This past week GAW has been under heavy shill attack, pushing division on anything having to do with the pedo groomer issue. Too many pedes took their bait! Would you love to see fewer crazy/gay/whatever stickies on GAW? DEPORT! And leave the shills and other assorted losers to your mod team! THX!
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 Toruble Maker 💊
Bit of a political pacifist here as I try to follow Jesus. He never wrote a book or built a physical church, his power was his idea: you do not need the institutions of men to ascend, you need remission from sin.
Therefore, a good political value to uphold: let's not kill each other as political solutions.
Removing killing each other as options, and collectively withdrawing consent from those in power who kill to solve problems..... this is our common ground!
13 countries on the planet have laws to kill gays, and 4 follow thru. Trump wanted to end this and was the first to even hint at tackling it.
For you Christians.... is God's promise after the flood, the rainbow, applicable to politics? Is it a viable spiritual response to promise not to kill your political enemies?
Not following you here. How does the rainbow apply to politics? It was God's promise to never flood the entire earth again.
A system was built up on the earth, that called themselves gods. The flood destroyed that civilization.
A system is building up, that someday, a man, the abomination of desolation, will again call himself God.
Our response is not to wipe out this system, to not kill and purge. But to spread the good news that you don't need an institution to ascend.
Ascend to what, fren? What do you mean? What do you need?
Self-actualization is another word for it
Pretty much where I am at, fren. I learned just how hyper insecure Christian Fundamentalists, in this group at least, really are. We also learned how many will accept a tyrannical theocracy if it agrees with their personal views. A lot of this... was a reflection of my past ugliness, which is why I have less patience for fundamentalists than I do leftists. Jesus expects better out of us and when I see that shit permeate still, I try to correct it so others don't go through the same empty life that I did...
We need to learn to respect other people's lives. Adam and Steve plugging each other's cornholes across the street are not the ones ruining your life. It's the faggot fucks in DC and in the pedophile elite who are the problem. They're distracting you with Adam and Steve so you don't concern yourself with their crimes while you simultaneously turn a blind eye to your own problems. Christians have a log of issues ranging from Divorce to pedophilia problems to greed that they need to be more focused on and fixing instead of worrying about Adam and Steve's specks. Or they can do what you and I did, see man made religion for the lie that it is and embrace a personal walk with Jesus. My personal relationship with Jesus is between Him and I. As is yours and His. And everyone else individually. Fundamentalists fail to grasp this because they think they have it figured out. Their institutions preach about how horrible and lost the world is and that they need to save it... the problem is, Jesus already did. People need to choose for themselves and that's what these hyper insecure narcissists can't accept. It's like, because they choose a life of righteousness, everyone else must do the same- they're like Communism, but with a religious figure.
I am of course broadstroking. This doesn't apply to everyone and if you are reading this and feel content in your life an community, great! I'm glad you found that. Your community, however, does not absolve the problems of all the others. Nor does it grant you authority above everyone else. And that's ultimately what it all comes down to: accepting that you have authority over yourself and no one else and no Jesus is not commanding you to exert authority over others. That has been the excuse of tyrants for thousands of years. None of it is at all accurate to the character of Chris depicted in Mathew, Mark, Luke and John.
The thing about actually being right is that you don't need to feel vindicated. You simply know and you accept that if others want to be wrong, that it's okay for them to be wrong. I used to believe I knew all and was better than everyone only to realize that out of 6,000 active religions and 8 billion people it was absurd to assume I was born into the correct faith. I can say with certainty that I am on the right path, but that is applicable to me. I am happy to share and debate ideas, but no one here on this Earth will ever tell me what or how to think. Not even Jesus forces the issue so what makes you think you're gonna win anyone over trying to control them and forcing your worldview on them.
That got away from me. Oh well.
Good comment!
I’ve said before that a big part of the great awakening and the war we are fighting is people finding which side they’re really on.
As I’ve found with some of my fundamentalist friends who agree with my views on Christ, but are more interested in church-based purity tests in their government and less interested in the teachings and examples of Jesus.
Turns out, many people I agree with in faith, are happy to “eat ze bugs” and force everyone else to as well as long as it’s “the right kind of Christian” forcing people to do so, and of course No Mean Tweets.
Likewise, many people I don’t agree with on everything, just want to be left alone like me. They’re ok if Trump is a little bit of a Christian but not a full fledged evangelical Christian, as long as he doesn’t force us to “eat ze bugs and like it”.
Some are still finding their side, and I think some people will be surprised who they end up fighting alongside, and some will be surprised which side of history they end up on. Some for the better, and some for the worst.
Lol … again, reasonable. You have quite the fan club 😂😂😂. Some would call that “over the target”, or “danger close truth”.
The Christian community still has not asked why the Bible found opportunities to call out homosexuals and so many other sins but not one time dose it or anyone in it anywhere call out pedophiles. The word is never used. It talks about men with men. Straight men with the wrong woman at the wrong time. Hell just thinking about other women but never found an opportunity to say don’t have sex with kids.
It’s makes some wonder who put it together and translated it. It makes some wonder if it was done on purpose and what else could have been changed.
Others just know they are right and unwilling to accept that maybe they were lied to and manipulated as well.
I’m surprised so many, especially those who follow Q, have not sussed this out yet. It’s supposed to be an awakening but people are still sleeping.
Mark 9:42 “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea.”
This is quite literally the only time I'm aware of in the Bible where Jesus himself makes a specific promise of punishment for a specific crime. And it's crimes against children.
The English translation doesn't quite put this in context, but the gist in the original Hebrew is that, there is a specific punishment God has set aside for those who harm children or cause them to sin (and pedophilia is certainly included in this list) that is so horrible, unnerving, and just downright terrifying, that it would be better for them to just go ahead and kill themselves and go to hell in an attempt to avoid it.
Think about that. Hell is better than what God has in store for these people. So yes, the Bible DOES address this issue, in a freaking wonderful manner.
You know the old world was full of pedophilia. The Roman’s and all. So it was on their minds just not acknowledged. That makes me wonder.
Who said this, “ You're wrong, and incapable of refuting any of my points” ?
Two threads multiple lengthy comments. You have yet to refute one single point I have made.
In fact you blatantly ignored everything I said so that you could continue your point.
Is says nothing about pedophilia. It says, “someone who causes on of these little ones to sin”. Other translations say “one that offends one of these little ones”. But what offends them and who decides that? Where are the offenses stated like they are done so clearly with everything else?
Again if the sin is so wrong why was it not directly acknowledge. Why does it point out so many types of sexual promiscuity so many times but not say anything about pedophilia?
I am not advocating for pedophilia by making this point. I am not suggesting that if the Bible doesn’t say its bad it’s ok.
I’m just saying why do we all assume everything is corrupted but our personnel understanding of religion? We need to start asking the hard questions. It’s very possible it was removed from the Bible or instead translated to homosexual.
Btw, appreciate the acknowledgment. Lol I do respect you allot.
Bless your heart. You’ve got a lot to learn.
Can confirm … I am a rabid anti-lesbian. I take serious issue with them. Mostly because I sometimes wish I was one. They have high-jacked way too many of our dimes (hot chicks). Im not talking about the butchies on butchies of course. I tots understand that choice for themselves. Yeah, “you do you” I say. But, in the context of our 7+‘s … come on … at least be willing to share.