What do these things have in common?
Bitcoin, Russia, Tether, Evergrande, MIT Digital Currency Initiative, Jeffrey Epstein, Pedophilia, Centralized Financial Control, Silver & Gold
Read on.
I was happy and encouraged today to read in a recent sermon by an awake American pastor:
In China the Communist Party sent tanks in front of banks to stop protests by people who were prevented from withdrawing their savings. It is not wise to trust “digital” money and investments, which can be frozen. Real assets are our own skills and relationships, as well as land, precious metals, and, yes, weapons to defend our freedoms.
I specifically appreciated the reference to not trusting 'digital' money.
In the past few weeks, I have been listening to the "Crypto Conspiracy Podcast", which is a 24 part series looking at bitcoin, the emergence of cryptocurrencies, their relationship to the precious metals market, and the circumstances around the rise of bitcoin.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast Episode 1
The pitfalls of digital currencies
The events in Canada at the beginning of the year show us clearly what the Cabal intends to do: being able to shut off and steal the assets of those who stand up against their tyranny, as the Canadian Truckers did. A meme I saw yesterday made an exceedingly pithy point: Having you social media account banned or shut down for X days because you failed to follow "the Community Standards" is simply a precursor of how their social credit system will work, except that it's not just your social media account, but your assets, bank accounts, access to utilities, ability to travel, etc.
All of this - the ability to shut down patriots and those who resist their tyranny at the flick of a switch - relies on their digitized slave system of complete digital surveillance, digital ID and digital assets and currency. Even now, central banks around the world are moving to introduce their own digital currencies, which they - the government - will control completely.
The inherent weakness of cryptocurrencies
Crypto currencies, and specifically the flagship Bitcoin, have the image of being anonymous and decentralized. But this is a misnomer and a false image. Bitcoin is completely centralized in the blockchain; every single action and transaction is recorded and is in fact traceable. This reality has been proven by the various arrests and legal actions taken against certain bitcoin holders.
Even now, there are moves by the government authorities and central banks to take bitcoin down, and replace it with their own digital currency. Russia, for example, has moved to impose regulations on use of crypto, and how it can be used. All that really remains at this point is for governments in the world to pass legislation that regulates, or bans, the use of crypto in exchange for local currency, for example. This sort of move is not hard for them to do.
Evergrande & Tether
Explored in the podcast: Is Tether, touted as an asset-backed stable coin, really based on Evergrande paper debt?
The Epstein connections
What is really mind-blowing about the bitcoin situation is the undeniable number of links between bitcoin, its emergence, and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, M.I.T., bitcoin developers like Joichi Ito and Wladimir Van Der Laan, and those who hold and control major elements of the bitcoin world - all connected.
Even just an hour or two of digging turns up the following. Why is this element NOT being talked about more?
MIT Digital Currency Initiative
MIT Media Lab became notorious after Ito continued to accept funding from Epstein. For years even after his crimes were known, Ito even covered up the actual source of financing.
Sauce: Adam Back Linked to Jeffrey Epstein? Vitalik Buterin Refutes Claims
"The case of Jeffrey Epstein is full of twists and turns, but to summarize it in one word – vile. As a serial sexual assaulter with cases registered against him since 2008, the MIT Digital Currency Initiative still accepted funding from him, which in itself questions the character of those on the board of directors."
Sauce: https://crypto.news/jeffery-epsteins-mit-digital-currency-initiative-industry-concerns/
New documents show that the M.I.T. Media Lab was aware of Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, and that Epstein directed contributions to the lab far exceeding the amounts M.I.T. has publicly admitted.
Sauce: New Yorker Magazine article
Joichi (Joi) Ito
In Japan, he was a founder of Digital Garage, and helped establish and later became CEO of the country’s first commercial Internet service provider. He was an early investor in more than 40 companies, including Flickr, Six Apart, Last.fm, Kongregate, Kickstarter, and Twitter. Ito’s honors include TIME magazine’s “Cyber-Elite” listing in 1997 (at age 31) and selection as one of the “Global Leaders for Tomorrow” by the World Economic Forum (2001).
