Or just give it up as a lost cause. Centuries of science and exploration has proven the Earth to be "spherical" to a high degree. There are no inexplicable features. And Australia is not upside down (of course).
Please explain why a satellite photograph would not show a picture on its side or upside down. I struggle with the concept that we are spinning at 1000mph+, Elipses Orbiting at 67000 mph and hurtling through space at 500, 000 mph. All the planets moons etc keeping near perfect time with us. Of course I also wonder why if the sun is 90+ million miles away, temp is 10,000f (BTW a plasma metal cutter is 40,000f) traveling through Negative 430f tempature, the rays warm/radiate/Planck through uv/molecular heat the earth. I wonder why you can see Chicago across lake MI. 53 or so miles away. Should be on the other side of the curve. I am not saying the world is flat, round. Or Taco shaped. I am saying they lie and they don't know either.
You haven't looked at enough satellite images, for one thing. Struggle all you want. Why are you struggling? The rotation is a tiny rate. Figure it out for yourself, instead of struggling in dumb wonder. We have no capability to sense speed, as anyone can realize by flying in a jet airplane at 600+ mph. Not so far from 1000 mph, right?
For most of your other questions, read a textbook on astronomy. (Space has no temperature, by the way.)
As for Chicago across the lake, that is an effect of atmospheric refraction. It is a general effect, but can be stronger when there is a temperature distribution cold at the surface, warming with height, as might be true of water over a lake.
Read the encylopedia. Obtain some learning! It is not all lies. "They" (whoever they are) are not everywhere, pen in hand, writing everything. We knew all about the Earth and Moon before there was ever a NASA. The only thing that NASA contributed was passage to the Moon and the opportunity to make better measurements.
If you don't know any truth, you are simply lost---by your own choice.
I'm trying to be civil and kind. 1. Is not true due to the fact that a flight on an airplane 1hr east and west (without head/tailwind produces the same distance. 2. Temp: According to the people who mislead you space has a temp of approx -450 degrees f. https://www.space.com/14719-spacekids-temperature-outer-space.html
3. Chicago: that lie has been debunked because refractions hold fast to the visual horizon they sit upon. Think mirage on a desert sand. Also I can show you testing (if you wish) of a laser beam traveling miles across a flat lake, this being impossible as laser shoot straight. You say it's not all lies. I won't put words in your mouth. Nasa gets approx 68 million a day. That money means alot to them and possibly others. I wish you peace, and apologize if I have offended you, and ask you forgiveness. https://youtu.be/qniCs03t3GM
My point about airplane flight is that when you are aboard, you have no perception of speed. You are aware that the atmosphere is "fixed" relative to the Earth's surface? It's all carried along. Do the numbers. (Can you do the numbers?) Sit on a playground carousel and have it rotate at 0.0007 rpm and see if you can feel anything.
You can tell the Earth is rotating by the motion of the stars, and the progression of the Sun. There are geophysical signs, such as the bulge of the oceans at the equator due to centripetal acceleration. When we are in orbit around the Earth, we can measure its rotation relative to our own orbital motion.
Significantly, it makes a big difference if we are launching a satellite to go east instead of west, because eastbound allows us to take advantage of Earth's rotational velocity---while westbound imposes that on us as a velocity penalty.
Space is a vacuum. There is nothing "there" to have a temperature. What utterly faint gas that may be there is often at "temperatures" of thousands of degrees, but it is meaningless since it is so thin. It's like the vacuum in a TV tube.
What happens is that anything in shadow will radiate to open space, which has a back-radiation temperature equivalent of about 4 kelvins. Tired light from far stars. Space is my business, so no one is misleading me. You are in no position to give instruction.
No debunk. You are speaking gibberish about refraction. The refraction results in curved ray paths. It happens to laser beams as well, because laser beams are only light. I should know something about this because I spent part of my career in the design and analysis of laser weapons and their beam propagation. Atmospheric refraction of the beam was a major problem.
