Responding to an NPC is not futile, as there are often countless silent lurkers reading your posts. Here are some responses to common attacks to the Q movement.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 HANDY RED PILL 💊
So the better course would be not to wake up? Not to see the truth? Not to resist for fear of losing? It wouldn't be the ultimate torture to persist in slavery or worse? They don't just want us dead, they want to kill us and eat us?
Curious how the only rational course of action corresponds to your fearful theory.
As a professional theorist, I will let you in on a few things.
First, a useful theory must explain not only the things we think we understand, but also the things we heretofore have not understood. Your theory would serve to explain only things that are imagined, And it cannot be verified.
Second, a useful theory must enable the prediction of events described by the theory, or it is only a post facto theory (from the present to the past).
Your theory (that "they" are trying to get us to awaken and see the truth) implies that we must get on board with their project and hasten it along. If they are performing evil, how can that be so? Your theory arrives at an ethical contradiction: we must assure that those who mean us harm are successful---so we can defeat them. "They," of course, are completely unaware of these considerations.
All of which indicates to me that this is not a useful theory. I know every theory has a proud father, but some are Ugly Babies, nevertheless.
No need for theories when you can look back at the playbook. They are trying to run back the same ideological battle that justified WWII. Communism vs the Nazism they’re hoping to provoke. And whether you like it or not, Operation Trust was a thing, a trap posing as anti-communists for the singular purpose of being able to identity the anti-communists so that they could be rounded up and gulaged and/or exterminated.
That’s a legitimate concern surrounding the motive of Q and it won’t be disproven until this whole fantasy is resolved one way or the other.
Well said. it’s a worthy threat worth contemplating.
You can only disprove an affirmation, not a negative. What do you think you would be proving? Theories cannot be proven, only used or rejected for being useless. But it is a step forward that you are swearing off theories.
Operation Trust involved a large population of known figures who had been turned in their loyalty in order to lure others. I don't see that pattern in the Q movement. Who is Q? Nobody knows. Has anyone been lured on the strength of personal trust? I doubt it. Do we trust Donald Trump? I think so, and for good reasons.
Also, Operation Trust resulted in a hall of mirrors, where the Soviet government lost track of the ball. Just as seems to be happening with you.
Theories are not to be liked or disliked, but used for explanation and prediction. Your explanations explain only your fantasy suppositions and fears---which somewhat begs the question of whether anything is being explained. The only prediction is for an immense betrayal and doom. I don't see the utility of this theory, unless it is to justify giving up and walking away. Who benefits by that? Which makes me wonder where this theory really comes from. (Sorry, but you opened Pandora's Box.)
(Full disclosure. I have limited time resources and simply could not respond to your full-length exposition. This forum is not designed for such things and we will have to put this all in the hands of God---and Wait and See.