What do these things have in common?
Bitcoin, Russia, Tether, Evergrande, MIT Digital Currency Initiative, Jeffrey Epstein, Pedophilia, Centralized Financial Control, Silver & Gold
Read on.
I was happy and encouraged today to read in a recent sermon by an awake American pastor:
In China the Communist Party sent tanks in front of banks to stop protests by people who were prevented from withdrawing their savings. It is not wise to trust “digital” money and investments, which can be frozen. Real assets are our own skills and relationships, as well as land, precious metals, and, yes, weapons to defend our freedoms.
I specifically appreciated the reference to not trusting 'digital' money.
In the past few weeks, I have been listening to the "Crypto Conspiracy Podcast", which is a 24 part series looking at bitcoin, the emergence of cryptocurrencies, their relationship to the precious metals market, and the circumstances around the rise of bitcoin.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast Episode 1
The pitfalls of digital currencies
The events in Canada at the beginning of the year show us clearly what the Cabal intends to do: being able to shut off and steal the assets of those who stand up against their tyranny, as the Canadian Truckers did. A meme I saw yesterday made an exceedingly pithy point: Having you social media account banned or shut down for X days because you failed to follow "the Community Standards" is simply a precursor of how their social credit system will work, except that it's not just your social media account, but your assets, bank accounts, access to utilities, ability to travel, etc.
All of this - the ability to shut down patriots and those who resist their tyranny at the flick of a switch - relies on their digitized slave system of complete digital surveillance, digital ID and digital assets and currency. Even now, central banks around the world are moving to introduce their own digital currencies, which they - the government - will control completely.
The inherent weakness of cryptocurrencies
Crypto currencies, and specifically the flagship Bitcoin, have the image of being anonymous and decentralized. But this is a misnomer and a false image. Bitcoin is completely centralized in the blockchain; every single action and transaction is recorded and is in fact traceable. This reality has been proven by the various arrests and legal actions taken against certain bitcoin holders.
Even now, there are moves by the government authorities and central banks to take bitcoin down, and replace it with their own digital currency. Russia, for example, has moved to impose regulations on use of crypto, and how it can be used. All that really remains at this point is for governments in the world to pass legislation that regulates, or bans, the use of crypto in exchange for local currency, for example. This sort of move is not hard for them to do.
Evergrande & Tether
Explored in the podcast: Is Tether, touted as an asset-backed stable coin, really based on Evergrande paper debt?
The Epstein connections
What is really mind-blowing about the bitcoin situation is the undeniable number of links between bitcoin, its emergence, and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, M.I.T., bitcoin developers like Joichi Ito and Wladimir Van Der Laan, and those who hold and control major elements of the bitcoin world - all connected.
Even just an hour or two of digging turns up the following. Why is this element NOT being talked about more?
MIT Digital Currency Initiative
MIT Media Lab became notorious after Ito continued to accept funding from Epstein. For years even after his crimes were known, Ito even covered up the actual source of financing.
Sauce: Adam Back Linked to Jeffrey Epstein? Vitalik Buterin Refutes Claims
"The case of Jeffrey Epstein is full of twists and turns, but to summarize it in one word – vile. As a serial sexual assaulter with cases registered against him since 2008, the MIT Digital Currency Initiative still accepted funding from him, which in itself questions the character of those on the board of directors."
Sauce: https://crypto.news/jeffery-epsteins-mit-digital-currency-initiative-industry-concerns/
New documents show that the M.I.T. Media Lab was aware of Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, and that Epstein directed contributions to the lab far exceeding the amounts M.I.T. has publicly admitted.
Sauce: New Yorker Magazine article
Joichi (Joi) Ito
In Japan, he was a founder of Digital Garage, and helped establish and later became CEO of the country’s first commercial Internet service provider. He was an early investor in more than 40 companies, including Flickr, Six Apart, Last.fm, Kongregate, Kickstarter, and Twitter. Ito’s honors include TIME magazine’s “Cyber-Elite” listing in 1997 (at age 31) and selection as one of the “Global Leaders for Tomorrow” by the World Economic Forum (2001).
