that would be the only possible answer that makes sense. People in this thread trying to defend apollo is hilarious. So easy to understand that they were fake.
The apollo missions did not go to the moon with a 40 kilobyte computer. They did not bring a moon buggy for funsies. There was no crater when a 10,000lb thrust engine landed or took off from moon dust. A human should be able to jump over 13 ft high on the moon, the astronauts didn't exceed 12 inches. The delay when they were talking to nixon was faster than the speed of light. The 3 apollo 11 astronauts looked like they wanted to kill themselves at their press conference after the mission, and couldn't even agree whether they saw stars or not, finally agreeing that they could not see any stars in space. NASA destroyed all the telemetry data and says it no longer exists. Current astronauts (Don Pettit) are on camera saying they "destroyed the technology" and cannot go back to the moon. Others are on camera admitting they have never left low earth orbit. The van allen radiation belts would have destroyed any on-board computers (admitted in current videos by nasa saying they have to design thick radiation shields to get through them) despite the fact that the lunar lander was made up of 1/8th inch aluminum.
The Nazis won World War II and the "Cold War" was a farce.
The German scientists working for the Soviet Union weren't going to rat out the German scientists working for the United States. They collaborated on their research projects.
This is actually covered in one of the documentaries. According to one woman whose father worked at NASA, she said that above the political theater of the cold war, that russian and US technocrats were close friends. The cold war was largely a scare/fear tactic to keep people in line and prevent the outbreak of another global conflict. Above the theater, the world has been controlled by the same people on both sides.
Sure they went to the Moon with a 40 kbyte computer. Why not? They had elaborate manual procedures to make it work, however. When the X-20 program (DynaSoar) was active, the Boeing company figured out a way for the astronaut to manually pilot the vehicle all the way from orbit to a ground landing. We were able to do impressive things back in the days of slide rules.
The Moon Buggy was not for funsies. It was to get them farther from the landing site for samples and observations.
Why would there be a crater when the dust layer was thin, backed by rock, and the exhaust plume had expanded like a huge bubble? (That's what they do in vacuum: take a sharp outward turn past the exhaust cone.) That like expecting a helicopter to produce a sandstorm whenever it landed on arid ground.
13 feet on the moon would be 2+ feet on the Earth. Try that. Then try it again wearing 175 pounds of Moon Suit. With the bending of your limbs constrained by the fabric and joints. (We are working up to the realization that you don't know what you are talking about.)
The Moon is about 350,000 km from the Earth. The light speed delay is essentially 1 second. System delays would make it longer. Do you have any scientific reference that substantiates a claim that the delay was shorter?
Whether you see stars or not depends on how dark adapted you are and whether you have been gazing into the star field for some time, or glance at it from a lighted environment.
Not all the data is destroyed. Mostly what happened is that we still have the data, but it is on storage media for which we no longer have readout systems. That is a stupid oopsie, but not a deliberate plot. And what are we missing that you would be so concerned about?
We didn't "destroy" the technology to go to the Moon. We just threw it aside and let it rot, for want of continuing to go there. It takes a huge effort in time and money to make and launch an Apollo mission. We couldn't afford to keep it up. (Vietnam War and all that.) You can see it in museums. We also have lost the knowledge of how to build 16-inch naval cannon, for the same reason. Elon Musk is revving up a new approach. (Don't hold your breath for the Space Launch System. It is NASA's equivalent to building a pyramid.)
The Apollo 7 mission never left low Earth orbit because it was not meant to. It was an early test of the system.
The Van Allen belts did not destroy any computers. Not even for the lunar probe missions. Not even the electronics on Explorer I which was the satellite that detected them. Nobody was killed by the Van Allen belts. It makes a difference whether you are passing through at close to 10 km/sec or hanging out for a long time. (By the way, you shield a computer by putting it in a shielding box, not by making the entire spacecraft a shield.)
If all the other thousand pieces of evidence are as flimsy as these, you would not be able to sit on it without it collapsing.
Why did Michael Collins say he couldn't see any stars in space, clown? All while Neil armstrong looked like he wanted to blow his head off after supposedly achieving the greatest accomplishment in human history.
It's been my hypothesis that they went to the moon using Technologies that weren't supposed to exist, then you'd want to conceal that, even if it meant recreating the events on a stage.
But the video footage we saw could easily have been faked. Maybe it's just a coincidence that Stanley Kubrick was filming 2001 at about the same time and was perfecting highly realistic sets and cinematography.
If I recall, he said we've been to the moon, not specifically that the moon landings were real.
It might be that Apollo was fake but we indeed have a secret real moon program.
that would be the only possible answer that makes sense. People in this thread trying to defend apollo is hilarious. So easy to understand that they were fake.
