I have a serious question that I would appreciate some feedback on.
In situations like this, what are the use of comms if people can't figure out the comms?
Are comms meant for everyone, if so, why are they so difficult to figure out, with different people getting vastly different interpretations of the same comm?
If they're only meant for a select few, who know how to interpret them, then what is the use of the general public trying to figure them out?
Q answered that, in a way, by stating that some of these are only intended to be understood at a later date. It's clear that some comms are meant for specific people. Others are intended as markers to be referenced. And some are meant for us to figure out, as Q told us to learn.
But obviously comms that can't be understood by anyone aren't comms at all.
I have a serious question that I would appreciate some feedback on.
In situations like this, what are the use of comms if people can't figure out the comms?
Are comms meant for everyone, if so, why are they so difficult to figure out, with different people getting vastly different interpretations of the same comm?
If they're only meant for a select few, who know how to interpret them, then what is the use of the general public trying to figure them out?
I think the answer is they aren’t always, or necessarily meant for us. But some of us, not me, are exceptionally good at figuring them out.
The value of Anons figuring them out, in my opinion, is to make us prepared to counsel normies when news breaks that wakes them up.
Q answered that, in a way, by stating that some of these are only intended to be understood at a later date. It's clear that some comms are meant for specific people. Others are intended as markers to be referenced. And some are meant for us to figure out, as Q told us to learn.
But obviously comms that can't be understood by anyone aren't comms at all.