is possible or impossible.
No mechanism for gravity has ever been proven. With the electric force, they describe a specific subatomic interaction. With gravity, they say ‘we don’t know why’. How can something attract something millions or billions of light years away? Oh, right, I forgot, by ‘bending space time’. Space time? The what now? What exactly is space time? Oh, it’s the ,very fabric of the universe’. And how do objects bend it?
Gravity is like when you sit on a bed and loose stuff on it is attracted to your bottom; they move over to you. Well, it's like that with the Earth, but the impression the bottom (Earth) makes with the bed (space) is an all-around 3D one; loose bodies (the moon, asteroids, etc) are attracted to it. A heavier bottom (the Sun) will attract more loose things (planets, asteroids, moons, etc). This is a gravity well.
The "mechanism" for gravity is no more or less explained than the "mechanism" for electric charge, the essence of which is still unknown. We have a theory to relate the effects of electric and magnetic fields. We also have a theory to describe the effects of a gravitational field; it is called orbital mechanics, the force and acceleration between two (or more) objects of mass. Frederick Kantor had an information-based theory of gravity, but I read his book a long time ago and can't recall the details.
You don't like "spacetime" and bending? Neither do I. So what? Bad theory does not displace existing observational reality.
High probability that “gravity” is actually describing a magnetic field. The equations even show its strength dropping as a square function of the distance just like a field equation (see wi-fi signal strength equation). Mass is likely related to the strength of the attractive EM field so this is likely how they are disguising it: https://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Force-of-Gravity
Well, that's not how a magnetic field varies, since they are not spherically symmetric and only affect moving charges. You are thinking of an electric field, which is also a conservative force field. Mass is related to the number of protons and neutrons (and electrons, but they are fluff) in the nuclei of the matter under consideration.
Not in the least. For you to say so makes you a nitwit. I don't like being slandered and I have no compunctions about clearly identifying you for what you are.
Of course it is spinning, but very slowly. Only turns once every 24 hours (about 0.0007 rpm). The effect of that is imperceptible. We are "glued" to the surface by gravity, in every direction. That is the nature of gravity (a centripetal force). Same as with other planets. You don't really have a good handle on what is possible or impossible.
No mechanism for gravity has ever been proven. With the electric force, they describe a specific subatomic interaction. With gravity, they say ‘we don’t know why’. How can something attract something millions or billions of light years away? Oh, right, I forgot, by ‘bending space time’. Space time? The what now? What exactly is space time? Oh, it’s the ,very fabric of the universe’. And how do objects bend it?
Gravity is like when you sit on a bed and loose stuff on it is attracted to your bottom; they move over to you. Well, it's like that with the Earth, but the impression the bottom (Earth) makes with the bed (space) is an all-around 3D one; loose bodies (the moon, asteroids, etc) are attracted to it. A heavier bottom (the Sun) will attract more loose things (planets, asteroids, moons, etc). This is a gravity well.
https://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/space-environment/3-whats-a-gravity-well.html
The "mechanism" for gravity is no more or less explained than the "mechanism" for electric charge, the essence of which is still unknown. We have a theory to relate the effects of electric and magnetic fields. We also have a theory to describe the effects of a gravitational field; it is called orbital mechanics, the force and acceleration between two (or more) objects of mass. Frederick Kantor had an information-based theory of gravity, but I read his book a long time ago and can't recall the details.
You don't like "spacetime" and bending? Neither do I. So what? Bad theory does not displace existing observational reality.
High probability that “gravity” is actually describing a magnetic field. The equations even show its strength dropping as a square function of the distance just like a field equation (see wi-fi signal strength equation). Mass is likely related to the strength of the attractive EM field so this is likely how they are disguising it: https://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Force-of-Gravity
Well, that's not how a magnetic field varies, since they are not spherically symmetric and only affect moving charges. You are thinking of an electric field, which is also a conservative force field. Mass is related to the number of protons and neutrons (and electrons, but they are fluff) in the nuclei of the matter under consideration.
Says the guy who believes satanists.
Not in the least. For you to say so makes you a nitwit. I don't like being slandered and I have no compunctions about clearly identifying you for what you are.