Sauce: https://www.futureyoungleaders.org/featured-young-leaders/joichi-ito/
Ito & Digital Garage: https://jp.linkedin.com/in/joiito
Epstein, Pedophilia, MIT Media Lab, Joichi Ito: https://themillenniumreport.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-mit-media-lab-and-the-bizarre-suiciding-of-aaron-swartz/
The series of podcasts is extensive, presented by 'Silver guru' David Morgan, but they reveal a much neglected investigation into how bitcoin started, who are the key players in the bitcoin world, and what the advent of bitcoin represents. Is it a coincidence that crypto came out and bitcoin emerged just as Obama rose to the presidency of the USA?
Comment: For many years now, I've had a hard time getting my head around crypto and bitcoin. There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc.
The bigger picture
These podcasts paint a that indicates that, regardless of the value of the technology itself, crypto technology, and specifically bitcoin, etc., have been hijacked by the Cabal powerbrokers to their own advantage, firstly to drive populations away from the traditional storage of monetary value that precious metals (gold, silver, etc) have been, and secondly, to prepare the way for the introduction of centralized digital currencies that "can be frozen" at the drop of a hat.
I recommend this podcast series for all pedes, whether you have interest in gold and silver, or cryptos, or not. The picture these podcasts paint of the larger battlefield helps to put a LOT of what is happening around the world today in a perspective that is clearer than ever, and they point the way forward for those seeking to step outside of their tyranny. In particular, Podcast 14 brings a lot of the key content together. If you want to skip to the meaty part directly, have a listen to podcast 14.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast – Episode 14 - The Other Side of Crypto That Nobody Is Talking About
Either way, there is LOTS to dig on here.
__
Anyone who has been into crypto for 5 seconds knows that its not anonymous and was never intended to be...its a public ledger. But while that sounds scary it actually has its upsides too. But Bitcoin is the most secure decentralized network. Its really an amazing asset when you really study it. And yes some cryptos are more centralized than others. Every crypto has to decide where they want to land in the trilemma of security, decentralization or scalability. But digital assets are going to be a key part of the future.
I was going to downvote you for using trilemma which sounds like corporate talk...but apparently that word is from the 17th century. 👌
It's a perfectly cromulent word that embiggens one's vocabulary.
Cool to learn a new word!
I've never heard a corporation use a word like that.
Well that I guess your just not synergistically shifting the paradigm.🙄 looks like we have a critical path failure preventing Q3 teams to efficiently enable cross functional e-markets.
I get what you're saying, but understanding phonetics will allow you to break down the word "trilemma". That definition cannot be obfuscated in the same way the corporate-speak you posted can.
Learn a new word every day. Looks like there's a quadlemma and pentalemma too
Disagree.
First, the cabal completely controls every computer out there. They write the software, they write the OS, they produce the hardware, they own the internet. This is not a level playing field, and you can't beat them on it.
Second, the problem with gold is that if we admit gold is money again, "they" will always be richer than us (European banks, China, Russia all have more gold than we do). But, the same problem exists with bitcoin. How much does China control? How much does "Satoshi Nakamoto" (i.e., the CIA) control? If they have an appreciable percentage of crypto currency, we're admitting they're richer than us and always will be.
Third, the future of currency is silver, not electronic fiat tickets. Metals have no counterparty risk, which crypto has. Things were good in 1913, which is why the cabal had to create the Fed, print money, and knock us off the gold standard. We should be going for what the cabal doesn't want us to have, not fiddling meta-tier bits on a computer wholly controlled by them.
Lastly, yes, "they" do NOT want us to own metals. They don't seem to care about crypto. If they did, they'd be doing to crypto as they've been doing to metals: selling ever more paper crypto to keep the price of crypto down and discourage investment. Instead, they're pumping it, dumping it, pumping it, dumping it. Of course the people who bent the rules to thwart the GME gamma squeeze, the people who frickin' froze the LME and reversed trades when the nickel short was revealed, of course those people know when to buy and when to sell.
