Yeah, it was totally an Airplane... For sure.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (104)
sorted by:
Building 7 was my first red pill regarding 9/11. Even normies will admit that they believe it was brought down independent of the other buildings.
Agreed. That was my first red pill as well. It is one that is difficult to deny. The building fell down without being hit by any plane and did so just as if it was being expertly demolished.
If people tell you it was on fire so could have fallen down ask them to find another modern, steel-framed building that fell all the way down when it caught fire. There isn't one.
I've had my suspicions all along from the way the buildings pancaked but I hadn't even heard of Building 7 until nearly 20 years later. I'll be honest on how my last doubts were wiped away, it was the episode of Timcast with Alex Jones where he mentioned Building 7 and seconds later the stream mysteriously went dead for several minutes. Discussion being killed in real-time by YouTube was something I had never seen before then.
In the same way 'given enough time your boiling water will melt your steel kettle" /s
It doesn't get hot enough to do that and will be turned to steam like the jet fuel will turn to smoke. So why do people believe laws of nature was put on pause that morning.
Jet fuel burns fast and wouldn't stay around for so long and the office stuff that was ignited wouldn't be hot enough to melt the steel.
9/11 was my wake up call, I came home from school and saw how the towers collapsed, they didn't buckle and snap off the part that was above the collision point.
There was no reason for the framework below the collision point to fail, if anything they had less weight to hold up.
It clearly fell into itself perfectly, little 13 year old me knew instantly.
"There was no reason for the framework below the collision point to fail"
"no reason"