Why use the word "majesty" then? Its a rather obvious reference to the Royals. That would be the reason for the post. Then, back to the overt, generic message, closing w/ can't "let this happen". Otherewise, there's no reason for the obvious reference to the Royals.
You are correct. It may very well be a reference to the hold the Queen as part of Pindar (P in Q vernacular) has on the USA.
I would add though that certain people have a tendency to read documents the wrong way, like the Paris Peace treaty of 1783-1789.
So, if the link is based on the first hypothesis, I can follow that one. If it is based on the second, I call it bullshit. Sorry. But that is a consequence of Common Core and failure of simple 8 grade text analysis.
It's followed by "Can't let this happen" To me this says "majesty" as in majestic not as in ruler.
Why use the word "majesty" then? Its a rather obvious reference to the Royals. That would be the reason for the post. Then, back to the overt, generic message, closing w/ can't "let this happen". Otherewise, there's no reason for the obvious reference to the Royals.
You are correct. It may very well be a reference to the hold the Queen as part of Pindar (P in Q vernacular) has on the USA.
I would add though that certain people have a tendency to read documents the wrong way, like the Paris Peace treaty of 1783-1789.
So, if the link is based on the first hypothesis, I can follow that one. If it is based on the second, I call it bullshit. Sorry. But that is a consequence of Common Core and failure of simple 8 grade text analysis.