I’m stating what I did because due to flow of highway traffic and spent 15 years working with law enforcement. To plan a direct and perfect target head on collision on a flowing highway unless it’s a movie set is like 1-10,000 chance to get it correct. And this accident surly does not looked planned nor as fishy as the Uvalde School Shooting. I’m pretty sure by all current reports this was an actual car accident. And I’m admitting now I could be wrong down the road. But all current reports show this was a regular flowing road and traffic, not a movie set.
The “reports” were written to manipulate us into making exactly that conclusion. There’s no reason to trust them any more than the MSM. The fact that it said “accident” makes me all the more sure it wasn’t.
Dude accidentally happen every day. Car wrecks are around 60k deaths per year and top 10 cause. I'm not saying it isnt cabal but truly every death being cabal is insane. Real accidents happen daily to average and wealthy people everywhere. We are jaded but it doesn't mean accidents don't exist and if it was cabal likely the other party would live or there would be no other party (aka kinetic weapon)...also of all the people to attack she would not be anywhere near the top. If we assume they can kill people in accidents this easily we have to assume DJT and others would be did...AKA it's not all a conspiracy.
I don’t trust MSM that’s why it’s a RSB article report. Also it’s not difficult to listen to police scanners if you have the ability, and have the right law enforcement friends.
it would do well of all of us to remember that this place is full of anons on a regular basis, and that that sets a certain bar on conclusions and the general debate.
while i respect what you do, and the time you put in, your tone and your level of respect for people here just fukking suck today. i will assume that is not ordinarily the case and hope for the best.
Really? My tone hahaha. Really when I’m the one being hammered for just asking Anons not to assume? And just because I’m rebutting the flame-age, you’re now calling into question as just only “my tone”….. hmm. Well. I guess I’m not allowed to rebut or defend my post then Anon. Odd. I thought we could do that. I must have read a rule wrong somewhere. My mistake. I’m going to go drink my can of special “STFU Don’t You Dare Rebut” and go check the rules again. Thank you for showing me error of my ways.
I’m stating what I did because due to flow of highway traffic and spent 15 years working with law enforcement. To plan a direct and perfect target head on collision on a flowing highway unless it’s a movie set is like 1-10,000 chance to get it correct. And this accident surly does not looked planned nor as fishy as the Uvalde School Shooting. I’m pretty sure by all current reports this was an actual car accident. And I’m admitting now I could be wrong down the road. But all current reports show this was a regular flowing road and traffic, not a movie set.
The “reports” were written to manipulate us into making exactly that conclusion. There’s no reason to trust them any more than the MSM. The fact that it said “accident” makes me all the more sure it wasn’t.
This is different than striking a kid with a missile
Dude accidentally happen every day. Car wrecks are around 60k deaths per year and top 10 cause. I'm not saying it isnt cabal but truly every death being cabal is insane. Real accidents happen daily to average and wealthy people everywhere. We are jaded but it doesn't mean accidents don't exist and if it was cabal likely the other party would live or there would be no other party (aka kinetic weapon)...also of all the people to attack she would not be anywhere near the top. If we assume they can kill people in accidents this easily we have to assume DJT and others would be did...AKA it's not all a conspiracy.
I don’t trust MSM that’s why it’s a RSB article report. Also it’s not difficult to listen to police scanners if you have the ability, and have the right law enforcement friends.
We live in a time when drone strikes can take out Al-Qaeda leaders, and geo-location tracking is down to the exact coordinates of the person.
Q specifically mentions things like this in terms of that train « collision with a construction truck . »
This was a targeted kill. Trump put out 5:5 yesterday.
We are at war. There are no coincidences or accidents at this level.
and?
you are still making a judgement call that is possibly unwarranted.
excuse the lot of us if we just don't take your word for it and are waiting for some real SAUCE.
By all means go research then your highness. I shall bow as I leave the room for fucks sake.
let's simplify.
it would do well of all of us to remember that this place is full of anons on a regular basis, and that that sets a certain bar on conclusions and the general debate.
while i respect what you do, and the time you put in, your tone and your level of respect for people here just fukking suck today. i will assume that is not ordinarily the case and hope for the best.
Really? My tone hahaha. Really when I’m the one being hammered for just asking Anons not to assume? And just because I’m rebutting the flame-age, you’re now calling into question as just only “my tone”….. hmm. Well. I guess I’m not allowed to rebut or defend my post then Anon. Odd. I thought we could do that. I must have read a rule wrong somewhere. My mistake. I’m going to go drink my can of special “STFU Don’t You Dare Rebut” and go check the rules again. Thank you for showing me error of my ways.
“Hey bartender!”
RSB is pretty true with their reporting along with listening to Arizona police scanners. I wish I could type fast enough and post those here.
Front tail and a suicidial tweaker with a radio... definitely doable.
Haha that’s terrible.
cause you think you are authority? Princess Dianna laughs at your ignorant assumption that you try to sway my thinking. wrong forum bubs