Buy silver. In God we Trust, not in cabal-controlled computers.
Oh come on, they don't control 100% of the technology out there. It IS deeply compromised, but its not like there are no alternatives out there. Linux was made for this very purpose.
Even in crypto, which began as open source technology, there is a whole class of blockchains which respect and enforce users privacy. Bitcoin was hijacked by the cabal years ago but it began as simply a way to prevent centralized control of the issuance of currency. The one caveat is that a hostile entity could amass over 51% of the computing power and commandeer the whole network. That was a known risk from the very beginning. The cabal took over through a company called Blockstream that hired all the Bitcoin Core developers and forced out Gavin Andreson, the person who Satoshi left in charge. They then made several alterations to the core code and ruled the online communities through strict censorship of all discussion of what really happened, and through backhanded deals forbid any alternative implementations of the bitcoin client software.
But due to being open source, it could not be shut down. Many forks of bitcoin now exist, as well as many other original blockchain designs which are competing to replace legacy tech which IS 100% cabal controlled. Look into privacy coins, which are the opposite of CBDCs - funds are untraceable and completely invisible to all except whoever holds the private key.
On the Linux note, even that warrants caution. Canonical and Red Hat Enterprises have both had some questionable aims, and over 80% of home user Linux installations are a variety influenced by one of those two entities.
Even if something that is untainted and entirely open-source, I'll be honest: I wouldn't be able to verify it's clean if you set the source code in front of me, and neither could most people. I'd be reliant on some internet denizen to sound an alarm early enough on if something were amiss.
Yes, but you don't have to use those. Just with anything, you need to do your due diligence and use the "right" ones. Just like I look at the back small print of all my grocery store items and make sure they're not manufactured by brands I want to boycott.
You can use BSD even if you really want.
On one of the podcasts, it is pointed out that there is a backdoor built into every piece of operating software and all hardware that is built. It's there. Nothing is outside of that reach.
This is partly what Wexit is referring to, I think.
I have heard this and I can't say whether its true or not, but you have to draw a line somewhere as living like there's a backdoor into absolutely everything means you must accept that you already have no privacy.
Yes, the communists have infiltrated our tech at the deepest levels, but what exactly does that mean for them? What does it mean for cyber defense? Is it all a lost cause and we should accept defeat or give up all electronics? Or can we get educated about cyber security instead of saying "its too complicated and I don't understand computers"?
Then by that logic even Space Force is pointlessly compromised and we might as well just lay down and die already.
If Linux were harmful to their interests in any way, you wouldn't be able to access Linux, or they would be trying to ban Linux.
However, you are practically encouraged to use it. What does that tell you?
Even if your linux is trustworthy, which I doubt very much, that leaves the crypto software, the hardware, and the encryption algorithms, plus the complex manner in which they all interact.
Keep in mind, as well, that your adversaries are the same people who infected airgapped computers in an Iranian uranium enrichment facility with a virus that propagated VIA SOUND. If they wanted to attack linux or crypto, they would. They haven't, and so what does that tell you?
They don't even go after any of these things with the vigour with which they go after guns. Why not? A threat to their currency domination is FAR more dangerous to them than guns.
I'm aware of the rough history of it, but my complaint is more fundamental. Open source doesn't protect us, because so very few of us are capable of effectively auditing this software. And trusting existing audits is just "trust the experts" in a different context. We can't trust any software, we can't trust any hardware, we can't trust the internet, none of this says "let's start a brand new form of money built on this foundation!"
I don't have any faith in any publicly available public/private key system, or other encryption system. Why would governments create and give such encryption to their adversaries, for free?
In God we Trust. Computers are electric intelligence agents.
