Cosby did legal drugs with women in the 70s. I'm sorry, but a woman who knowingly takes drugs with a celebrity is planning on having sex with them. These women clearly don't know the difference between regret and rape. Actually look into the case before you pass judgement.
Besides, this stuff didn't come out until Cosby started calling out the problems in the black community. That's why he was silenced.
Accusations go back decades. He was able to survive because of money he made for others besides himself. Women told their stories for decades. Swoooop, under the rug. His original sweetheart deal with the prosecution to avoid justice he admitted his guilt. The dude raped women. It boggles the mind people defending a rapist who admitted to it when he thought he was going to get away again.
He admitted that he had sex with women while they were on drugs. Drugs they'd taken knowingly. That's what was called rape. They called it rape because the women theoretically couldn't consent, because they were on drugs. They called that an admission of guilt.
If a woman takes drugs with a celebrity, she has to know sex is on the table. If he'd been slipping them drugs without their knowledge, I could understand the accusations. That's the way it was portrayed in the media. But it was a flat-out lie. They knowingly took drugs with Cosby, who, on the same drugs himself, then had sex with them.
Not all the druggings was knowingly. He chose the dose. They couldn't stop him if they were aware. Most woke up wondering. IF. THEY. WERE. RAPED. Have you seen women on ludes? They can't talk or defend themselves. The perfect victim for a rapist.
"His original sweetheart deal with the prosecution" involved compelled testimony. They pushed him into that corner, because there was absolutely NO verifiable evidence. "The accusations go back decades" is another way of saying this all happened a very long time ago, and the women waited 30 or 40 years to come forward. How is that credible at all? There was hearsay from the 70s, and a few women willing to testify against a celebrity. They put out all of this nonsense to ruin him in the court of public opinion because they knew it would never hold up in a real courtroom for very long. And it didn't. That's why he's free now.
He's free because of the old original deal he made, where he admitted to drugging women before having sex with an unconscious victim. You know, rape. If there was no evidence, then why admit to rape? And when you rape an unknown # of women for over 40 years? Yeah, rapes would have happened a long time ago. Have you ever seen a woman on ludes? Sex with someone in that condition is rape. You notice he wasn't on ludes, just his victims.
... and go somewhere else to defend rape. I'm done with you.
You're not going back and forth because you didn't do anything but watch media about the trial, and his buddies backstabbing him to save their own careers.
Just ask his date, once she comes to.
Cosby did legal drugs with women in the 70s. I'm sorry, but a woman who knowingly takes drugs with a celebrity is planning on having sex with them. These women clearly don't know the difference between regret and rape. Actually look into the case before you pass judgement.
Besides, this stuff didn't come out until Cosby started calling out the problems in the black community. That's why he was silenced.
Accusations go back decades. He was able to survive because of money he made for others besides himself. Women told their stories for decades. Swoooop, under the rug. His original sweetheart deal with the prosecution to avoid justice he admitted his guilt. The dude raped women. It boggles the mind people defending a rapist who admitted to it when he thought he was going to get away again.
He admitted that he had sex with women while they were on drugs. Drugs they'd taken knowingly. That's what was called rape. They called it rape because the women theoretically couldn't consent, because they were on drugs. They called that an admission of guilt.
If a woman takes drugs with a celebrity, she has to know sex is on the table. If he'd been slipping them drugs without their knowledge, I could understand the accusations. That's the way it was portrayed in the media. But it was a flat-out lie. They knowingly took drugs with Cosby, who, on the same drugs himself, then had sex with them.
Not all the druggings was knowingly. He chose the dose. They couldn't stop him if they were aware. Most woke up wondering. IF. THEY. WERE. RAPED. Have you seen women on ludes? They can't talk or defend themselves. The perfect victim for a rapist.
"His original sweetheart deal with the prosecution" involved compelled testimony. They pushed him into that corner, because there was absolutely NO verifiable evidence. "The accusations go back decades" is another way of saying this all happened a very long time ago, and the women waited 30 or 40 years to come forward. How is that credible at all? There was hearsay from the 70s, and a few women willing to testify against a celebrity. They put out all of this nonsense to ruin him in the court of public opinion because they knew it would never hold up in a real courtroom for very long. And it didn't. That's why he's free now.
He's free because of the old original deal he made, where he admitted to drugging women before having sex with an unconscious victim. You know, rape. If there was no evidence, then why admit to rape? And when you rape an unknown # of women for over 40 years? Yeah, rapes would have happened a long time ago. Have you ever seen a woman on ludes? Sex with someone in that condition is rape. You notice he wasn't on ludes, just his victims.
... and go somewhere else to defend rape. I'm done with you.
You're full of shit dude. And no I'm not going back and forth so save it.
Edit: I agree about the "black community" part as he definitely was marginalized over that, but not that the rape stuff was an extension of this.
You're not going back and forth because you didn't do anything but watch media about the trial, and his buddies backstabbing him to save their own careers.