I saw it multiple times, I believe you guys too. The term “shapeshifters” or “reptilians” or “flat earth” that we saw in various posts here and on other sites.
I will show you how it’s used by the bad guys to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label and slow down awakening.
Example:
”Billy Corgan: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”
https://newspunch.com/billy-corgan-shapeshifting-reptilians/
My reaction to it is:
Add “flat earth” to it and you can easily label all inconvenient truth as “conspiracy theory”.
As simple as that.
They could have done it better this way: ‘Shapeshifting Reptilians’ who live on the opposite side of the Flat Earth Run The ‘Satanic’ Music Industry”.
Recall Pelosi saying on video:
We smear somebody with falsehood and all the rest, then you (journalists) print it and we say: The Press has published that (…) - it legitimises what we said, .. etc.
Talking about “shapeshifters” and “reptilians” is a similar tactic but it’s used to strengthen “conspiracy theorist” label.
When do they need to strengthen the “conspiracy theorist” label?
-
when the label stops working,
-
when people discover that all previous conspiracy theories came out to be a reality,
-
when we’re winning awakening the masses.
The deep state has to stick some bullshit they can call later so that people won’t believe it, otherwise the “conspiracy theorist” label will stop working at all.
Think about it as a slider that reflects the % of the truth within the “conspiracy theory” space.
-
We prove something was real, we move the slider closer to 100%
-
We say that the difference between the conspiracy theory and the reality was 2 years, 6 months and now it’s 2 months.
-
We’re destroying the term (a weapon) the C_A has created to prevent awakening.
-
They want to move the slider back where it was, closer to 0% so the term (a weapon) can be used again.
It’s NOT about the flat earth or reptilians.
It’s about Awakening.
Everyone who pushes these theories is either unaware or is a shill working for the deep state for money. People who try to justify “we use it to label (them)” are also either unaware or are paid shills who word Kadr to prevent awakening.
When we hear someone like this article and person “witnessing” it (especially famous person) - we have to note it as he isn’t on our side and will betray us. These celebrities are bought to make a contrast between:
- their lies and fake reality they want us to live and believe in,
versus:
- the truth about their pedo perversions, rapes, blackmail and satanic sacrifice.
Once they add something crazy and unreal to the second group - people are more likely to sit in the first box. Be aware of that!
Even if you’re crazy enough to believe that reptilians are real - it’s your choice. But if you really support the Great Awakening - you need to be aware that normies won’t move from the box 1 to box 2 if you add too much for them to accept. Knowing that: avoid flat earth and reptilians terminology here, leave it for yourself for later, if you enjoy it and focus on Great Awakening.
It’s a social engineering, consciously used by the Deep State.
At this stage anyone pushing flat earth and reptilians theories slows down the awakening process, no matter if consciously and intentionally or not.
I’ve made this post quite long and intentionally used the keywords in the title. Some shills will jump in and start calling me names without even reading the whole post. Once you’ve read the whole thing up until here - you understand who can sponsor to push these theories. Let them to reveal themselves, check their posts and their other comments, give your vote to the article and comments. Digital battlefield.
There are? There's $60K out there waiting to be claimed if you can come up JUST ONE... you don't need any of the other "too many ways".
Those aren't legitimate offers, the capacity of flat earthers to shift goal posts is on par with leftists.
I've gone through those debates with flat earthers, there's a reason why I call it a fundamental misunderstanding of scientific principles.
Which "scientific principle" are we misunderstanding? Einstenian gravity (fraud)? Special relativity (fraud)? General relativity (fraud)? Quantum mechanics (fraud)? Quantum superposition (fraud)? Newtonian gravity (fraud)? Dark matter and dark energy (frauds to uphold the gravity fraud)?
I've educated myself carefully on all of the above as well as the heliosexual MODEL (mental abstraction) for over 5 years.
I'd love to know which "scientific principle" we misunderstand. Are you sure you understand it/them?
As to the $60K, the offer is 100% legitimate. I'm friends with the guy who is offering it and I can guarantee he'll honor the bet.
I think you're afraid to discover you've been duped and your comment is a cognitive dissonance reaction. If you're afraid to claim your prize, give me your irrefutable scientific proof and I'll submit it and we can split the 3 bitcoin.
I'm the first guy in line totally prepared to change my mind at a moment's notice. If you've got an irrefutable proof, I'll return to the heliosexual side of the fence in a heartbeat.
I'm happy to debate you and show you how you don't have any science backing your MODEL, but rather scientism. I spent the first 3 years of my research looking for this proof because, believe it or not, I thought FE was a nutso conspiracy theory too. I didn't set out to join with what I thought were the whackjobs, my goal was to shut them down. Boy was I humbled.
Let's do it via DM. Show me your proof. If I can debunk it and it's scientifically sound, I'll submit it and we split the winnings with you. Sound like a plan?
Noteworthy is that, while I agree ib the sense that each of those is inadequate, for the most part, there's a foundation based on observation. Then you get the theorists who develop these mathematical models that diverge away from the foundation of what can be objectively measured.
