A simple explanation of how "The Scientific Method" has changed from Then to Now....
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 TRUTH PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Science has really taken a turn for the worst on many levels. One of the most enraging things is that every person thinks themselves qualified to talk on what is or isn’t scientifically proven. They think because they’ve read the conclusions of papers or simply watched science YouTube videos that they can go around and tell others what is ‘scientifically proven’. It’s an absurd level of arrogance. I was always top of the class in all of school and University (aeronautical engineering) and yet I have people who have never done any science telling me about their opinion on viruses, genes, cancer and so on, and backing it up with it’s scientifically proven’. I don’t bother to say: ‘When exactly did you gain any ability to discern what is or isn’t scientifically proven? What skills are you calling on to help you make your assessment?’ I usually don’t want to prove anything specific to them, but do want them to understand that they don’t actually ‘know’ the things they think they know. The satanic propaganda machine has empowered the world’s dumbest people to believe they know pretty much everything. People will tell me ‘this disorder is genetic’. I’ll say, ‘which gene?’ Well, they don’t know which gene, but they can assure me that it’s all in the papers, I just have to look and I’ll know they’re right. As I understand, all gene theory is coming up bunk, just like virus theory, just like cancer theory. All these theories are turning out to be substitutes for a lack of conscious awareness of one’s own body/mind/spirit complex. Oh, but count the hundreds of millions, if not billions, who will step right up without hesitation to explain to me that these theories are certainly correct. Lucky there’s a great awakening happening.
Whole heartedly agree except there definitely are genes that program your bodily makeup as they do all living things and there definitely are viruses. I have personal professional experience with both.
Please show me a virus being and kept physically isolated from all other material of a sample from a sick person and then put it in a volunteer to show it definitely is what caused the sickness.
It would be unethical to perform such an experiment on people. You'd have to have a compelling reason to do so. The bar would be pretty high to get such research approved.
Clearly your opinion on ethics is vastly different than that of the entire medical industry.
But regardless, I'm going to continue demanding proof that this thing that has never even been isolated in order to be identified is what is causing a certain kind of sickness.
They've tried for decades, including trying to infect orphans with polio as recently as the 1950s in "cosmopolitan" New York City.
They gave up right after the great deception known as Ender's "Viral Culturing" knowing they could perform their black magic undetected giving them license to claim a new moral high-ground they previously could have cared less about.
There's no proof of anything known as a virus. It's all lies and it's easy to demonstrate. You can read EVERY SINGLE paper in the "official" published literature and prove the ongoing fraud underway.
And BTW, virologists haven't run any control experiments since Jon Enders in 1954. But hey, trust the {NON}-science, right?
I'd be happy to explain to you how you have no "professional experience" with any viruses if you're interested in learning. Granted, I realize that you certainly BELIEVE you've worked with viruses, as do your professors/co-workers/colleagues, etc. There's a big difference.