The bottom is the picture run through fotoforensics.com
The black area doesn't have the same level of variation / detail as the rest. That's why it shows black.
The straight lines you can see in the pure white area are due to this being a "mosaic", because Antarctica is "too big" to photograph all at once. However, the mosaic lines only exist in the pure white area. The rest is not too big to photograph all at once.
It is very common to see an amateur analyst force a result into their desired answer. For example, ELA renders a picture that reflects the compression rate. People often post to Twitter comments like "It's real!" or "It's fake!" when the ELA result really indicates a very low quality image or a consistent compression rate. (With ELA, "white" does not mean modified; white means a higher error level potential that must be compared against similar edges and similar surfaces in the picture.)
For example, a photo may show a white edge around a person's hair that stops at the body. This could mean that the head was spliced onto the body. However, it could also identify selective sharpening, editing of the head, editing around the head, or a high contrast between the hair and the background. The picture may also be scaled or resaved by an Adobe application -- both of which could increase the error potential along high-contrast and high-frequency edges. ELA shows where the compression level varies within the picture, but it does not identify what caused the variation.
Genesis 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
Such intense opposition to a fixed flat earth makes me wonder what other's motives are. I mean, who the hell has actually gone up there and looked themselves before declaring one way or the other? Hmmm🤔
The weird thing about this topic is that rarely do people find a significant flaw with the math that is used that is expected to show how far you should be able to see before something is beyond a horizon line.
This isn't the only problem, do you know what it would take to rig two 100 story office towers to collapse with explosives, in the middle of New York City, without anybody noticing?
Garbage like this is just meant to make us look like idiots.
From what I recall...
there are witness accounts and recordings of people calling about strange "security" trucks showing up every night for 2-3 months prior "installing" "renovating" what have you.
Thermite, military grade, installed on the beams to cut them for free fall, no mini-nukes or anything like that. Planes remotely controlled and turned off transponders while remotely controlled grey, full size military drone aircraft, flew intercept on radar and then to their final target. Totally legit black ops "operation northwoods" style, conspiracy fact.
The only problem with this is the video of the collapse as it happened. It can't be more obvious that as each floor was overloaded with debris from above, it pancaked down, blowing dust out on all four sides. Repeating the process all the way down. Cutting the beams with explosives would have caused the building to collapse inward. Watch any controlled demolition to see what I'm talking about.
The video IS the proof! It's simple physics, if the pancake theory were true they couldn't have possibly fell at free fall speed. I believe Newton's second law of motion describes that a force "pancaking" would act on the motion "speed" of the falling floors, to cause at least SOME deceleration, but all the 3 buildings that fell that day were caught, on Video, at Free Fall Acceleration meaning they were ABSOLUTELY demolished.
As to why is wasn't "inward"... because they weren't doing it in vegas! Those guys can do it anyway they want and when it's done to "renovate" an old casino for a new one, the cleanup is easier if it's just one big pile, also being less intrusive or possibly damaging on surrounding buildings.
The moment sustained by the falling floor above is 3 times greater than the weight of the debris. The floor getting hit is designed only to carry it's live load. Add in the accumulation of debris as it goes downward, those bolted connections were shearing off at freefall speed.
An explosive cut steel beam has nowhere to go but inward. To get the effect we saw in the video, they would have had to time the explosives, starting exactly at the crash location, and vaporize the columns out from under the floors above them. Timed to perfection, I might add. Where were the explosive flashes?
I admit I struggled the exact same way, regurgitating all the debunkin's...
If you really care to give it a fair shake... watch the documentary, I probably saw a dozen over the years before I saw this one... This one changed my mind.
Looking back on it...The other docs were clearly propaganda even though they claimed to be "truthers" ... Probably why I kept watching them, they never really satisfied my questions.
Sorry I don't buy the flat earth.
The Awakening Train stops for no one!
Flat earther evidence ---> "Look at it, just look."
Have to agree to keeping flat earth here, it's been a tactic to smear the entire group as "look at those flaterthers and qanons"
That's kind of why Eddie Bravo's most quotable phrase is, "Look into it bro, just look into it."
Don't you miss it? Don't you miss it? Some of you people just about missed it.
Top Comment By shill OP
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrKrFHHu/x/c/4Ob8dfyhtoo
FotoForensics.com has lots of great info and warns against making this exact mistake. https://fotoforensics.com/tutorial.php?tt=mistakes
...
