Well, boys, are you ready for ten days of darkness?
(www.bbc.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (187)
sorted by:
I have always been fond of Queen Elizabeth, even though I am an Irish girl whose aunts would clobber me for saying it. Her children, less so fondly. Her children are products of the 1960s influence, although Anne serves and lives a life in service and with her beloved horses (I would too!). Edward the youngest hasn't had too many issues.
I have felt for a long time, that many varied and seemingly outlandish conspiracy theories have been thrown into the mix of draining the swamp. Some of it I believe is meant to manage perceptions of the MAGA movement, in other words some of these very vocal supporters of various theories are here to make MAGA look crazy. I finally decided to guide my perceptions by following Trump and his team's lead. When they start confirming these other theories, then I will consider them. But until then, I try to use discernment that God gives to understand truth.
Fair enough, thank you for the reply. I'm open minded regarding her so it's interesting to hear various perspectives. Trump has left several messages on Truth social over the past couple hours honoring her memory so perhaps there is truth to what you're saying.
There is so much information from so many different directions, I want to err on the side of people being innocent until proven guilty. I cannot abide the mob mentality that pronounces people guilty based on hearsay. This is cancel culture! Due process and the presumption of innocence should always be given, even for the most egregious of crimes. In fact, a successful prosecution is wholly dependent upon a vigorous and fair defense of the person being accused. I don't know who is corrupt and who isn't and it is not my place to judge anyone. That's what trials are for and in the meantime, I want to do my part to uphold the rule of law, part of which is due process and innocence until proven guilty.
Agree. Sadly, this is a minority viewpoint.
No, no it isn't. The vast majority of people support this viewpoint. Some may make a conclusion personally but virtually nobody is saying that this personal conclusion should be the basis for punishment and are instead simply arguing for investigations.
Save of course for the radical minority of people but they're the exception not the rule.
Q has said 60% will remain hidden, 40% will be revealed. Trump's role requires him to operate in the mainstream and can only go so far in what he openly says. But he makes great use of steganography, hiding secret communications in plain sight, as the cabal does. There is a great deal of evidence to support many seemingly outlandish conspiracy theories. MAGA might look crazy for calling these things out, but only because they have been so hidden, not because they are untrue.
No one should believe every theory suggested, but many anons have researched deeply and can interpret the cabal's codes and symbols that communicate so much more. For those wanting to fight this battle, there's no point in cracking the enemy's code and then saying, "I'll only consider evidence that's out in the open."