I never stated any facts. He said, "It just makes no sense". I said do some homework on devolution and then tried to briefly explain it to him.
If someone says I don't understand, how do I lead him in a direction where he could understand? Maybe I should have said good luck finding the truth?
You are contradicting yourself.
"We save the Republic by creating a critical mass of awakened individuals who are aware of facts and truth."
If they can't understand something, the next step would be to lead them in a direction to understand it, like I did. Is that not what you are suggesting? How do they get awakened without showing them?
Proving a negative: proving the non - existence of that for which no evidence of any kind exists.
No, this is what you said. You chided the guy for not doing his "homework" on devolution, then stated the tenants of devolution as fact. Re-read your own post:
"You have not done your homework on devolution. Trump is a president in exile. He still controls the military. He let the deep state steal the election. By doing so he knew they would try to destroy the country. The military stands in wait, ready to step in at any point to stop any massive societal destruction. Everything is being documented and their crimes will be prosecuted when this charade is over."
I swear, I don't know if some of you are shills here to destroy this board or if it's just a matter of not being able to separate fact from theory. It's really tough to determine which is which sometimes.
I never stated any facts. He said, "It just makes no sense". I said do some homework on devolution and then tried to briefly explain it to him.
If someone says I don't understand, how do I lead him in a direction where he could understand? Maybe I should have said good luck finding the truth?
You are contradicting yourself.
"We save the Republic by creating a critical mass of awakened individuals who are aware of facts and truth."
If they can't understand something, the next step would be to lead them in a direction to understand it, like I did. Is that not what you are suggesting? How do they get awakened without showing them?
Proving a negative: proving the non - existence of that for which no evidence of any kind exists.
Here is a 23 part series- https://patelpatriot.substack.com/archive?sort=new
Here is a Newsweek article talking about devolution and what it would look like. Read the first 6 paragraphs. Matches exactly what we see going on today. https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-inside-militarys-top-secret-plans-if-coronavirus-cripples-government-1492878
https://prayingmedic.com/2021/08/04/a-summary-of-patel-patriots-articles-on-devolution/
https://rumble.com/vkkgmi-patel-patriot-devolution-was-strategically-planned-by-trump-and-the-militar.html
https://rumble.com/vwxud5-devolution-power-hour-cliff-high-interview.html?mref=lzerp&mc=3ifeq
https://rumble.com/vssdxu-clif-high-the-quiet-war-1422.html?mref=2oodx&mc=8wf7a
No evidence exists? I disagree.
...and so do I.
EDit :- it;S aLL sPecuLaTiOn.
You never stated any facts?
No, this is what you said. You chided the guy for not doing his "homework" on devolution, then stated the tenants of devolution as fact. Re-read your own post:
"You have not done your homework on devolution. Trump is a president in exile. He still controls the military. He let the deep state steal the election. By doing so he knew they would try to destroy the country. The military stands in wait, ready to step in at any point to stop any massive societal destruction. Everything is being documented and their crimes will be prosecuted when this charade is over."
I swear, I don't know if some of you are shills here to destroy this board or if it's just a matter of not being able to separate fact from theory. It's really tough to determine which is which sometimes.
Your post has a shit energy !
And yours has a glow energy.
Yes, I am outside the continental US but still working from Langley!
Your post on the other hand irrefutably has a shitty, putrid energy and is leaving a green, shit-smelling miasma in the thread. For reals. !