The government’s official explanation is that the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued created a pancake collapse.
NIST “found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.”
Just the weight of the upper floors would be enough to collapse the building, don't you think? That was a lot of weight coming down. And the fires didn't help the situation. Those planes hold a HUGE amount of fuel and the plane itself was very heavy.
Absolutely Not...They were the Strongest buildings ever built that had a solid steel internal frame and a Secondary solid metal frame on the outside...Its impossible for the floors to "Collapse" into each other at that speed...Never...Go watch some Videos on Buildings that have collapsed/ pancake style like they like to refer to the WTC collapse as..."Pancaking"
Yeah to fall directly straight down, NOT. How does the weak side where the plane entered fall at exactly the same time as the other side that wasn’t penetrated? It wasn’t a through and through shot like a bullet.
Was that you mentioning the penny?
I think that plane went a ways in, don't you? Did it hit the building and then just drop down to the street?
It was a HUGE explosion. Over 40,000 gallons of fuel!
I see the floors of the building like a line of dominoes.
This is the nosecone of a plane being hit by a single BIRD...And you want to tell me these planes penetrated an outer skeleton of the building made of steel with reinforced concrete...???? Yeah OK....
You are not defending your position very well. If I bird could do that much damage what about a building? I'm sure the building wasn't moving but the plane sure as shit was!
Lol...Seriously...You Can believe whatever you want fren...whatever floats your boat...If you still believe that Planes caused/began the complete destruction of Steel and concrete towers specifically designed to withstand such incidents....Do some research...
We'll both believe whatever we want. As far as me, I have a lot of research to do on top of other duties. But hey, it's been fun and thank you for being so civil fren.
No, I don't. The building didn't all of a sudden add weight just because some beams were weakened. The notion that every single beam/column, floor by floor, was compromised at exactly the same rate, uniformly, as all 100+ floors collapsed is preposterous, on its face. Yet, that's what you see occurring as the towers implode. Yes, implode.
The fuel would have exploded on impact (if there really was any), and it's simply not possible for an aluminum airframe to penetrate steel, and emerge on the opposite side with nosecone intact. Beyond laughable.
No way it just came down freefall from jet fuel. I don't care how much engineering you took in school. Anyone who's ever worked with, cut and welded steel first hand, can tell you there is no way. Thermite is certainly plausible...but it was controlled demo either way. Buildings NEVER drop straight down freefall speed without lots of help.
My husband who is a welder and I just said that. It might melt but at some place on the beam it would still be solid causing it to fall or lean sideways.
I don't believe the fire caused the collapse. But I didn't see a pressure wave either that would have happened in an explosion. The building fell in on itself. Period.
OK I give up. Please don't try to convince me with this BS! Gassed on the tarmac! yah right. And no workers were in those wtc buildings. Those people jumping from the building were dummies that the terrorist thru out the window, or they jumped out of the plane with parachutes that were photoshopped to delete the chutes.
Thermite is a material used in welding to melt metals together. It's a mixture of metallic aluminum and iron oxide (ferric oxide), which produces molten iron after a redox reaction. When the aluminum and oxygen in the mixture combine, the...
Seems there was thermite in the construction of the building? Looks that way to me.
So aluminum plane flies through steel wall and leaves a passport behind from one of the supposed terrorists full intact after collusion and fire? show me the science of that one too!
The government’s official explanation is that the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued created a pancake collapse.
NIST “found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.”
And they were the first buildings in history to fully collapse because of a fire...
Just the weight of the upper floors would be enough to collapse the building, don't you think? That was a lot of weight coming down. And the fires didn't help the situation. Those planes hold a HUGE amount of fuel and the plane itself was very heavy.
Absolutely Not...They were the Strongest buildings ever built that had a solid steel internal frame and a Secondary solid metal frame on the outside...Its impossible for the floors to "Collapse" into each other at that speed...Never...Go watch some Videos on Buildings that have collapsed/ pancake style like they like to refer to the WTC collapse as..."Pancaking"
The plane and the fuel WAS the explosive!