Ok mr cabal. Youll be using digital assets in the future with everyone else...you just dont know it yet
Nah
Doubt it. I've already moved way the fuck out the city, and now I'm trying to break into the barter trade system the farmers have going on out here. I can grow various veggies, I can produce eggs, and I can make a pretty good moonshine. I'm learning to make beer and kerosene too.
I hate the antichrist.
Even if they controlled every computer, if you have a hardware wallet (e.g. Trezor, Ledger, etc.) it doesn't really matter as so far, it has shown to be hack proof (as it is an external hardware device.) It is mandatory to have a HW wallet. And security companies have performed code audits and such on the hardware wallets.
For all of us, if you need to move locations quickly, good luck bringing gold and silver with you. (And I LOVE both.) You need something more portable in this day and age. And when you want to use gold and silver in everyday ways, you have a HUGE problem of IS IT REAL? Is it filled? etc.
Holding crypto is more secure than holding precious metals and I've been in metals for decades and crypto since 2013 (and ex IT guy). I still think you need both mind you but if you do not expose yourself to crypto (just like they say to put 5% of wealth in precious metals, do the same with crypto) you are not hedging for something that appears obvious.
On top of this, companies have poured in BILLIONS of dollars into crypto. Into ETH and all the other blockchains. This is so much bigger than BTC these days.
In God we Trust regardless.
Because it comes down to supply and demand, coupled with limited supply. Those billions were spread out, wait till they put a few billion into 1 smaller or mid tier crypto. Then you will understand.
Value comes from utility. We need a neutral money on the next. Not paypal, visa, bank transfer, etc. We agree on a handful (e.g. BTC, ETH, ADA, etc.) By the way, a very small amount of crypto is store of value - like BTC. The others are full on business projects (in a way) that is decentralized and is already being used in big (and small) business.
It isn't going away, though quite a bit of it will (e.g. shit coins, no use case, scam, etc.)
Bitcoin is more finite than gold...
It's only shown itself to be hack proof if you accept that "they" have been trying in earnest to hack it. Of course, when you consider that crypto is achieving "their" goals (it keeps money that is smart enough to recognize the petrodollar is dying from chasing gold and silver), you have to ask, "why would they hack it?"
How is any of this easier than metal coinage?
I agree right now metals are undervalued and thus require a lot of lugging around.
However, when the cabal's metals fixing schemes collapse, an ounce of gold will likely be $40k or more. At the same time, all of the bubbles around us will collapse, such that the price of a house will return to its true value, also probably around $40k or so for a middle of the road house.
One would be able to carry around enough money to buy multiple houses, in a single pocket.
In times past, gold coinage was barely used for day to day transactions. A busy city lawyer might have earned 40 gold sovereigns in a year in 19th century England.
This is only true if you trust the encryption that governments devised and gave to us for free so we could keep secrets from them. I don't, and I see no reason anyone should.
In God we trust, not in man-made software.
It's all still fruit of the poisoned tree. You can't trust any software or hardware or the internet.
No, the cabal doesn't write all the software...
You guys want to ban the carpenters from carrying saws and hammers because a murderer is on the loose and might use it to kill them.
No offense. But all you anti-crypto people are like the safety rep in a factory. You don't understand how it works or how it gets done. But you're afraid someone's going to hurt themselves so you cripple their ability to work by baning the tools they need because some idiot hurt themselves with it once.
Yeah, so stop trying to ban the blow torches.
Fur fuck sakes, I know Dave's an idiot, but the rest of us understand how to be safe around a cutting flame. Go bother the electricians.
Also what do you mean "end up in chains" in the future tense like that.
Now hold still so we can finish with the torch and you can tell the electricians to wear gloves.
Yes, the cabal writes all the software. Which software don't they write?
What? I don't want to ban anything
Not at all. Here we are discussing what will be "money" after the petrodollar dies. The cabal wants CDBCs. We can't decide if we want crypto or metals. I am describing the disadvantages of crypto as compared to metals.
You cannot trust any computer or any software. By contrast, you can, in God, trust.
