Well, you see the moon landing as fake because you are ignorant and paranoid. I'm curious: were you old enough to be alive when it happened? Or is this all a Sour Grapes episode that something cool like this might have happened before you were alive, but not while you are alive?
where is the curve? if you can't see past the fake moon landing..
they try and find the formula for the curvature of the earth
i ask because IT DOESN'T EXIST ..
there for i need not have been alive to be brainwashed as well as all those who went thru it appear to be.
i personally think it was the incredible sense of accomplishment you guys are unwilling to let go of.
of course of the reasons i can't accept the moon landing is the fact we LOST THE high-quality version of the moon landing video.
just lost it. then australia was like hey NASA we have a copy
NASA was like, cool, give it to us
then promptly destroyed it as well.
you can't explain such behavior by NASA, but i can
oh, and they also lost the SATURN V rocket planes. the thing we spent billions creating... that those involved say was never completed.. and now they are just gone
literally the crown jewel of the space program.. supposedly 'lost'
i think ya'll believe in some pretty unbelievably bad lies
What do you mean "formula for the curvature of the Earth"? If you mean the radius of the Earth, it is about 6,378 km and describes the circular profile and spherical area of the Earth. Easy formulas. I'm sure you can look them up.
It seems in your case, there might not have been much to wash.
The Saturn V went out of production. If you want to see one in the flesh, go to the Huntsville, Alabama space museum, standing tall and proud next to a last-of-its-kind Space Shuttle. Not supposedly "lost"---entirely lost. You don't appreciate that technology is perishable. Nor do we know how to cast turrets for battleships or make 12-inch naval guns. All lost to time and tide. Not all information is written down. Written records are finally thrown in the trash. Experts die. What you seem to believe in is a fairy tale where people don't die, memories are not forgotten, and information is never lost. That has no relationship to reality. You need to become an adult and grow up.
What do you mean "formula for the curvature of the Earth"?
you know, that formula you would use to calculated microwave towers given the curve over (x) miles
this is NOT actually done. but it is an example of what would be done, if the earth where in fact curved
microwaves travel straight, and towers are placed at the same height, based upon sea level and point them at each other. (just one more proof for the lack of a curve)
Easy formulas. I'm sure you can look them up.
be the first to find it! nobody else can. show me who uses it...
What you seem to believe in is a fairy tale where people don't die, memories are not forgotten, and information is never lost.
whatever you say champ. seems to me there are many opinions (as to why we can't/haven't build one again), but mostly clouded bullshit that leads to the same conclusion..
it can't be done.. or it can but nobody wants to spend the money on it
That has no relationship to reality.
i can smell bullshit, and the moonlanding reeks of it. if you can't smell it.. perhaps you are paid not to? probably the most disingenious thing NASA does is employ dipshits to spread their lies. folks just can't believe that a trillion dollar lie, and i get that is 'the rub'
but you take a step back, you see footprints in soft dust.. that dust couldn't possibly be there after a rocket landing. any and all small debris would have been sent flying
but alas, all this trivia is most likely too subtle for you.
Regarding microwave towers, if the towers are at the same height and they point at each other, the elevation angle of the beam centerline at each tower will be slightly negative to account for Earth curvature. Very small angle. Probably well within the error budget of the alignment. (It looks like they use phased arrays, so there is no mechanical pointing, just a reach-out-and-grab approach.)
You can't prove anything with microwave towers. I could glue two pencil stubs to the surface of a basket ball and string a line from the tip of one stub to the tip of the other stub. Just like a microwave link.
What is your problem with microwave towers? Earth curvature must figure into the problem at large distances. It does with radar and air-to-air microwave communication. Along with atmospheric refraction. I did this for a living. You are talking through your hat.
curcumference of a circle = pi x (radius)^2
area of a sphere = 4pi x (radius)^2
This is elementary geometry. Only the profoundly ignorant do not know or use this. (If you want the x & y coordinates of a circle, talk to a 9th grader who has taken analytical geometry. In polar coordinates it is a radius R across 2pi steradians of angle.)
Forbes is not an expert publication in rocket propulsion. According to NASA, the STS will be a "replacement" for the Saturn V. Informed technical opinion projects it will be canceled for budgetary reasons---and because Space X's Starship will surpass its performance and schedule. Supposedly, the Space Shuttle was its "replacement," but it, too, is dead.
Smelling bullshit about the moon landing is the unfortunate effect of sheer ignorance being inserted in place of "common sense." You can't substantiate any of it. I've heard all the bullshit arguments, and all they are is ignorant failure to understand photography, gravity, and other phenomena unique to the Moon. Footprints in soft dust. For one thing, it wasn't that soft, as the astronauts found out afterward. It was very hard and gritty. For another thing, the environment was vacuum and the rocket exhaust expanded to very low pressure over a very short distance. There is no reason to think the dust might have been moved, if it were out of the exhaust plume. You are thinking of the effects that would occur if there had been an atmosphere to carry the momentum of the exhaust---but since there is no atmosphere on the Moon, that didn't happen. But alas, this fact of physics, is likely too subtle for you.
Another "what" question? Suppose you tell me. Suppose you establish that any such thing happened. I take this as a concession that you were not there to witness anything, since you don't want to admit your age.
