Responding to an NPC is not futile, as there are often countless silent lurkers reading your posts. Here are some responses to common attacks to the Q movement.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 HANDY RED PILL 💊
Pike may have been any other thing, which would be no basis for thinking that other thing was a key motive for Trump. The fact is that you are bigoted about Freemasons and are jumping on Pike being a Freemason as a Nazi might jump on Pike being a Jew. Same thing.
I have dealt with and met and have friends who are Masons. No hint of turpitude or degeneracy. For those who believe where there is smoke there is fire---there is no smoke. Nor any smell.
Will symbolism be MY downfall? Do you have symbols? Are art motifs symbols? You are grasping at straws and it is pathetic.
The point is that he wasnt anything else - it was a statue celebrating his contributions to Freemasonry. Why not just go read morals and dogma?
It’s freely available for you so you can get a measure of Albert Pike.
Calling being anti Masonic bigotry? Pfft
Well, if it’s wrong to be bigoted against secretive societies run by the upper echelons of society who worship Lucifer then yes, I guess I’m a rancid bigot. Just as in the same way I’ma rancid transphobe for not wanting little kids to be butchered and drugged or a rotten racist for not wanting to exterminate white people.
Get a clue
Albert Pike was more than a Freemason. Just as George Washington was more than a Freemason. So, you are good with the destruction of all George Washington memorials? Including the Washington monument? And his face on Mount Rushmore?
Masons worship Lucifer? Sauce, much? Yeah, you Are a "rancid bigot." At least you admit it. (I'm not interested in transphobes or racists for purposes of this exchange. Cute distraction, though.)
Listen, the statue was a statue COMMEMORATING PINES FREEMASONRY.
You’re just being wilfully blind and wilfully ignorant. Your choice of course but I think it’sa stupid choice and does you no favours at all
You don't have to yell to make an irrelevant point. You, on the other hand, are blind to my points. You don't address them at all, as though by not doing so you can pretend they didn't exist. Well, too bad. Those are the objections I have and since you have no interest in countering them, I feel justified in maintaining them. It is pretty clear that when (1) you have no response, and (2) you resort to verbal abuse, you have lost the argument.
Sauce? I told you to go read morals and dogma
Oh. A reading assignment. On the basis of which no one else in the world seems to be convinced. Which you don't seem disposed to reconcile with the character of George Washington. That's a big stumbling block, you know.