No problem getting through the Van Allen belt. You just zip through at thousands of miles per hour. There is no loitering, and the belts are relatively close to the Earth. They do not extend to the Moon.
The "radiation" consists of high-energy electrons and protons. No gamma rays, alpha particles, or neutrons. Much of it may be mitigated by shielding.
There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.
We did it before, and I don't think you can pull up any NASA statement that it is death to transit the belts. It's not healthy, of course, and anything we can do to mitigate the exposure is better for the astronauts. Kind of like automobile safety. People work on it all the time, but not because we would die from driving an automobile.
I think you don't know anything about the subject, frankly, and are just cherry-picking your favorite (unnamed) Authority.
“ There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.”
That’s if you believe we actually went to the moon.
Of course there is “belief” necessary. You “believe” those rocks that are in a museum somewhere actually came from the moon and not from somewhere here on earth. It wouldn’t be the first time someone passed of a counterfeit as the real thing. Like I said in my original comment; in my book the jury is still out on the subject.
You don't have any process for the jury to make a conclusion. All the evidence you need is already present. I believe that somebody went to the Moon because I saw it happen in full view before the world. A Saturn V is not "fake and gay" (as some would maintain). One does not create an entire industry for the sake of a motion picture.
There is the principle of a working hypothesis. On the basis of what you know, take a posture. It's okay to listen to anyone who has something worthwhile to say. But you have to know more than those who parade their misunderstanding and ignorance for evidence of mystery and deception.
No problem getting through the Van Allen belt. You just zip through at thousands of miles per hour. There is no loitering, and the belts are relatively close to the Earth. They do not extend to the Moon.
The "radiation" consists of high-energy electrons and protons. No gamma rays, alpha particles, or neutrons. Much of it may be mitigated by shielding.
There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.
Really, then why does nasa have guys working on how to safely transit it without dying. Their words. We can't do it yet.
We did it before, and I don't think you can pull up any NASA statement that it is death to transit the belts. It's not healthy, of course, and anything we can do to mitigate the exposure is better for the astronauts. Kind of like automobile safety. People work on it all the time, but not because we would die from driving an automobile.
I think you don't know anything about the subject, frankly, and are just cherry-picking your favorite (unnamed) Authority.
“ There is no evidence "that a human being wouldn't be able to survive radiation exposure in the Van Allen radiation belt." There is only evidence that they did.”
That’s if you believe we actually went to the moon.
Since they brought back chunks of it, it sort of follows that they were there. No "belief" necessary.
Of course there is “belief” necessary. You “believe” those rocks that are in a museum somewhere actually came from the moon and not from somewhere here on earth. It wouldn’t be the first time someone passed of a counterfeit as the real thing. Like I said in my original comment; in my book the jury is still out on the subject.
You don't have any process for the jury to make a conclusion. All the evidence you need is already present. I believe that somebody went to the Moon because I saw it happen in full view before the world. A Saturn V is not "fake and gay" (as some would maintain). One does not create an entire industry for the sake of a motion picture.
There is the principle of a working hypothesis. On the basis of what you know, take a posture. It's okay to listen to anyone who has something worthwhile to say. But you have to know more than those who parade their misunderstanding and ignorance for evidence of mystery and deception.