Sauce: https://www.futureyoungleaders.org/featured-young-leaders/joichi-ito/
Ito & Digital Garage: https://jp.linkedin.com/in/joiito
Epstein, Pedophilia, MIT Media Lab, Joichi Ito: https://themillenniumreport.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-mit-media-lab-and-the-bizarre-suiciding-of-aaron-swartz/
The series of podcasts is extensive, presented by 'Silver guru' David Morgan, but they reveal a much neglected investigation into how bitcoin started, who are the key players in the bitcoin world, and what the advent of bitcoin represents. Is it a coincidence that crypto came out and bitcoin emerged just as Obama rose to the presidency of the USA?
Comment: For many years now, I've had a hard time getting my head around crypto and bitcoin. There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc.
The bigger picture
These podcasts paint a that indicates that, regardless of the value of the technology itself, crypto technology, and specifically bitcoin, etc., have been hijacked by the Cabal powerbrokers to their own advantage, firstly to drive populations away from the traditional storage of monetary value that precious metals (gold, silver, etc) have been, and secondly, to prepare the way for the introduction of centralized digital currencies that "can be frozen" at the drop of a hat.
I recommend this podcast series for all pedes, whether you have interest in gold and silver, or cryptos, or not. The picture these podcasts paint of the larger battlefield helps to put a LOT of what is happening around the world today in a perspective that is clearer than ever, and they point the way forward for those seeking to step outside of their tyranny. In particular, Podcast 14 brings a lot of the key content together. If you want to skip to the meaty part directly, have a listen to podcast 14.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast – Episode 14 - The Other Side of Crypto That Nobody Is Talking About
Either way, there is LOTS to dig on here.
__
Oh come on, they don't control 100% of the technology out there. It IS deeply compromised, but its not like there are no alternatives out there. Linux was made for this very purpose.
Even in crypto, which began as open source technology, there is a whole class of blockchains which respect and enforce users privacy. Bitcoin was hijacked by the cabal years ago but it began as simply a way to prevent centralized control of the issuance of currency. The one caveat is that a hostile entity could amass over 51% of the computing power and commandeer the whole network. That was a known risk from the very beginning. The cabal took over through a company called Blockstream that hired all the Bitcoin Core developers and forced out Gavin Andreson, the person who Satoshi left in charge. They then made several alterations to the core code and ruled the online communities through strict censorship of all discussion of what really happened, and through backhanded deals forbid any alternative implementations of the bitcoin client software.
But due to being open source, it could not be shut down. Many forks of bitcoin now exist, as well as many other original blockchain designs which are competing to replace legacy tech which IS 100% cabal controlled. Look into privacy coins, which are the opposite of CBDCs - funds are untraceable and completely invisible to all except whoever holds the private key.
On the Linux note, even that warrants caution. Canonical and Red Hat Enterprises have both had some questionable aims, and over 80% of home user Linux installations are a variety influenced by one of those two entities.
Even if something that is untainted and entirely open-source, I'll be honest: I wouldn't be able to verify it's clean if you set the source code in front of me, and neither could most people. I'd be reliant on some internet denizen to sound an alarm early enough on if something were amiss.
Yes, but you don't have to use those. Just with anything, you need to do your due diligence and use the "right" ones. Just like I look at the back small print of all my grocery store items and make sure they're not manufactured by brands I want to boycott.
You can use BSD even if you really want.
What's the right one, who wrote it, and how does someone like me with little coding knowledge confirm for himself the software can be trusted?
If you're honest, these problems are insurmountable. Also, if you're honest, gold and silver don't have these problems.