WRONG!
u/#q2225
The apollo missions did not go to the moon with a 40 kilobyte computer. They did not bring a moon buggy for funsies. There was no crater when a 10,000lb thrust engine landed or took off from moon dust. A human should be able to jump over 13 ft high on the moon, the astronauts didn't exceed 12 inches. The delay when they were talking to nixon was faster than the speed of light. The 3 apollo 11 astronauts looked like they wanted to kill themselves at their press conference after the mission, and couldn't even agree whether they saw stars or not, finally agreeing that they could not see any stars in space. NASA destroyed all the telemetry data and says it no longer exists. Current astronauts (Don Pettit) are on camera saying they "destroyed the technology" and cannot go back to the moon. Others are on camera admitting they have never left low earth orbit. The van allen radiation belts would have destroyed any on-board computers (admitted in current videos by nasa saying they have to design thick radiation shields to get through them) despite the fact that the lunar lander was made up of 1/8th inch aluminum.
There are 1000 other pieces of evidence.
I'm good with all of these assertions. However, the question that drives me crazy is this. Why didn't the Russians rat NASA out?
The Nazis won World War II and the "Cold War" was a farce.
The German scientists working for the Soviet Union weren't going to rat out the German scientists working for the United States. They collaborated on their research projects.
Because they were bribed not too.
This is actually covered in one of the documentaries. According to one woman whose father worked at NASA, she said that above the political theater of the cold war, that russian and US technocrats were close friends. The cold war was largely a scare/fear tactic to keep people in line and prevent the outbreak of another global conflict. Above the theater, the world has been controlled by the same people on both sides.
Holy mother of God.
A space suit is 280 lbs, without the astronaut.
Thank you for playing. Enjoy your time on conspiracies.WIN
Sure they went to the Moon with a 40 kbyte computer. Why not? They had elaborate manual procedures to make it work, however. When the X-20 program (DynaSoar) was active, the Boeing company figured out a way for the astronaut to manually pilot the vehicle all the way from orbit to a ground landing. We were able to do impressive things back in the days of slide rules.
The Moon Buggy was not for funsies. It was to get them farther from the landing site for samples and observations.
Why would there be a crater when the dust layer was thin, backed by rock, and the exhaust plume had expanded like a huge bubble? (That's what they do in vacuum: take a sharp outward turn past the exhaust cone.) That like expecting a helicopter to produce a sandstorm whenever it landed on arid ground.
13 feet on the moon would be 2+ feet on the Earth. Try that. Then try it again wearing 175 pounds of Moon Suit. With the bending of your limbs constrained by the fabric and joints. (We are working up to the realization that you don't know what you are talking about.)
The Moon is about 350,000 km from the Earth. The light speed delay is essentially 1 second. System delays would make it longer. Do you have any scientific reference that substantiates a claim that the delay was shorter?
Whether you see stars or not depends on how dark adapted you are and whether you have been gazing into the star field for some time, or glance at it from a lighted environment.
Not all the data is destroyed. Mostly what happened is that we still have the data, but it is on storage media for which we no longer have readout systems. That is a stupid oopsie, but not a deliberate plot. And what are we missing that you would be so concerned about?
We didn't "destroy" the technology to go to the Moon. We just threw it aside and let it rot, for want of continuing to go there. It takes a huge effort in time and money to make and launch an Apollo mission. We couldn't afford to keep it up. (Vietnam War and all that.) You can see it in museums. We also have lost the knowledge of how to build 16-inch naval cannon, for the same reason. Elon Musk is revving up a new approach. (Don't hold your breath for the Space Launch System. It is NASA's equivalent to building a pyramid.)
The Apollo 7 mission never left low Earth orbit because it was not meant to. It was an early test of the system.
The Van Allen belts did not destroy any computers. Not even for the lunar probe missions. Not even the electronics on Explorer I which was the satellite that detected them. Nobody was killed by the Van Allen belts. It makes a difference whether you are passing through at close to 10 km/sec or hanging out for a long time. (By the way, you shield a computer by putting it in a shielding box, not by making the entire spacecraft a shield.)
If all the other thousand pieces of evidence are as flimsy as these, you would not be able to sit on it without it collapsing.
Why did Michael Collins say he couldn't see any stars in space, clown? All while Neil armstrong looked like he wanted to blow his head off after supposedly achieving the greatest accomplishment in human history.
Is this ScIeNCE...?
Cause it look like science, but it doesn't fit with my conformation bias, so it can't be true.
My friend down the street was over the room of computers at Huntsville. He is a brain. We went to the moon.
It's been my hypothesis that they went to the moon using Technologies that weren't supposed to exist, then you'd want to conceal that, even if it meant recreating the events on a stage.
This is the answer right here.
"Moon landings are real."
But the video footage we saw could easily have been faked. Maybe it's just a coincidence that Stanley Kubrick was filming 2001 at about the same time and was perfecting highly realistic sets and cinematography.