Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

350
Here's another take on that warrant. This fellow posits that the Never Trumpers may be in some big trouble. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 3 years ago by b472113 3 years ago by b472113 +350 / -0
28 comments download share
28 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– TRUMPMD 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

Interesting !!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– user2827 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Now that would be an understatement. For that to be true, that would mean that there was a successful infiltration and things really are not as they seem.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– GA-Peach-Patriot 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

I Might need to have an “in other words” explanation on this one…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– Edge 29 points 3 years ago +29 / -0

"How do you introduce evidence, legally?" should suffice.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– FullAmpleSally 24 points 3 years ago +24 / -0

The raid wasn’t a raid on Trump, but a raid on evidence he had on others.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Anonuser123abc 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

It's a way to bring all this stuff out in the open.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HelloDolly 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

And distance Trump from the doings

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– GGRockz 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Do you think Trump is so dumb that he did something illegally?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DesertBrat 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

According to this article (there are many others as well) he did.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/12/donald-trump-all-documents-seized-fbi-declassified-all-they-had-do-was-ask/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Moose_Antlers 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Interesting. A couple of really big assumptions though:

  1. Assuming that Wray is to be trusted, and is still on the team, despite tremendous evidence of corruption indicating the contrary, including his own sworn statements to Congress.

  2. Assuming Trump is a DoJ asset. The DoJ has been hostile to him since he announced for the Presidency in 2015. The DoJ has gone to war with him, even bugging the White House under fraudulent pretexts from the Hillary "big lie." That's not just a little hostile. It's the most openly hostile the DoJ has been to any elected official in our history.

  3. Assuming the target is Never Trumper Republicans. Even if we were to assume the first two, the natural target would be the DoJ itself. That is, the idea would be that Trump knew their plan and decided to sting the stinger with poison pill data.


If we were to evaluate this, we'd need at least some sort of rationale or logic to suggest any of it is valid.

Yes, Trump used the 33 code, invoking the Deep State in his first response referencing Obama's "33 million documents." And Q341 refers to the specific assertion that Obama classified evidence of crimes and keeps it at his Presidential Library. I'm actually not sure if the building's complete. It only started construction Sept 2021, long after Q341 was written, and I've seen nothing to suggest the building is complete, or that the public has access to any of these documents. This is a very long delay for a presidential library.

Yes, Bezos panicked and had his Washington Compost post a story suggesting Trump had "nuclear secrets." For those unaware, the word "nuclear" is often used as a reference to highly explosive secrets with great destructive potential to the current political order. While the assertion was widely mocked in the media, that too, was part of spreading the message to the ears who needed to hear it. Something important was seized and it was a threat to the Deep State boys.

So, we know something's up here. But we have nothing to point at NeverTrumpers other than that they've been shockingly quiet about the whole thing, but that's because they're biding their time and hoping something legit comes out of this and they can jump on it to finish Trump off. Again, nothing I know of specifically implicates them.


As always, I'm open to new information, but with what I have, the assumptions are too bold and there's insufficient evidence.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Gaterop 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I agree with your conclusion of this makes too many assumptions and lacks evidence, but I think the most glaring issue other than all the assumptions is what on earth is the motive to do something like this? If the theory is that Trump possessed evidence upon leaving, and they needed to raid his home in order to legally use said evidence to take action against someone who isn't Trump, and mind you this action is favorable to Trump... why do they need to do this? If the evidence was obtained illegally, does doing this somehow magically turn it into legally obtained evidence? Not as far as I know, otherwise why would the government need something like the Patriot act? They could just hand over illegally obtained evidence to anyone, raid them, boom its legal, so obviously this isn't the case. And if it was obtained legally, why bother with this? You already have legally obtained evidence of crimes committed by someone, why on earth do you need to give that evidence to someone else and then raid that person's home just to get the evidence again? Not even taking into account the assumptions made it already doesn't make sense as theory.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ThinQ 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It appears they're going after POTUS, right? It appears the DOJ and FBI are all gunning to get the bad orange man and lock him up. The fake news media has been putting this message out for months, that Trump needs to be locked up. Pedowood personalities are chiming in with the message in unison. Now the sheep who are brainwashed by leftist programming are very excited by this latest development. They have not a clue that the marxist DS wants to eliminate bad orange man from being eligible to run for election in 2024 and even needs desperately to stain republicans before the midterms. The marxist trash are about to lose control so they're spinning this as a gotcha moment. Remember when they were all caterwauling about Rittenhouse being a white supremacist? The sheeple were watching the trial with smug enthusiasm. I have a rabid lefty friend who was, refused to believe it when I'd told him beforehand what was going on. After the trial? Crickets. . .

