Going back to post 619 the expectation is set that trying top level NWO/DS operatives in civilian courts would be pointless. The alternative not stated explicitly would be Military Tribunals.
https://qposts.online/?q=619&s=postnum
Post 2523 and 2583 are more explicit and talks about the charge of being an unlawful enemy combatant. It discusses an exchange between Lindsey Graham and then Judge Kavanaugh on the topic. And tribunals.
https://qposts.online/?q=2523&s=postnum
https://qposts.online/?q=2583&s=postnum
Then we end up with 3716 and 3717 identical posts. Who is charged under sealed indictment and who is first arrested may not be as important as what the charges are and who is taking them into custody. The door has to be opened on Law of War violations for Military Tribunals to be used. Maybe what we should be looking for is the first charge of being an unlawful enemy combatant.
Do bribes fall under law of war violations? We'd then have everybody bribed with hookers and coke being tried in a military tribunal all because they wanted some ass and to get high.
Not bribes but Treason does. If he took a bribe that directly affected Lets Say the United State of America’s Presidential Election in an attempt to overthrow the RIGHTFUL winner and insert a person that is being blackmailed and controlled by the country that’s paid the bribe THAT WOULD fall under military tribunals!!
The Founders specifically defined treason so that a future president down the line couldn't charge someone with treason for speaking ill of them. Hell, Big Ears once put out a tweet, basically saying that speaking ill of the president and wishing for failure isn't patriotism, but is treason. I'm not going to make the argument that nothing that the cabal has done is treason, but we shouldn't throw it around willy nilly - we should treat 'crimes against humanity' the same as well.
I understand and agree it shouldn’t be expected that a mass arrest will happen for treasonous activities but my statement was specifically about the act of rigging an election in an effort to remove the rightfully selected president because you were bribed or blackmailed to do so… that is clear cut treason as so as you’re doing it to take power from the president
Sedition yes, but I'll repeat that treason was very narrowly defined. Who are we in a hot, open war with? Would normies ever believe we've been in a hidden war against satanic cannibal pedophiles? They believe ritual sacrifice ended thousands of years ago. I'm not saying it can't ever be used - No Name was a perfect example of that, having given aid and comfort to a country we were fighting twice.