Some will listen to their financial adviser till the day it all crashes. Some just can't imagine a world where this could happen but the writing is on the wall. There is no stopping this now and most importantly, it must happen. Essentially, we're going to let the Democrats in DC initiate the collapse under the guise of a gimped salvaging of the Great Reset. Then we will 'hijack' it and rebuild a better world they destroyed. They will take the blame for a world they tainted and destroyed and give us the impetus and opportunity we need to fix this mess.
If anyone is hoping the midterms will save this they're still in a coma. Nothing can stop what is coming. For anyone that's truly studied Q, do you really think it's just gonna be a soft reset and then we get back to work? No. As Q told us multiple times. Things are far worse than most can imagine. Half measures will not suffice. Another broken election will not suffice. Drastic times call for drastic measures and this is exactly why it's happening like this.
It's why we allowed them to steal it. Trumps job wasn't to save the current system. He told you in 2016 in his most famous speech. A speech Q posted multiple times. ' This movement is about REPLACING a failed and corrupt system. Not fix it. Replace it. Now consider how pervasive the deep state truly is and realize what is required to replace that.
A collapse of biblical proportions is the only way. Trump, with the guidance of advanced US military planning, thwarted the initial launch of the Great Reset then spent the rest of his term preparing the nation for this. The replacement.
When your enemy is making a mistake you don't interrupt them. The Deep state, in their desperation to regain control, stole an election but in doing so they sealed their fate. Trump's true work was setting the trap of the century which they fell easy prey to. These people are stupid. They made the mistake of underestimating the greatest military in history. A military that has been fighting these same dark families since it's conception.
So now we approach the final hour before the plunge. Dark times lie ahead but they are essential. Critical for this nations survival and humanities future. Much like chemo, this world has suffered from a malignancy for centuries and it must be eradicated. It will bring us to the brink but in doing so, it will unite us and give us the driving force needed to do what must be done.
Do not despair. True hardship is coming but it is exponentially better than the dark age they had planned for mankind. We will survive and together, we will herald a Renaissance that will lift man to the stars and beyond. The best is truly yet to come. Prepare accordingly. These are not the end times. This is just the beginning.
If Bill Still had known of a block chain QFS, wouldn't he have endorsed it?
Why? Again, the problem is who OWNS the currency. The currency we have is a debt to a certain group when we should have a currency that is a debt to ourselves. A blockchain isn't even necessary for that because, as you can see, a blockchain isn't even necessary for our current currency to be a debt to the money masters.
A blockchain is useful for preventing counterfeiting, but that's it. A blockchain is a permanent record of your transactions that can be seen by the entire public, except possibly in the case of Monero. What reason is there other than convenience why we should replace physical money with this?
Another thing to consider is the effort of Big Tech to lock down computer hardware to operating systems that they approve of. If people became even more reliant on computers than they already are such lockdowns will become easier.
How about every single bill marked with a blockchain hex code? Impossible to counterfeit and finite in quantity. This would prevent overprinting and devaluation. Since the number is finite, it can be tied to the value of a precious metal or tangible asset, without being actually backed by it. Something along the line of Putin fixing the value of gold to the ruble. This puts an anchor point on the currency value. That is really all that is needed, an anchor point that does not move around to prevent artificial inflation.
Well again, it comes down to who is doing the printing. If we had control of our currency instead of the fed, who deliberately overprints, then we wouldn't have the overprinting problem. Also, one thing noted in the documentary is how the colonies originally scaled how much currency is in circulation according to how much trade is occurring. Having a finite amount could pose a problem.
A finite amount of currency does two things, first it maintains the value of the currency at a fairly stable amount, secondly it virtually eliminates wealth dilution through inflation. Inflation is a tool to maintain the wealth of a few at the expense of the many. It confuses the valuation of virtually all goods over time and keeps the lowest economic tier of society in perpetual serfdom. The basic principle of currency is to create a medium of exchange of goods or services. It only has value that can be agreed upon by both parties in a transaction. Simultaneously it does have positives, it prevents hoarding of cash by people that like to hide currency or sit on vast piles of cash (burying currency, hiding it in your mattress) which takes currency out of circulation and limits the supply. So it isn't all bad to be able to print currency without having a fixed commodity tied to the value of your currency. There are undoubtedly other positives, however I think the penchant for manipulation and abuse is an unavoidable side effect. Ultimately I think a hard commodity based currency is far more difficult to manipulate, it has to be tied to a hard commodity that is increasing in supply in step with the population growth and expansion of people participating in the market and it has to be something of universal intrinsic value AND it must be something that can be obtained without a massive investment in infrastructure that allows a few select corporations to gain a monopoly over the production and supple.