Nationalist Freedom loving Pierre Polievre wins leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada
(media.greatawakening.win)
🇨🇦SMEAR PLAN COMING 🇨🇦
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
The following information is to further investigate. Pierre Polievre could be a Trojan horse. Here's why. In 2021, Poilievre was listed on the WEF as is noted in this archived page. We also noted that two other prominent politicians were removed from the WEF site the week of February 22, 2022; Doug Ford(Ontario PM) and Andrew Scheer. Screen shots taken prior to their removal are available in our library, and can also be seen archived on the same site that referenced Poilievre, [here](https://web.archive.org/web/20220222040306/https://www.weforum.org/people/doug-ford) and here. Arguably, being listed on the WEF website doesn't necessarily mean that person is a willing or witting member. It is interesting that this is timed prior to elections. We did reach out to Mr. Poilievre’s office and asked if he could explain why he was listed on the WEF site when he is claiming he has never been involved with the World Economic Forum. At the time of writing we have not yet received a responses.
For the past two years, the Federal Conservative party has been generally quiet on all of the restrictions placed up on Canadians, and Conservative Provincial Governments have had some of the harshest restrictions in the country. Why, now and only recently, are freedom and Charter Rights part of the Conservative platform? One has to wonder if the national outpouring of support of the Freedom Convoy played a role in determining a favourable election platform. Or is it because now Poilievre is in a position of leadership and able to speak freely about his views? But if that’s the case, why was he on the WEF website?
Pierre Poilievre claims he was never a member and requested that his name be removed from the WEF website. We'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. If further information suggests he is deceiving Canadians, then it must be exposed.
There are many political serpents. We mist be at least as wise as serpents to expose their lies.
https://www.beyondthenarrative.ca/poilievre-and-the-wef/
Like how Tulsi "snake" Gabbard has a Rumble channel and a Truth account, she so wants us to think she's a mythical good Demoncrat.
Every "good" Democrat has fallen in line when it actually mattered most. The party is rotten within and without. At least right now, the Republican party is being taken over by a group of people who have the capacity to think progressively and conservatively, who realize that it's time to progress past the current Republican party and conserve our country's values
She wants to have the power. She's another Trojan horse. Tucker Carlson seems to be mesmerized by her. Spellbound. Behind the scene, they keep pumping her that she will be the next democratic nominee for president. That is, if Biden is gone.
It is controlled opposition grabbing conservative/normal thinking voters who would vote patriots parties otherwise.
Here in Germany we also have a "Tulsi Gabbard" = Sarah Wagenknecht (The Left) who talks very patriotic, reasonable, normal and is uncovering the lies of the Plandemic and "Putin's war". She has established a huge fan base since last year, is heavily attacked in her own communistic party, but still stays in the party and therefore works for them. The Left would be nothing without her.
They are preparing the masses to vote for financial help through the government and for taxing the rich, when shit hits the fan this winter. But it is only leading to "You will own nothing and be happy, everything will be rented".
"Tax the rich" generally means "Tax the (Independent) rich".
They are the primary competition to the establishment rich. The establishment rich will utilize the lower classes to democratically rob their competition -- ironically, depriving the lower classes of any potential allies with resources.
That is my concern, but the extent of the evidence does come down to that web page.
Where his wife escaped Venezuela, and was likely taught to be anti-commie. He's the only of the candidates to speak with the trucker convoy (though others had shown support).
Now we just need an early election somehow.
One play from the Castro playbook was to utilize refugee and exile populations to cover infiltration. These infiltrators are taught to lead the opposition and appear to be very anti-communist, and well spoken/educated. From Cuba, many were children at the time of their "exile", but were indoctrinated and trained very thoroughly. They typically appear to be extremely anti-communist. You can identify them by how well their families are doing back in Cuba -- if you can dig that info up by talking to refugees who left more recently. Even obedient peasants are kicked around like dogs in a communist nation, so if you see the family of a "traitor" has military officers, politicians, managers etc within their family back home, then very likely the "exile" has been a very good infiltrator.
