u/RealCleanUpPhilly posted this about foreign particles found in the vaccines by Italian scientists:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTb7H1oB/study-finds-94-of-vaccine-recipi/c/
I shared this with a scientist friend of mine. He's actually worked with bacteria and viruses, and even worked on developing a vaccine (which was rejected b the FDA).So, he is rather familiar with viruses. Lemme post his comments on the "COVID-19 vaccine":
This is not a real vaccine. The body needs to see the actual virus to have an immune response. The spike proteins are only the mechanism that the virus has to get inside a cell to infect it.
So this so-called "vaccine" is flooding the body with the shit that damages cells, hence the heart problems, blood clots, etc. No immune response, or rather not an adequate response. You need the actual virus. The body builds antibodies based on the virus. Kinda like a negative photograph. The antibodies bind to the virus and render it inactive. Not the stupid spike proteins.
The spike proteins are damaging cells and the body is probably responding to the damaged cells. When a cell gets damaged, the body will destroy the sick or dying cell. So you get a bunch of spike proteins. The target cells get damaged and the body is cleaning up the mess. I am sure there is some sort of immune response, but not adequate to protect against the actual supposed "COVID virus." The immune system is trying to get rid of the spike proteins along with flushing out the damaged cells. Hence myocarditis, blood clots, etc.
The liver is a filter, so its trying to filter out that spike protein. The mRNA from the spike protein is recombining with liver cell DNA. And the liver cells, when they replicate will express these spike proteins on their cell walls. So, the body is replicating spike proteins via the liver cells, but not the virus itself. If the virus was there and active, the body would become a virus-replicating machine. A virus uses spike proteins to gain cell access, take over the cell replication mechanism used to read and replicate the cell DNA by inserting its own DNA or RNA into the mix, the cell then cranks out more virus particles. Then the cell collapses and the viruses go on to other cells and repeat. This stupid spike protein is only damaging the cells that they target. There is no actual virus contained in the "vaccine." So cells get damaged, but not turned into a virus factory and the body does not have the virus to make antibodies. So you will still get sick if exposed to "COVID". There are no antibodies to protect them.
The spike proteins are causing damage to the cardio pulmonary system. Then the liver is trying to filter that junk out and it ends up expressing the damn proteins on its cells walls.
This explains why the clot sots are useless against actual viral immunity, and why people are suffering myocarditis. This doesn't even get into the mRNA function that reprograms one's DNA to give them autoimmune deficiency syndrome, nor the mysterious objects found in the vials like crystalline structures, sharp metallic objects, or creepy squiggly objects moving about. Even ignoring all that scary crap, these injections are a fraud regardless.
I've been on this forum since the week of its inception as it branched away from TheDonald.win. Don't call me a shill. I get pretty tired of this "JFK Jr. is alive and if you disagree then you are a shill" or "The moon landing is fake and if you disagree then you are a shill" or "The world is flat and if you disagree then you are a shill." It's stupid. Now you're coming at me with "Viruses aren't real and if you disagree then you are a shill." Take a step back and relax.
I have watched videos you have mentioned. It's like that guy on the Stew Peters show who is a "doctor" (of chiropractory) who says that the world's water supplies have all been poisoned with snake venom when it is far more likely that a virus has been modified with the DNA from snake venom. Actually, I did bounce that idea off my friend and he says it is definitely possible. I've never worked with an electron microscope myself, but I know that they can be used to see viruses.
I think I can come maybe halfway in agreement with you and say that the puffy things that they constantly show on TV to scare people are most likely not viruses. They could be exsomes. But going off half-cocked and accusing me of being some FBI shill or whatever because I do not cling to your conspiracies pushed by laymen who perhaps don't know the whole picture is immature.
I think that a lot of the "viruses are not real" and "Earth is flat" people on this site, and other sites, are actually "professional disinformation specialists", perhaps even paid by the likes of Soros, to try and discredit alternative news sites, by promoting the most outrageous things as a way of discrediting reasonable doubts, and even trying to discredit documented things like the 2020 election fraud.
It could be. It's strange how they are quick to accuse others as "shills" when they disagree with them. It could be a standard tactic for all I know/care.
I'm not sure about flat earth folks as I have yet to see or hear any actual evidence or logic concerning it, but to answer the question of viruses all you have to do is listen to a virologist explain how "isolation" is done.
I'm really not sure why people who have listened to it carefully are labeled as crazy here, not to mention bashed along with flat earth in the same breath, though I may have a theory similar to yours.
On th contrary it is expert medical virologists and scientists who say this...some people can't be bought..and are not part of the scam that
a.. there's such a thing as a virus...CDC UK Canada Ireland Wuhan Germany south Africa..tons more..have confessed they have no isolate of sars two...and CDC admit there is no isolate of any so called virus ever....ever....
b exosomes are dead tissue cells
Are we done?
I see that a lot lately on this website too, it's almost like what the left does. IF you don't fall in line with our deluded way of thinking than we're going to bully you, and call you names.
One video on bitchute can easily be disinformation disguised in a clever way to make patriots believe non sense, to throw us off the trail. I'm on the fence of what viruses actually are. You can't discount that people get sick when they're around other sick people, so I don't know how these ViRusEs ArEn'T rEal ideas can hold any water.
Thanks, fren! I really don't come here to get upset with others. If I see stuff I disagree with, I will say so, but I'm not like that kid Jason in Robotech who points his finger and shouts, "An ENEMY SPY!"
I think viral transmission is very well contestable. I've read about how it's been tested to the point where someone sick with the flu can spit into a healthy person's mouth and the person still won't get sick. Pretty gross, but I hope the people involved were paid well. I think it comes from people's immune systems getting caught off-guard. Not getting enough sleep, eating crappy food, etc. Plus some people just never get sick. My wife is one. I think it has to do with her overactive liver that she has to take medication for. Something like if it isn't kept in check, her liver will somehow attack her body. Weird. But as a result, she very rarely ever gets sick. Usually my daughter and I would get sick while my wife is fine. So glad that my daughter and I both caught a flu in January 2020 before all this "PCR test" nonsense rolled out, before the Diamond Princess docked in Yokohama harbor and started this all. Neither of us have been sick really since then. I've come a long way learning about so much of this stuff. Quercetin is potent! God be with Dr. Z's soul and I would not doubt it if his cancer was an assassination to get rid of him (like what probably did with Jack Ruby).
Its a highly contestable issue. There is NOTHING in the historical and ongoing debates to justify a non professional here saying without qualification "Viruses aren't real" or even perhaps "there's no such thing as a living virus" (a bizarre assertion that now centers on what "living" means, since viruses categorically maintain a "life cycle" based on its manipulative or invasive strategies). Really the only basis for that sort of certainty statements is one side advertising and presenting more convincingly than the other. But a convincing presentation on the Internet is fraught with problems when it comes to discerning the truth of a matter.