The right one is the one that is best for your needs and values. That's why i have right in quotations. It's completely up to you. If your response is simply, "but I can't know each individual that programmed it so how can I trust them," then you're making an argument that I would respond with, then you shouldn't use a computer at all. If you can't look into a company or group of programmers as best you can and make a decision you're comfortable with, then I don't know what to tell you. You don't have to be an expert to do the beat reseaexh you can with your capabilites. Just know BSD and most Linux distributions are made by people who want to get away from the government.
GLOWIE ALERT!!!!!
On one of the podcasts, it is pointed out that there is a backdoor built into every piece of operating software and all hardware that is built. It's there. Nothing is outside of that reach.
This is partly what Wexit is referring to, I think.
I have heard this and I can't say whether its true or not, but you have to draw a line somewhere as living like there's a backdoor into absolutely everything means you must accept that you already have no privacy.
Yes, the communists have infiltrated our tech at the deepest levels, but what exactly does that mean for them? What does it mean for cyber defense? Is it all a lost cause and we should accept defeat or give up all electronics? Or can we get educated about cyber security instead of saying "its too complicated and I don't understand computers"?
Thanks for the reply.
Like you, I cannot say whether its true or not that there is a backdoor in all the computer-related tech.
But I think there is potential for a discussion here. For one, I see communists as pretty much a lower level operation and not the controllers. Example, Mao was apparently funded and supported by the Rothschilds. Seen evidence to that effect.
"Communism" is for control of the masses. Non of the elites in the Politburo were really communists - they wanted power and everything for themselves. And communism is being used by the Globalists as their attack dog for destroying the barriers to their control in the West and elsewhere. So, I myself wouldn't say "the communists have infiltrated our tech...", because I don't think the one's infiltrating here are communists.
But if the backdoor thing is true, then its something to be worked through and dealt with. Saying its a lost cause and we should accept defeat or give up all electronics is one extreme (and I don't see anyone actually suggesting that), but "it doesn't matter and we should ignore it and just keep going with what we are doing" is another extreme.
I don't think these are the only two options, and if one thinks in these terms, it should be clear that that is a reactionary response. The uber polarization of thought there is a hint.
It might be a difficult rabbit hole for some people, but learning about whether and how our resources are compromised might be a critical element when looking at combating the attack and the agenda behind it.
One of the things this podcast series has done for me is add a whole new and different layer on the overall battlefield, one that I feel is like one of the last pieces of the puzzle I've been working on for 7+ years.
It seems to me it brings in a 30,000 ft view that has been missing, certainly for me, and I think for a lot of pedes.
It means that we can use computers for fun and games and shitposting, but not as a foundational element of our future monetary system.
GLOWIE ALERT!!!!
Look at this fags post history!!!
32 posts in an hour?
Then by that logic even Space Force is pointlessly compromised and we might as well just lay down and die already.
How many of their chips and how much of their steel comes from China? Did Q not speak on this topic?
If Linux were harmful to their interests in any way, you wouldn't be able to access Linux, or they would be trying to ban Linux.
However, you are practically encouraged to use it. What does that tell you?
Even if your linux is trustworthy, which I doubt very much, that leaves the crypto software, the hardware, and the encryption algorithms, plus the complex manner in which they all interact.
Keep in mind, as well, that your adversaries are the same people who infected airgapped computers in an Iranian uranium enrichment facility with a virus that propagated VIA SOUND. If they wanted to attack linux or crypto, they would. They haven't, and so what does that tell you?
They don't even go after any of these things with the vigour with which they go after guns. Why not? A threat to their currency domination is FAR more dangerous to them than guns.
I'm aware of the rough history of it, but my complaint is more fundamental. Open source doesn't protect us, because so very few of us are capable of effectively auditing this software. And trusting existing audits is just "trust the experts" in a different context. We can't trust any software, we can't trust any hardware, we can't trust the internet, none of this says "let's start a brand new form of money built on this foundation!"
I don't have any faith in any publicly available public/private key system, or other encryption system. Why would governments create and give such encryption to their adversaries, for free?
In God we Trust. Computers are electric intelligence agents.