20-Year-Old Nursing Student Dies Suddenly of Cardiac Arrest One Day After Being Forced to Get COVID-19 Shot
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
For the sake of truth, "forced" is not correct. Unless she was physically held down against her will, she was not forced.
Do you know any Patriots who lost their jobs and in turn their homes for refusing to bow to their control tactics? I do. Some of these patriots who have become homeless over the last couple of years are probably driven by and scorned by some on this board.
This woman had her reasons, but she chose to be under their authority.
Force and coercion are very similar.
If you are told take it or lose your job, and the person knows they won't last a month without the income, they might as well have been strapped down.
A meaningless distinction.
Fact check: True
Which is why coercion, by name, is a listed CRIME in most jurisdictions (well, maybe not in modern-day California, but still . . .)
Fact check: False.
Yes, force and coercion are similar, but where coercion doesn't involve physical force or the threat thereof, then a distinction remains and it is not meaningless. Coercion (loss of job, being barred from school, etc) is powerful but as thousands of pureblood pedes can attest, you CAN refuse to bow to coercion and avoid the jab regardless of the consequences. Initiated coercion is evil but not quite at the level of physical force or violence.
Frankly, I agree. Many of us were able to cope with those things to where the coercion was a less weighted threat.
Someone living paycheck to paycheck with dependants, that may not have been anything of a choice, in those circumstances the coercion would be the same force as if they got strapped to the chair.
This
Your intellectual laziness to differentiate is a microcosm of the root of the evil in the world.
It's not intellectual laziness, I understand that there is a difference. The fact is that there are people who simply don't have enough backup to even gamble on finding a new job...
We say it’s not force in spite of that fact, not because we don’t know such obvious things. You said it’s meaningless, but it’s not. Asleep = can’t differentiate (perceive difference) between things.
It's not meaningless at all. I understand coercion and yes, this whole thing has been a shitshow powergrab and they will all hang. But to say they may as well have been strapped down is far from the truth. She took it because she was afraid of being homeless is my guess. So she gave more power to the DS by taking the shot.
If everyone quit their jobs that were threatening them instead of caving, this shit wouldn't have lasted a week. If everyone refused to wear a face diaper from the beginning, this wouldn't have lasted a week.
It's people who care more about creature comforts than their own lives who took this shit so far. She caved. Period.
Perhaps meaningless was the wrong word, I mean, for me, I could probably get by without a job for a few years. There are a shocking number of people who are paycheck to paycheck with dependants, for them, it's not even just a math of creature comforts.
Violates Nuremberg.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur
You can bet they aren’t cautioning people before they give these jabs that it could kill them.
IMHO, people are basically afraid to admit that it could actually be possible that their own gov’t would be complicit in these atrocities, so they refuse to open their eyes. It’s almost like they believe going ahead with it will prove them right.