Well, you see the moon landing as fake because you are ignorant and paranoid. I'm curious: were you old enough to be alive when it happened? Or is this all a Sour Grapes episode that something cool like this might have happened before you were alive, but not while you are alive?
where is the curve? if you can't see past the fake moon landing..
they try and find the formula for the curvature of the earth
i ask because IT DOESN'T EXIST ..
there for i need not have been alive to be brainwashed as well as all those who went thru it appear to be.
i personally think it was the incredible sense of accomplishment you guys are unwilling to let go of.
of course of the reasons i can't accept the moon landing is the fact we LOST THE high-quality version of the moon landing video.
just lost it. then australia was like hey NASA we have a copy
NASA was like, cool, give it to us
then promptly destroyed it as well.
you can't explain such behavior by NASA, but i can
oh, and they also lost the SATURN V rocket planes. the thing we spent billions creating... that those involved say was never completed.. and now they are just gone
literally the crown jewel of the space program.. supposedly 'lost'
i think ya'll believe in some pretty unbelievably bad lies
What do you mean "formula for the curvature of the Earth"? If you mean the radius of the Earth, it is about 6,378 km and describes the circular profile and spherical area of the Earth. Easy formulas. I'm sure you can look them up.
It seems in your case, there might not have been much to wash.
The Saturn V went out of production. If you want to see one in the flesh, go to the Huntsville, Alabama space museum, standing tall and proud next to a last-of-its-kind Space Shuttle. Not supposedly "lost"---entirely lost. You don't appreciate that technology is perishable. Nor do we know how to cast turrets for battleships or make 12-inch naval guns. All lost to time and tide. Not all information is written down. Written records are finally thrown in the trash. Experts die. What you seem to believe in is a fairy tale where people don't die, memories are not forgotten, and information is never lost. That has no relationship to reality. You need to become an adult and grow up.
you know, that formula you would use to calculated microwave towers given the curve over (x) miles
this is NOT actually done. but it is an example of what would be done, if the earth where in fact curved
microwaves travel straight, and towers are placed at the same height, based upon sea level and point them at each other. (just one more proof for the lack of a curve)
be the first to find it! nobody else can. show me who uses it...
here is forbes saying 'we lost ability to travel to moon
here is a list of reasons we can't build a rocket
whatever you say champ. seems to me there are many opinions (as to why we can't/haven't build one again), but mostly clouded bullshit that leads to the same conclusion..
it can't be done.. or it can but nobody wants to spend the money on it
i can smell bullshit, and the moonlanding reeks of it. if you can't smell it.. perhaps you are paid not to? probably the most disingenious thing NASA does is employ dipshits to spread their lies. folks just can't believe that a trillion dollar lie, and i get that is 'the rub'
but you take a step back, you see footprints in soft dust.. that dust couldn't possibly be there after a rocket landing. any and all small debris would have been sent flying
but alas, all this trivia is most likely too subtle for you.
Regarding microwave towers, if the towers are at the same height and they point at each other, the elevation angle of the beam centerline at each tower will be slightly negative to account for Earth curvature. Very small angle. Probably well within the error budget of the alignment. (It looks like they use phased arrays, so there is no mechanical pointing, just a reach-out-and-grab approach.)
You can't prove anything with microwave towers. I could glue two pencil stubs to the surface of a basket ball and string a line from the tip of one stub to the tip of the other stub. Just like a microwave link.
What is your problem with microwave towers? Earth curvature must figure into the problem at large distances. It does with radar and air-to-air microwave communication. Along with atmospheric refraction. I did this for a living. You are talking through your hat.
curcumference of a circle = pi x (radius)^2 area of a sphere = 4pi x (radius)^2 This is elementary geometry. Only the profoundly ignorant do not know or use this. (If you want the x & y coordinates of a circle, talk to a 9th grader who has taken analytical geometry. In polar coordinates it is a radius R across 2pi steradians of angle.)
Forbes is not an expert publication in rocket propulsion. According to NASA, the STS will be a "replacement" for the Saturn V. Informed technical opinion projects it will be canceled for budgetary reasons---and because Space X's Starship will surpass its performance and schedule. Supposedly, the Space Shuttle was its "replacement," but it, too, is dead.
Smelling bullshit about the moon landing is the unfortunate effect of sheer ignorance being inserted in place of "common sense." You can't substantiate any of it. I've heard all the bullshit arguments, and all they are is ignorant failure to understand photography, gravity, and other phenomena unique to the Moon. Footprints in soft dust. For one thing, it wasn't that soft, as the astronauts found out afterward. It was very hard and gritty. For another thing, the environment was vacuum and the rocket exhaust expanded to very low pressure over a very short distance. There is no reason to think the dust might have been moved, if it were out of the exhaust plume. You are thinking of the effects that would occur if there had been an atmosphere to carry the momentum of the exhaust---but since there is no atmosphere on the Moon, that didn't happen. But alas, this fact of physics, is likely too subtle for you.
Also it sounds like the person needs to travel around the world and check things out.
What was Stanley Kubrick doing at a military base with a “studio” in June of 1968?
Another "what" question? Suppose you tell me. Suppose you establish that any such thing happened. I take this as a concession that you were not there to witness anything, since you don't want to admit your age.