No they don't, GitHub isn't a cabal hub of cabal employees pretending to write open source code.
If you want to understand open source freeware, watch Richard Stallman lecture on it.
GLLLLOOOOOOWWWWIIIIEEEE!!!
Check out its post history
Just a note. David Morgan, who created and posted the podcasts, is apparently involved with developing a gold-backed crypto.
So, you see, the "anti-crypto" moniker is neither accurate nor justified.
Look beyond the tech, and see what's going on in the larger picture. Entry point: Epstein. What does digging turn up? Did you even read ANY of the links, or did you simply get reactive to the (sloppily presented) assertions I made regarding bitcoin and crypto currencies? If so, mea culpa. But take a look. I was pretty gobsmacked when I began digging.
Where do you buy silver?
Check a local coin dealer or buy online at https://www.jmbullion.com/
There's a couple places in town that regularly have small amounts, I like to snap it up with cash.
For online purchases, I like silvergoldbull.com/ape (it's silvergoldbull.ca/ape for me).
When I'm in the States I order from JM Bullion.
And if I can't find a piece I want, apmex.com
A few other good stores, colonialacres.com, thecoinshoppe.ca, canadianpmx.com
Thanks very much for that Patriot.
Tracking all financial transactions means a paper trail of corrupt government handling of money. FOLLOW THE MONEY - - - Well this technology does just that. That would create abundance right there.
Could do the same for voting. Dead grandma wouldn't be able to vote 10 times. Seems like a good trade for "Oh no, someone might know I voted for Trump!".
Imagine, we wouldn't need the House to vote for us! 😎
Correct. Its always the ones who don't understand blockchains and how they work that cry foul. 100% if the time. Ignorance of the tech, and change rooted fear. There WILL BE digital assets known currently as cryptocurrencies. Its inevitable. Fight it all you want. Its coming. I remember when credit cards first came out. I heard this exact same rhetoric. Uninformed arguments against a financial utility that in the end, opened up retail flexibility, boosted monetary velocity, ect. Now almost everyone has a card in their wallet. Either credit or debit.
And you lived long enough to witness people being prevented from spending their money (by using a card), for various, arbitrary reasons, and yet you still doubt the truth after it has smacked you right in the face. How many times in your lifetime have you been stopped from making a purchase by card for..."reasons?"
Just because most people accept the risks of digital based transactions, it does not relegate those who are opposed to it (digital) as people who are "tech ignorant" or, embrace "uniformed rhetoric."
The truth of the matter is that everything digital can be stolen, just like all other material possessions. This includes elections, and Top Secret SAP military secrets, that even a dumb bitch like Hillary Clinton can steal, and hide in her basement computer server. I can promise you that your bitcoin isn't nearly as safe as you think it is.
And this is the argument always promoted in the face of those who raise objections and point out the problems.
"You don't understand it". Which is why you should really listen to podcast #14. This series addresses that objection many times over.
However, it should be pointed out that the podcast series does not, in itself, assert that cryptocurrencies or digital currencies are inherently bad. On many occasions, the speakers affirm that CC will be part of the future.
What they discuss is the fact that bitcoin is essentially pedo-coin, and that there is a MUCH bigger gambit at play here:
the crypto-psyop which has been to divert trillions of $$ away from the precious metals and into crypto in order to create a situation where the puppet masters can hoard the real assets - gold, silver and precious metals - to themselves.
You just proved his point... Crypto was not released for that. Bitcoin was released in response to the bank bailouts of the great recession of 2008.
It's in the white paper, read it. Bitcoin was released as a "Fuck You, signed: Everyone" to the bankers.
I don't understand why you anti-crypto people don't actually just read the actual literal documentation.
You guys never read the code, you never read the postings from the development community, you never go to the source when it comes to crypto.
Who said anyone is anti-crypto? Bit of a massive leap, there.