We knew most of this long before NASA. As you might know if you would learn some science instead of visiting websites. While I have a bone to pick with NASA about their "climate science" (a political corruption), their statements on matters of space travel and planetary science are reliable. If you want to say they are liars, prove the lies. I mean PROVE them, with verifiable evidence---not "I think I see..." arguments based on looking at Rorschach blots.
Or just give it up as a lost cause. Centuries of science and exploration has proven the Earth to be "spherical" to a high degree. There are no inexplicable features. And Australia is not upside down (of course).
Please explain why a satellite photograph would not show a picture on its side or upside down. I struggle with the concept that we are spinning at 1000mph+, Elipses Orbiting at 67000 mph and hurtling through space at 500, 000 mph. All the planets moons etc keeping near perfect time with us. Of course I also wonder why if the sun is 90+ million miles away, temp is 10,000f (BTW a plasma metal cutter is 40,000f) traveling through Negative 430f tempature, the rays warm/radiate/Planck through uv/molecular heat the earth. I wonder why you can see Chicago across lake MI. 53 or so miles away. Should be on the other side of the curve. I am not saying the world is flat, round. Or Taco shaped. I am saying they lie and they don't know either.
You haven't looked at enough satellite images, for one thing. Struggle all you want. Why are you struggling? The rotation is a tiny rate. Figure it out for yourself, instead of struggling in dumb wonder. We have no capability to sense speed, as anyone can realize by flying in a jet airplane at 600+ mph. Not so far from 1000 mph, right?
For most of your other questions, read a textbook on astronomy. (Space has no temperature, by the way.)
As for Chicago across the lake, that is an effect of atmospheric refraction. It is a general effect, but can be stronger when there is a temperature distribution cold at the surface, warming with height, as might be true of water over a lake.
Read the encylopedia. Obtain some learning! It is not all lies. "They" (whoever they are) are not everywhere, pen in hand, writing everything. We knew all about the Earth and Moon before there was ever a NASA. The only thing that NASA contributed was passage to the Moon and the opportunity to make better measurements.
If you don't know any truth, you are simply lost---by your own choice.
I'm trying to be civil and kind. 1. Is not true due to the fact that a flight on an airplane 1hr east and west (without head/tailwind produces the same distance. 2. Temp: According to the people who mislead you space has a temp of approx -450 degrees f. https://www.space.com/14719-spacekids-temperature-outer-space.html 3. Chicago: that lie has been debunked because refractions hold fast to the visual horizon they sit upon. Think mirage on a desert sand. Also I can show you testing (if you wish) of a laser beam traveling miles across a flat lake, this being impossible as laser shoot straight. You say it's not all lies. I won't put words in your mouth. Nasa gets approx 68 million a day. That money means alot to them and possibly others. I wish you peace, and apologize if I have offended you, and ask you forgiveness. https://youtu.be/qniCs03t3GM
You can tell the Earth is rotating by the motion of the stars, and the progression of the Sun. There are geophysical signs, such as the bulge of the oceans at the equator due to centripetal acceleration. When we are in orbit around the Earth, we can measure its rotation relative to our own orbital motion.
Significantly, it makes a big difference if we are launching a satellite to go east instead of west, because eastbound allows us to take advantage of Earth's rotational velocity---while westbound imposes that on us as a velocity penalty.
What happens is that anything in shadow will radiate to open space, which has a back-radiation temperature equivalent of about 4 kelvins. Tired light from far stars. Space is my business, so no one is misleading me. You are in no position to give instruction.
No debunk. You are speaking gibberish about refraction. The refraction results in curved ray paths. It happens to laser beams as well, because laser beams are only light. I should know something about this because I spent part of my career in the design and analysis of laser weapons and their beam propagation. Atmospheric refraction of the beam was a major problem.
We knew most of this long before NASA. As you might know if you would learn some science instead of visiting websites. While I have a bone to pick with NASA about their "climate science" (a political corruption), their statements on matters of space travel and planetary science are reliable. If you want to say they are liars, prove the lies. I mean PROVE them, with verifiable evidence---not "I think I see..." arguments based on looking at Rorschach blots.