But with the added structure of super secret material that is so dangerous only special people get to deal with it directly in the most compartmentalised structure...same with nuclear power etc. Are there extremely devastating weapons the military has? Absolutely. But to me, I just look at any article related to the Webb telescope images over the past month, and it's clear that fake and gay science for comms goes deeper than I could have ever imagined.
Oh, I agree most Webb news, and asteroid news, or even most popular science news are fake for sure. i still haven’t created a consistent theory as to the mechanics of how these news are originated. i think there is at least one or two layers of scientists who believe this stuff.
As for non existence of nuclear weapons - I dont rule it out, but it requires far more digging and addressing a lot of questions thoroughly, which I havent seen anyone do. Would love too look at it if someone has rendered this subject.
I have to wonder how old you are. There are people who have seen them in action. Two whole cities have been blasted flat because of them, and they had to be rebuilt. (My father saw the ruins of Nagasaki in 1945.) Plenty of photographic records of the megaton-level airbursts, spacebursts, and surface bursts. (Also ground residue, such as trinitite from the Trinity detonation, of which I have a sample.) We even have special satellite sensors to detect the specific signature of a nuclear burst in the atmosphere.
You might as well rule out the existence of airplanes. Or volcano eruptions.
Meanwhile, reality does not pause, and there are plenty of nuclear weapons around, especially under control of Russia and China.
As for non existence of nuclear weapons - I dont rule it out, but it requires far more digging and addressing a lot of questions thoroughly, which I havent seen anyone do. Would love too look at it if someone has rendered this subject.
When I said this earlier, this is what I meant. Any theory put forward about non existence of nuclear weapons need to address all the items you listed, in addition to tons of other stuff.
But with the added structure of super secret material that is so dangerous only special people get to deal with it directly in the most compartmentalised structure...same with nuclear power etc. Are there extremely devastating weapons the military has? Absolutely. But to me, I just look at any article related to the Webb telescope images over the past month, and it's clear that fake and gay science for comms goes deeper than I could have ever imagined.
Oh, I agree most Webb news, and asteroid news, or even most popular science news are fake for sure. i still haven’t created a consistent theory as to the mechanics of how these news are originated. i think there is at least one or two layers of scientists who believe this stuff.
As for non existence of nuclear weapons - I dont rule it out, but it requires far more digging and addressing a lot of questions thoroughly, which I havent seen anyone do. Would love too look at it if someone has rendered this subject.
I have to wonder how old you are. There are people who have seen them in action. Two whole cities have been blasted flat because of them, and they had to be rebuilt. (My father saw the ruins of Nagasaki in 1945.) Plenty of photographic records of the megaton-level airbursts, spacebursts, and surface bursts. (Also ground residue, such as trinitite from the Trinity detonation, of which I have a sample.) We even have special satellite sensors to detect the specific signature of a nuclear burst in the atmosphere.
You might as well rule out the existence of airplanes. Or volcano eruptions.
Meanwhile, reality does not pause, and there are plenty of nuclear weapons around, especially under control of Russia and China.
When I said this earlier, this is what I meant. Any theory put forward about non existence of nuclear weapons need to address all the items you listed, in addition to tons of other stuff.
Roger.