Moreover, you've made quite a lot of assertions here. "Crypto was not released for that. Bitcoin was released in response to the bank bailouts of the great recession of 2008"
How do you know? Do you know who wrote the white paper? Do you know who they are and are not connected to? Do you imagine that the white paper could NOT be written by a cabal operative(s) and still be written to look like X when the purpose is Y? That seems very naive to me.
Seems to me that a lot of people have a vested belief system in the crypto world, including bitcoin.
That aside, I cannot say I'm anti-crypto, or that in fact, the White paper and Crypto technology comes from the Cabal. The core assertion of the discussion in the podcasts is how there is evidence to support the theory that the tech has been hijacked and utilized by Cabal figures for a specific purpose, NOT that the technology itself is somehow bad of flawed.
Speaking of development, have you looked into the relationships between Epstein and bitcoin developer Wladimir Van Der Laan? Is this not relevant to a Q board?
What about Epstein and MIT Digital Currency Initiative?
Is none of this relevant because its miracle bitcoin, the solution to the central bank cartel?
Why was Epstein so involved? Why was he funding them? Why did they accept funding from Epstein?
Or should we just ignore this? Because, you know..... its bitcoin.
You mean, like the people that were receiving funding from Epstein?
my bank manager told me today that 50% of the banks have to be cashless by 2025. This falls right in line with the ISO20022 messaging standards being adopted. Backbone of that is XRP and XLM all the way.
Oh yeah, the elite invest in real estate I guess we shouldn't do that. The elite invest in the stock market I guess we shouldn't do that. The elite sell their stocks before the market crashes I guess we shouldn't follow them on that either. The elite try to influence culture for their benefit, I guess we shouldn't do that either. Hey bud the central bankers coins are what's coming and nothing can stop that. My bank manager just told me yesterday that 50% of their branches HAVE to be cashless by 2025. And scripturally speaking we know that the cabal will use this to eliminate who they they want from the financial system. SO you would seriously advice people not to invest in something because the Satanists use it? I guess I won't buy steak and calamari because evil Satanists enjoy those things. Well as the WEF says "you will own nothing and be happy" and that's specifically because you are NOT investing the way they do. Should we rather invest into something like Tornado cash that focuses on privacy...cause the feds just arrested the guy who made that lol. You ain't beating them in the financial sector boss.
Oh, and you understand them? Have you audited the entire software? Are you capable of saying with any real confidence that the software, plus the OS, plus the hardware, plus the internet, all interacting together, are perfectly secure and backdoor free?
In fact, your superior "understanding" is nothing more than faith in the experts.
In God we Trust, not in manmade computers and software.
GLOWIE ALERT !!! GLOWIE ALERT !!! GLOWIE ALERT !!!
32 lengthy posts in less than an hour
Reported. Get out you vile piece of shit
Bro, you are the only one who thinks this.
Note: a comment is not a post.
You are comparing credit cards and cryptocurrencies? With credit cards you have their money and can decide whether you want to repay it or not, with cryptos they have your money and can decide whether they want to pay it or not.
Literally: no. You need to read the source code for these projects.
You are actually promoting a literal, demonstrably wrong, lie.
That is not how it works. To fix your analogy:
With credit cards: you spend their money if they let you.
With crypto: You request to spend your credits on the network and then the miners do a bunch of work to make sure you're not a cheat, then they all cross-reference and double check each other and democratically vote on whether or not any one is a liar. Then if all these security processes are done, you spend your credits.
Lol, did you read it? And fully understand it all? And you're confident that, in interacting with the OS, the hardware, and the internet, that there are no holes or backdoors?
If you say "yes" you're a faggot liar.
Enter decentralized wallets... catch up buddy.
I thought they were all decentralized from the start. Wasn't that the initial incentive to buy, separation from the establishment? Now we are creating new decentralized wallets differentiating them from the previous decentralized wallets?
Insert pic of two wojacks pointing in breathless amazement at "decentralized wallets"
Who wrote the software? Can they be trusted? Did you audit it yourself?
It can be an anymore depending on how you handle it or what tokens you use.