Now that the white hats have the sheeple's attention the sheep will be keeping abreast of what happens as a result of the raid. It's not just RINOs featured in those documents. If the white hats had released that info way back when, when POTUS was visibly and publicly in the driver's seat, the fake news would have just cried witch-hunt, saying they were made-up false stories about the left DS players, the usual. Even right after POTUS moved to the background they'd still cry partisan attack, etc. Now, with over a year and a half of Potatus appearing as (p)resident and this looking like a strong arm tactic to squash the bad orange man, all eyes are on those documents. We know that POTUS is calling for the documents to be released to the public, claims they were declassified so this will end up in court (imho). The sheeple think he's trying to hide something.

Sheep will be watching. Patriots will be watching. Fence-sitters will be watching. There are documents that have been declassified and they are now evidence. How do you introduce evidence legally? Let all the people know there are incriminating documents and each thinks it's against the opposing side. They have to be shown. They have to look for themselves. Manufactured desirability.

Optics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ThinQ 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Nice analysis. I also wondered why this meangeneon person was pointing specifically at the Never Trumpers/RINOs/America Last subgroup (I lump them all together, whatever you want to call them). All I can think of is that, for the period in question between the election and the Potatus's fake inauguration, perhaps POTUS was meeting with many NT lawmakers to try and persuade them to do the right thing.

That said, I thought the warrant covered POTUS's entire first term so perhaps this singling-out of just the NTers is to keep the normies engaged and interested in staying on top of this unfolding drama. If he/she had included crimes by the communists, bad tech would have censored his/her tweet/post/whatever source these comments came from. We know fake news won't touch the topics of leftist corruption and crimes, but the tech algorithms wouldn't screen out a message like this because it appears to target only the right. The sheeple will continue to watch this story unfold because they've been trained to reject any incriminating information about the left as "partisan", but rabidly take in anything pointing at criminals on the right. Just a theory.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GA-Peach-Patriot 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

This is an excellent response. A question: what was the 33 code referencing when Trump mentioned 33 mil docs?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

33 degree masons?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– lsdQ 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Just a reminder, Q specifically told us to trust Wray 3 separate times.

https://qalerts.app/?q=Trust+wray

Yes, Q also said that disinformation is necessary, but I feel like in cases where something is said multiple times, this doesn’t apply (but who knows).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– enough_of_the_racism 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

That is assuming the DOJ cares about taking down never Trumpers. I think all they care about is getting Trump. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Hope70 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I bet Trump has back up copies in a secure (military) location.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

To believe this is to believe that Garland is also a sleeper. I find that an extra overly large horse pill to swallow...

Now, this may or may not be true. We don't know. We don't have the part of the warrant that would detail the suspected crime(s), the basis a belief probable cause exists that said crime(s) were committed, and the basis a belief evidence of said crime(s) is likely to be found at Trump's house.

This was a search warrant. It was not an arrest warrant. The search warrant is not going to say who the target is. The application and affidavit(s) in support of said warrant sure will. That is the part that we might see when the 2040 administration takes office and decides to release it. They don't want that coming out. It is either more egg in the face of the bureau, or it could be what this tweet is saying. We'll never know. All we know is "Trump isn't listed as a target on the warrant" is no basis for concluding this is happening. Nobody else is listed as a target either.

edit: And if Wray is a "sleeper" then this raid just gave Garland reason to fire Wray for cause. Complete with political cover.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Trumpternal 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Wtf is meangeneon, do they have any sorta of track record? Why take anything some random twatter user says, just because we like hearing stuff like this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bedminster 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That's a very spicy take!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VetforTrump 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I don't think it was just never trumpers on the republican side.

I think all the shit the fbi sat on is now publicly documented in their possession.

The drop will tell us what they have. If they sit on it again the entire country will call for their destruction.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WakeUpWorld 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I believe all they need to do is keep pushing the narrative he took Top Secret, Classified, or Nuclear Secrets. The sheep will just start repeating " he took muh Nuclear Codes" and soon forget he has the right to Declassified everything and all Presidents do it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– smokenhaze 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

codes that have changed a thousand times since then

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VetforTrump 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

All they're gonna learn by that is trump is still commander in chief

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy