I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
Think about the sun. You can observe that:
The sun appears circular.
The sun appears to maintain its shape as it moves across the sky.
The sun appears to maintain its size as it moves across the sky.
The sun appears to rise from and set beneath ground level.
These phenomena are true no matter your longitude.
Different longitudes observe different times of day simultaneously.
Certain latitudes (above the arctic circle) may not see the sun rise and set every day, though it does move.
All of these facts are verifiable either by yourself, or by talking to trusted people living around the world (and in Alaska).
I have yet to find or be told a flat earth theory that is able to explain all of these factual observations at the same time.
None of your points support that the sun is a SPHERE (a ball), nor that the earth is rotating. In fact, if you carefully read back your own points you will see that this is so.
Evaluate your own points in relation to a MOVING LIGHT (sun) and a STATIONARY PLANE (earth). They all work perfectly.
If the sun were a light moving across a planar earth, it would appear to get smaller as it moves farther away from directly overhead. This is not observed. Try again.
Sometimes it does appear smaller, sometimes it appears larger. Atmospheric lensing causes these phenomena.
If it weren't a "ball of hydrogen gas" 93 million miles away (fraudulent calculation) but rather a projected, reflected light more along the order of 3000 miles away, you've got to rethink the entire basis of your argument.
You're trapped in lies if you wish to cling to nonexistent gravity, floating rocks in the sky, burning balls of gas that don't dissipate into a vacuum, etc.
See how one lie leads to another, to another, to another until you're lost in a fabricated model?
Find out how they supposedly calculated the size and distance of the sun. Was it based on one or more ASSUMPTIONS? If it was, how many more ASSUMPTIONS do you think can be built on the first?
The round earth model is self-consistent. Every question you ask about it, every confusion you have with it, every observation you make with your own eyes, can be answered within the framework of this theory. (And I can do just that, if you want. You may not be satisfied with the answers though.)
The same cannot be said about flat earth.
For example, here you introduce the idea that light does not travel in an approximately straight line from its source. “atmospheric lensing”, you say. In other words, “you can’t trust your own eyes.” Am I hearing this correctly? Anyways… Why does “atmospheric lensing” not apply to objects we send high into the air, but it happens to only affect light from celestial objects in such a way that it perfectly imitates the round earth model?
Give me some equations for your theory. Let’s make some measurable predictions. Unless you’re too scared that the truth will upset your worldview?
Totally agree about the sun. The moon has me a little perplexed though. It lights up like a flashlight. And sometimes earths shadow is curved impossibly. Also just how sometimes half the moon is completely missing when you should at least see an outline. And why doesn’t the sun pull it into its gravitational pull. It’s always bothered me. Also how the sun and moon are basically the same size as you look at it.
Here’s another thing to think about: the tides. The tides sync up perfectly with the moon’s periodic motion, and do not increase or decrease in intensity with the phase of the moon.
I’m gonna assume you already accept that the same thing pulling us to the ground also governs the motion of the sun and moon. Because we have equations for that. The easiest one to apply would be Newton’s law of gravitation, which is accurate in all but the edge cases (stuff that gets really close to the sun). If you look at the equation, you can see that the force of gravity depends on two things: mass and distance, and these factors act opposite to each other. So, thinking about the gravity of two objects, even if one is much less massive than the other, if you get close enough to the smaller object (and far enough away from the larger one), the smaller object’s gravity dominates. So that’s one explanation why the moon (an object) stays linked to the earth (an object), as opposed to the sun (an object). Look into “Lagrange points” for some interesting extra info resulting from this sort of system.
I don’t know enough to talk about the optical properties of the moon, but remember that (according to the commonly accepted theory) the phases are the moon’s shadow, lunar eclipses are the earth’s shadow.
Scientists consider the relative size of the sun and moon in the sky to be a coincidence. God probably made it that way for good reason.
>>> I’m gonna assume you already accept that the same thing pulling us to the ground also governs the motion of the sun and moon.
You give flerfs too much credit.
I can send you a 4th grade science book if you like.
LOL. Truth. My 4th grade teacher was a genius as it pertains to the solar system. Why don't more idiots follow the simple teachings from their public school? Don't tell me they are just teaching what their told to teach. That's more lies!