Anyway, the most common areas where a principle is used but the effects at a planetary scale are not applied. First, is that liquids volume cannot be compressed, an effect that is neglible in a small scale. Next, how light bends in a fluid. There are others, for example, some extended family came to visit Canada from Texas, where they were commenting on how the sunset was several hours beyond what they were used to at that time of year.
Or, how the north star (polaris) is the only one that remains motionless and if a camera is left focused on that star can see the rest of the sky rotating around that.
These are ground observable factors that fit right in with a spherical planet that requires some very creative work to validate with a flat earth model.
No doubt the offer is sincere, the intent to pay out is not. The whole reason to put out that kind of offer is to say that "we put a reward and nobody came to claim it."
Observation is not a "Scientific Principle"
What relevance does this have to scientifically demonstrating the globe?
I'm still waiting on the "scientific principle".
More "Observations" that have a perfectly rational explanation on a motionless, non-rotating plane.
None I've heard that don't work equally as well on a motionless, non-rotating plane. But you're still dilly-dallying with "observations" and avoiding the scientific principles.
I personally vouch for the guy. And oh, BTW, there's a physics professor trying right this very minute to win the bitcoin. He's already been given a chance and he's trying again today. It's sincere. But he's gonna need a "scientific principle" to upend the FE research, not an "observation" that can be explained in more ways than one.
I’ll bite. Take a look at my first comment on another branch of this reply tree, the one with seven observations about the sun.
And give me a consistent flat earth model that explains all that. With distances and equations and assumptions.
Also,
I hope you don’t mind me referring to the “flat brain” model if we’re doing this sort of thing.
I just think "Heliosexual" is a funny play on words living in today's world of maddness, no ill-intent intended. You can reference the open-minded vanguard any way you like. I'm not offended.
I responded directly to your 7 points. You are very common amongst the stunted-glober brethren. Despite mountains of scientific evidence disproving the globe, you aren't going to budge into you have a perfect MODEL (aka, "mental abstraction") to replace your fantasy MODEL. We see it all the time. Despite us demonstrating your model is broken in numerous places, none of it makes a difference because there isn't a 5-minute video that feeds you your replacement model. In fact, I don't think that would work either. Nothing will. This is some powerful brainwashing the Jesuits have indoctrinated the masses with since kindergarten.
But let's take a stab at your 7 points just for fun:
Agreed. All light sources appear circular.
Disagreed. The sun regularly changes optical sizes due to a whole host of factors. We do agree that the sun is ACUTALLY "one size" however. Nothing about this demands you must be on a globe or on a rotating ball.
As does anything else in the distance. On a flat road with evenly spaced telephone poles this is exactly what you see. Staring down a long hotel corridor you see the same. The sky(roof), ground(floor) and if indoors walls all eventually collapse into a single point. This is human optics 101. There's nothing unique about what you see in regards to the sun. The horizon always collapses at 3-6 miles (atmospheric conditions dependent).
And why does this matter? How would this be impossible on a non-moving, non-rotating plane? And be careful not to ASSUME your burning-ball of hydrogen gas is 93 million miles away. How would your perspective change if instead the sun was approximately 3300 miles away?
So what. Why is this significant in your mind?
Perfectly explainable on a non-moving, non-rotating plane. But this should also be the case in the so-called antarctic circle as well. And yet, there are no videos capturing this phenomenon. There are two OBVIOUS AND DELIBERATE fraudulent videos however that have been roundly and soundly debunked. Why do you suppose someone would make these fake videos anyway?
As I shared elsewhere in this post, we can fight over observations until the cows come home. You can dig in and BELIEVE that your observations can't possibly be explained on anything but a globe while I say they can be explained on both a globe and a non-moving, non-rotating plane. And nobody will budge because that's what humans do.
Or, we could produce VERIFIABLE, REPEATABLE scientific experiments that you, me or anybody else that cares to see for themselves could do - eliminating all NASA/University SCIENTISM which is infested with ASSUMPTIONS. It's the only way forward.
Turns out, there are hundreds of people all around the world doing these scientific experiments themselves all the time. And strangely, they keep disproving the globe. How could that be? Here's a brief 13-minute video demonstrating a mere dozen of these experiments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQoz9aiNRzU&t=608s
You can't explain all this away. It's so tiring. Hundreds if not thousands of videos like these have been produced for over 10 years now. There are only two possible explanations:
All these random people who stand to gain nothing from you are liars and deceivers just because they get a kick out of tricking their brothers.
NASA, the Jesuits and Free masons are liars and deceivers because they stand to gain a great deal from you, namely your unquestioning COMPLIANCE & OBEDIENCE to their artificial matrix of dog-eat-dog commercial warfare.
It's one or the other. Either there are hundreds of lowly peons that get their rocks off producing fake videos and tricking their fellow man or the all-powerful rulers have a vested interest in keeping you deaf, dumb and blind to your reality.
And you can even do one better and go out there and do the scientific experiment yourself if you find both explanations unsettling.
What do you think?