Mistake #2: Forcing an Answer
It is very common to see an amateur analyst force a result into their desired answer. For example, ELA renders a picture that reflects the compression rate. People often post to Twitter comments like "It's real!" or "It's fake!" when the ELA result really indicates a very low quality image or a consistent compression rate. (With ELA, "white" does not mean modified; white means a higher error level potential that must be compared against similar edges and similar surfaces in the picture.)
For example, a photo may show a white edge around a person's hair that stops at the body. This could mean that the head was spliced onto the body. However, it could also identify selective sharpening, editing of the head, editing around the head, or a high contrast between the hair and the background. The picture may also be scaled or resaved by an Adobe application -- both of which could increase the error potential along high-contrast and high-frequency edges. ELA shows where the compression level varies within the picture, but it does not identify what caused the variation.
Thank you.
u/#trumpbeatdown
Always remember what former CIA director William Casey stated --
Genesis 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=001IXnp0ogc How does this work ?
Such intense opposition to a fixed flat earth makes me wonder what other's motives are. I mean, who the hell has actually gone up there and looked themselves before declaring one way or the other? Hmmm🤔
NP, please deport conspiracy.win things folks
What is the proper selection when asked "What rule does this content violate?"
This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!
sorry I don't have that option... https://files.catbox.moe/refmmy.png
other?
Other > enter: conspicaries.win material
The weird thing about this topic is that rarely do people find a significant flaw with the math that is used that is expected to show how far you should be able to see before something is beyond a horizon line.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrKrFHHu/x/c/4Ob8dg4PWe9
Yes please.
Yeah. I got banned for talking about this subject
This isn't the only problem, do you know what it would take to rig two 100 story office towers to collapse with explosives, in the middle of New York City, without anybody noticing?
Garbage like this is just meant to make us look like idiots.
Believing the official narrative is just a tad more retarded, I'm afraid.
And the passports were found on the sidewalk, I know- whatever faggot.
Andy_Man45 is clearly a shill. Please deport. She is not here to discuss, but to make a narrative.
Look at the theme of this blog, airhead. Conspiracies.win is where this garbage should taken.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw - This made me a believer/truther.
Any chance I could get the long story short on my question above. I'm right in the middle of studying the words of God.
From what I recall...
there are witness accounts and recordings of people calling about strange "security" trucks showing up every night for 2-3 months prior "installing" "renovating" what have you.
Thermite, military grade, installed on the beams to cut them for free fall, no mini-nukes or anything like that. Planes remotely controlled and turned off transponders while remotely controlled grey, full size military drone aircraft, flew intercept on radar and then to their final target. Totally legit black ops "operation northwoods" style, conspiracy fact.
The only problem with this is the video of the collapse as it happened. It can't be more obvious that as each floor was overloaded with debris from above, it pancaked down, blowing dust out on all four sides. Repeating the process all the way down. Cutting the beams with explosives would have caused the building to collapse inward. Watch any controlled demolition to see what I'm talking about.
The video IS the proof! It's simple physics, if the pancake theory were true they couldn't have possibly fell at free fall speed. I believe Newton's second law of motion describes that a force "pancaking" would act on the motion "speed" of the falling floors, to cause at least SOME deceleration, but all the 3 buildings that fell that day were caught, on Video, at Free Fall Acceleration meaning they were ABSOLUTELY demolished.
As to why is wasn't "inward"... because they weren't doing it in vegas! Those guys can do it anyway they want and when it's done to "renovate" an old casino for a new one, the cleanup is easier if it's just one big pile, also being less intrusive or possibly damaging on surrounding buildings.
On 9-11, the DS gave zero fucks.
The moment sustained by the falling floor above is 3 times greater than the weight of the debris. The floor getting hit is designed only to carry it's live load. Add in the accumulation of debris as it goes downward, those bolted connections were shearing off at freefall speed.
An explosive cut steel beam has nowhere to go but inward. To get the effect we saw in the video, they would have had to time the explosives, starting exactly at the crash location, and vaporize the columns out from under the floors above them. Timed to perfection, I might add. Where were the explosive flashes?
thermite is not an explosive. Walter White Explains - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am_6X_B0OPE (less than 2 min)
I admit I struggled the exact same way, regurgitating all the debunkin's...
If you really care to give it a fair shake... watch the documentary, I probably saw a dozen over the years before I saw this one... This one changed my mind.
Looking back on it...The other docs were clearly propaganda even though they claimed to be "truthers" ... Probably why I kept watching them, they never really satisfied my questions.
Deport this shill