So, I've been thinking about how the mass media keeps people asleep and thinking the opposite of reality, especially when it comes to the Russia situation. Or should that be "the Western situation"?
I remember reading in history books that in WW2, when the war was declared over and that Japan had lost, the general Japanese citizenry outside of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were absolutely blown away in shock and mental fragmentation because they'd been hearing non-stop from the Emperor's radio broadcasts to keep fighting because Japan was winning.
I can see a similar situation happening here. The sleeping, media-fed population of the West will be baffled when the Western Deep State loses the game.
They won't know how to process it outside of further feelings of agitation at Russia, rather than agitation at the Deep State for being dishonest.
I started to think, how lucky we are to have this movement, that we may have a chance on all fronts to minimise the global harm done by these psychopaths, simply by providing counter-opinions and research in real time.
This info war can be taxing and mindshattering, but there's a chance to avoid complete and total mental break, which, in a world full of mind-control, is a helluva thing.
I don’t think it’s possible to cure reverse transcribed or altered DNA. It took decades of research to figure out how to reliably alter DNA via the jabs in the first place. Changing it back reliably without accidentally causing more side effects would be an even more Herculean task. Convincing people that your new concoction works after the first one is exposed would be near impossible.
On the plus side, while the jab is extremely harmful and deadly, it has not killed nearly as many people as rapidly as many (including myself) feared. To be fair, it’s hard to tell who the jab has killed because the side effects are so diverse and unique to each individual, but we’re not seeing millions drop dead in the streets. Not sure how people will react once they understand the full risk that the jab poses, but after some initial shock and unrest they’ll have little choice but to live out what time they may or may not have left.
I’m not even going to try to predict how many will eventually die, but it seems to me that it’s not going to be completely apocalyptic. Yes, we’re going to see population and labor shortages for a while, and we may have to wait a few generations to get our numbers back and wait for the corrupted DNA to die out, but I believe that ultimately it’s going to be something we can recover from.
Trump always says the best is yet to come. I personally don’t think near extinction of Americans is congruent with his boundless optimism.
What does that mean exactly? I don't believe population will ever again reach this level. The jab has likely left many of the young sterile. I suspect in a few generations we will see the numbers stabilize at a much lower level.
Already today population growth is in decline. Cultural and economic changes mean people are having fewer children because they just don't need them and modern technology provides for many other means of distraction and personal fulfillment. That trend is very unlikely to change even once we've taken back our planet.
Yes, the best is yet to come, but the end is not for everyone. "Near extinction" is a strawman. That has never been a serious concern. But a world with a much reduced population in perpetuity is a reasonable guess. The population spike of the last century has served its purpose in the divine plan. It won't be returning. I don't view this as being at odds with optimism.
Population, to my knowledge, doesn’t stabilize for very long. The world recovered from the mass death in WWII extremely rapidly.
So long as the birth rate stays above the replacement rate, population for any organism will increase unless it bumps into a limiting factor such as predation or lack of resources. Most projections factoring in these variables show the human population peaking at 11 billion people in the next century.
How quickly we recover from jab induced depopulation depends on the birth rate. Right now it’s low to be sure, but that’s primarily due to Left wing anti family indoctrination. Once that propaganda gets cleared out from our culture people’s natural inclination to have families will ensure our recovery and future prosperity.
' wait for corrupted DNA to die out' So, does that mean altered DNA doesnt pass on to an offspring? Idk how this works. My original guess is that, with shared blood with mother during pregnancy, the fetus would already have the spike protein 'message to replicate' in its bloodstream.
What I meant was that it seems like many who took the jab are either rendered infertile, or may die before they can reproduce after they took the jab. Some probably will be able reproduce, and so their children may get the corrupted genes as well. Lots of conjecture here, so ultimately we’ll have to wait and see how it all pans out.
I believe I understood your point. Ive asked a couple of times on these posts if altered DNA is passed on, in part of course, to a fetus. Also the mrna question too, ie, will mom's blood pass on the 'make more spike proteins for all of these cells'. I am going to assume the Pfizer crowd knows the answer already, just not anyone on here, yet. I would think the mRNA \spike protein is a definite 'yes' since it is mom sharing the blood directly with fetus. These times we are in now are like a bad sci-fi horror movie. 'Waiting for the other shoe to drop...' And that island of mixed breed creatures (in new England area) People better go down for this.
One more thing I just thought of; the mutated gene would only get passed to offspring if the mutation happens in the sperm or egg cells (or whatever cells produce those). If mutated cells only exist elsewhere, such as in muscle tissue, organ tissue, etc; then the offspring wouldn’t inherit the gene to make more; they would only get whatever spike proteins are in the mother’s blood supply.
If this turns out to be the case, depopulation may be less severe than we expect, at least after the people who directly got the jabs expire.
If the mother has spike proteins in her blood that will undoubtedly get to the fetus.
Whether the mutated gene gets passed on is contingent on which gene on which chromosome has been altered. Since each parent’s DNA gets split in half then shuffled to create new DNA, there is an approximately 50% chance of getting it from each parent. Then there’s also the question of whether the gene in question becomes dominant or recessive. If it’s a recessive gene then someone could be a genetic carrier without producing spike proteins, then if their offspring get both recessive genes they become a spike factory.
Genetics is complicated and not fully understood; screwing around with it often leads to unpredictable and undesirable results.