A simple explanation of how "The Scientific Method" has changed from Then to Now....
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 TRUTH PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Please show me a virus being and kept physically isolated from all other material of a sample from a sick person and then put it in a volunteer to show it definitely is what caused the sickness.
It would be unethical to perform such an experiment on people. You'd have to have a compelling reason to do so. The bar would be pretty high to get such research approved.
Clearly your opinion on ethics is vastly different than that of the entire medical industry.
But regardless, I'm going to continue demanding proof that this thing that has never even been isolated in order to be identified is what is causing a certain kind of sickness.
They exist. I have isolated them and worked with them myself. We keep vials of them in the freezer.
Nonsense. Your vials contain decomposed green monkey kidney particles and other bio-particulates from the FBS or vero cell substitute.
Nobody in the history of science has ever "ISOLATED" a virus, assuming we agree to the standard definition of the word "isolate" - which virologists have deceptively changed to perform their black magic.
Until somebody can actually FIND/SEE/LOCATE a "virus" DIRECTLY in the fluids/tissue of a diseased specimen, there will never be any such feat known as "virus isolation". Because there's no such thing.
You've been fooled AspenHome. And I do realize that's easier to fool you than to convince you that you've (as well as all your colleagues and anybody who truly BELIEVES they work with viruses) been fooled.
I have examined the process virologists use to "isolate" them. What is your process?
They've tried for decades, including trying to infect orphans with polio as recently as the 1950s in "cosmopolitan" New York City.
They gave up right after the great deception known as Ender's "Viral Culturing" knowing they could perform their black magic undetected giving them license to claim a new moral high-ground they previously could have cared less about.
There's no proof of anything known as a virus. It's all lies and it's easy to demonstrate. You can read EVERY SINGLE paper in the "official" published literature and prove the ongoing fraud underway.
And BTW, virologists haven't run any control experiments since Jon Enders in 1954. But hey, trust the {NON}-science, right?
I'd be happy to explain to you how you have no "professional experience" with any viruses if you're interested in learning. Granted, I realize that you certainly BELIEVE you've worked with viruses, as do your professors/co-workers/colleagues, etc. There's a big difference.