What I agree with is something that traditional Europeans / Scandinavians have maintained is a natural distinction between nudity and acts of sexual arousal. That distinction has been (deliberately?) blurred in American culture. So we (Americans raising families) have to navigate this wisely:
On the one extreme, not buying into this bizarre bodily shame neurosis and pretend sex is only dirty or doesn't exist and any nudity is included in that.
And on the other extreme, this push to include mature post-pubescent sexual dynamics into the life and experience of the child, with no considerations for psychic damages that will cause for the child, whether it comes from other members of the family or the hedonistic culture at large.
The leftist perverts simply want to break down boundaries, which damages a young person's identity since it relies so heavily on the foundation of familial relationships that are defined by those boundaries.
We should expect sick leftists to act sick, but we should not expect our liberal friends and co-workers to tolerate this. That's where the real frustration lies.
True, on one extreme end are the prudes, and on the other extreme end are the ones over "sexualizing" children. On the side of the "sexualizing" children, one can debate at what age it is appropriate. Clearly the woke lefties are setting the bar way too low.
Yes, distinguishing between acts of sexual arousal and nudity is important. This is mostly done in Europe, though I would say more in the northern part than in the southern. I have no science to back it up, but I have a feeling that English speaking countries tend to be more on the prudish, side equating nudity with sex.
What I agree with is something that traditional Europeans / Scandinavians have maintained is a natural distinction between nudity and acts of sexual arousal. That distinction has been (deliberately?) blurred in American culture. So we (Americans raising families) have to navigate this wisely:
On the one extreme, not buying into this bizarre bodily shame neurosis and pretend sex is only dirty or doesn't exist and any nudity is included in that.
And on the other extreme, this push to include mature post-pubescent sexual dynamics into the life and experience of the child, with no considerations for psychic damages that will cause for the child, whether it comes from other members of the family or the hedonistic culture at large.
Good post.
The leftist perverts simply want to break down boundaries, which damages a young person's identity since it relies so heavily on the foundation of familial relationships that are defined by those boundaries.
We should expect sick leftists to act sick, but we should not expect our liberal friends and co-workers to tolerate this. That's where the real frustration lies.
True, on one extreme end are the prudes, and on the other extreme end are the ones over "sexualizing" children. On the side of the "sexualizing" children, one can debate at what age it is appropriate. Clearly the woke lefties are setting the bar way too low.
Yes, distinguishing between acts of sexual arousal and nudity is important. This is mostly done in Europe, though I would say more in the northern part than in the southern. I have no science to back it up, but I have a feeling that English speaking countries tend to be more on the prudish, side equating nudity with sex.