Wondering why there have been so many slide posts? New Pfizer docs dropped
(phmpt.org)
🔍 START DIGGING
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (80)
sorted by:
This is a better look at each subject who had an adverse effect, several pages for each so not 3500 victims. First one had a medical history that would make it easy to gloss over the fatal heart attack 2 mos. after 2nd dose--especially with no autopsy. I'm wondering already if there was some cherry picking of cases that could be swept under the rug the same way.
also, given placebo
What I'm saying. It looks like a pretty good medical record, but they lost a lot of data already, so who knows how good it really is.
The placebo pts are shocking me. Did these patients CONSENT to be in the placebo group? Did they CONSENT to being part of an EXPERIMENT? I'm thinking this is a pretty big find!
In the best study, neither the experimenters nor the participants would know who was in the control/placebo group and who was in the treatment/experimental group until it was all over. That's called a blind study. At least the participants shouldn't know, to keep them more objective about what they are experiencing. Pfizer and Moderna both apparently decided to destroy all credibility part way through the trial data collection by telling the placebo group they weren't getting the real stuff, and asked them if they wanted the vaccine instead of a placebo. About 90% did! So in the end there was hardly any control group. The only reason for them to do this imo was because there were so many adverse effects they wanted to cover it up, or it was obvious that the vaccinated group was getting sick at least as often as the control group, or that the vaccinees were getting sicker--in retrospect, probably all three. Their pious excuse was that it was so important to protect everyone, they were morally obligated to vaccinate everyone as soon as possible.
The way studies work, you don't know if you're in the placebo group and neither does the person dosing you. It's called a double blind study, and this practice is supposed to eliminate any bias, unconscious or conscience, that could come about from knowing.
Everyone was withdrawn from the study for various reasons. Ironic they didn’t feel any serious side effects were due to the vaccine, only dizziness, pain at injection, etc. Don’t have time now but was starting to notice a pattern. Need to compare time frame, lot number, reaction
Everyone was withdrawn, or everyone withdrew? There is a difference. The first case indicates that maybe someone was trying to stop this thing running down the hill into the fiery pits of doom. The second was a bottom-up FU reaction from the 'clients'.
I would say both? Pregnancy, withdrawn. Death, withdrawn. Attempted suicide, withdrawn. There’s everything from muscle spasms to vomiting to facial paralysis to tumors found 21 (don’t quote me) after vax. To me, they attributed anything serious to pre-existing condition and only said minimal things like dizziness or injection site swelling could be attributed. I haven’t gone through the entire document but it looks like all these patients were withdrawn from the study? Also wonder about the “placebo” bc some of the adverse reactions are things we’ve read about on VAERS with people who had no preexisting condition.
Who knows? Are there any descriptions for the saline solution? There may be added surfactants, or some other kind of salt that is not sodium chloride, to 'make the solution more efficient', or perhaps a preservative, because, you know salt is not a preservative, enough. (sarcastic). Maybe something was added to the water to keep it from putrefying in the vats, while it was waiting for the alleged salt to be added.
Maybe someone didn't clean the vats properly before plant made a new batch of saline shots.