For a refugee girl to link up with a politician in a nation that has been so thoroughly infiltrated by communism is too convenient and specific. Most refugees marry within their own class and of their own ethnicity. Preservation instincts (culture, ethnicity) are very strong with refugees.
Venezuela is the successor to Castro. Cuba is not the head of that regime anymore, operationally, Venezuela was a more beneficial successor.
Watch the wives, right?
You raise valid points, I lack concrete information to rebuke. If/when I have time, I will try to dig into that further.
Until then, this was the presumptive outcome long ago, I remain cautiously optimistic and do intend to hold his feet to the fire in the little ways I can if req'd.
Oh, I wasn't aware of that one. I did know that Baber was strongly anti-mandate, I was upset that a) he got as little support as he did and b) Charest managed to get 16%.
Same with Nikki Haley, she is a WEF member.
I don't fully trust him because of his views on abortion.
Good information. I didn't know this. The abortion view tells us a lot about the politician. Typically, these are RINOs, who favor a wetted finger to tell them which political wind will carry them the farthest.
I believe one's views on abortion is almost a guaranteed insight into their soul. Before becoming a Christian, I was super pro-abortion, but not long after becoming a Christian (my change in abortion viewpoint wasn't instantaneous), I realized the evil of abortion and you won't find too many people more pro-life than me now.
He has addressed this, that he wrote a paper when he was in school that caught their attention and they put his name on their website as "future leaders". That doesn't mean he wasn't lying about that. Unfortunately, a similar question mark was raised with Max Bernier.
That doesn't mean he's anywhere near perfect, but I hope he just took popular stances on to not hurt the numbers on issues like Ukraine.
Then there are things he focused on like getting people from other countries better able to work in their field. That's great, but we should reduce the numbers of immigrants (illegal immigration happens, but is so limiting on lifestyle to not get caught that it can't really be that huge, unless they are also able to get ID and that's a bigger problem).
Bottom line is that he might be a reprieve we need, but is important to hold it to him, because conservatives tend to be lions when powerless and weak when they are in a position to do something.
Another commentator, u/Julia_J wrote that she didn't like Pierre Polievre views on abortion. The abortion view tells us a lot about the politician. Typically, these are RINOs, who favor a wetted-finger to tell them which political wind will carry them the farthest.
It is sounding like you may be right though. Pierre Polievre "might be a reprieve needed." Whether we like it or not, he's the hope of Canada at this point.
I agree with that sentiment, abortion and health care are two that even conservatives aren't willing to take a gamble on.
The thing that makes me trust his stance on the WEF is that he has said that no one in his cabinet will be allowed to be WEF members. I'm looking for the sauce on that but I'm certain I saw it not long ago in the news. He also has spoken against most of the WEF talking points that we talk about on here quite a bit. If he was a trojan horse, he would be finding more crafty ways to not criticize or attack WEF bullet points rather than going after them so directly.
No matter what, he's a FAR better option that we've had in Canada than anyone else in the last few decades. Everyone else has been either very vanilla Conservative and having no backbone to stand up to Trudeau with or corporate, boring shills.
Pollievre isn't perfect, but holy balls he's the best option we've had in my lifetime of 37 years.
I believe I read that DeSantis’s name was also wiped from the WEF roster. Those who belong/belonged are suspect.
Good to know information. All eyes should be very discerning. I understand that Vladimir Putin was on the list too. What this means I do not know. Apparently, it is an organization that has many levels of influence. The outer orbit is possibly people in the political sphere that one interacts with. I recall Trump himself standing on stage with Klaus "Vader" Schwab. It may not mean anything at all, but then again being listed on the WEF website doesn't necessarily mean they're 'there' by hook, line, and sinker. Our job is to find out. There are plenty of real life 'Serpents' out there that would like to have us all fooled.