Well when you make sweeping generalizations like women's favorite pass time is killing their own children, it's reasonable to assume you might draw some flak.

Why is it out of the question that some or most SIDs can be caused by a heavy vaccination load? I implore you to check out the CDC recommended vaccination schedules for 1-2 month, 3-4 month, 5-6 month olds and compare that to the average SIDs death age distribution. (19 vaccines by 6 months, 5 more by 12 months)

Here's an interesting fact, the risk of SIDs appears higher in baby boys. Did you know that autism affects far more boys than girls? As the vaccination load has increased over the years, the rate of autism has skyrockted as well. Around 1 in 30 kids have autism.

What sounds more likely: women have an deep-seeded psychopathy that should have caused the demise of the human race ages ago or the bombardment of a heavy metal, formaldehyde, fetal tissue cocktail injected into an infant's veins may be harmful for them?

You are correct, it is not jab related. It's to protect drug addicts. A different form of this bill was created after two women were criminally prosecuted because their babies were born drug addicted and died of withdraw shortly thereafter. The politicians behind it -- and the state attorney general -- said it was horrible that women were being persecuted for the death of the babies. That bill died, and was resurrected as this one. *edit to add an article about the original bill: https://californiaglobe.com/articles/infanticide-or-pregnancy-loss-abortion-bill-passes-assembly-judiciary-committee/