Yeah to fall directly straight down, NOT. How does the weak side where the plane entered fall at exactly the same time as the other side that wasn’t penetrated? It wasn’t a through and through shot like a bullet.
Was that you mentioning the penny? I think that plane went a ways in, don't you? Did it hit the building and then just drop down to the street? It was a HUGE explosion. Over 40,000 gallons of fuel! I see the floors of the building like a line of dominoes.
This is the nosecone of a plane being hit by a single BIRD...And you want to tell me these planes penetrated an outer skeleton of the building made of steel with reinforced concrete...???? Yeah OK....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4543186/bird-strike-boeing-737-sudan/
https://gizmodo.com/bird-strike-does-disturbing-damage-to-the-nose-of-a-737-1703062851
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pictures+of+a+planes+nosecone+after+being+hit+by+birds&atb=v314-1&iax=images&ia=images
You are not defending your position very well. If I bird could do that much damage what about a building? I'm sure the building wasn't moving but the plane sure as shit was!
Lol...Seriously...You Can believe whatever you want fren...whatever floats your boat...If you still believe that Planes caused/began the complete destruction of Steel and concrete towers specifically designed to withstand such incidents....Do some research...
https://www.quora.com/Were-the-Twin-Towers-designed-to-withstand-an-airplane-crash?share=1
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/history/index.html
We'll both believe whatever we want. As far as me, I have a lot of research to do on top of other duties. But hey, it's been fun and thank you for being so civil fren.
Building WTC 7 dude? Love your thoughts on that.
WTC7 had to come down, it saw too much!
No, I don't. The building didn't all of a sudden add weight just because some beams were weakened. The notion that every single beam/column, floor by floor, was compromised at exactly the same rate, uniformly, as all 100+ floors collapsed is preposterous, on its face. Yet, that's what you see occurring as the towers implode. Yes, implode.
The fuel would have exploded on impact (if there really was any), and it's simply not possible for an aluminum airframe to penetrate steel, and emerge on the opposite side with nosecone intact. Beyond laughable.
You may as well be promoting a flat Earth.
So now the guy who fueled the planes were in on the conspiracy too!
No way it just came down freefall from jet fuel. I don't care how much engineering you took in school. Anyone who's ever worked with, cut and welded steel first hand, can tell you there is no way. Thermite is certainly plausible...but it was controlled demo either way. Buildings NEVER drop straight down freefall speed without lots of help.
i am an aircraft engineer...Jet fuel do not burn hot enough to melt steel..even if it did would not take a building down like that without help....
My husband who is a welder and I just said that. It might melt but at some place on the beam it would still be solid causing it to fall or lean sideways.
I don't believe the fire caused the collapse. But I didn't see a pressure wave either that would have happened in an explosion. The building fell in on itself. Period.
nah
OK I give up. Please don't try to convince me with this BS! Gassed on the tarmac! yah right. And no workers were in those wtc buildings. Those people jumping from the building were dummies that the terrorist thru out the window, or they jumped out of the plane with parachutes that were photoshopped to delete the chutes.
I know. I also know people actually died that day. What about the plane that crashed in PA? Were those people in on the game?
Oh, here you are. And you knew people who died that day. Give me a break. Troll identified.
thermite
Thermite is a material used in welding to melt metals together. It's a mixture of metallic aluminum and iron oxide (ferric oxide), which produces molten iron after a redox reaction. When the aluminum and oxygen in the mixture combine, the...
Seems there was thermite in the construction of the building? Looks that way to me.
There's quite a bit of undeniable evidence for thermite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
So aluminum plane flies through steel wall and leaves a passport behind from one of the supposed terrorists full intact after collusion and fire? show me the science of that one too!
Did you see the planes hit the buildings? I did. Don't know anything about a passport. Sorry
It Cant...Not without some kind of detonation to make it implode/collapse into itself...Read more about the construction to understand it better...
The plane loaded with fuel WAS the explosive!
NO! big difference between a B52 and a B25. ludicrous to think a b25 is comparable to a 767.