I’m saying he could be, or could not be. But I’m inclined to note the Q postings about him.. What proof do you have that he isn’t? Some wack ass post by Jen socky?
Unless there is evidence (and "evidence" is NOT suspicion or distrust), there is nothing to discuss. Accusation of someone being a Mossad agent is merely a convenient cloak for anti-Semitism.
It hardly "disproves" the Mossad connection. Even 'Q' makes the point that AJ is a Mossad asset. The judgement against AJ has much wider implications to any voice out there that disagrees with the government narrative or spreads "misinformation". Who gets to decide what 'misinformation' is, especially when the government gets caught lying to us over and over again? It gives a monopoly to the government and its corporate sponsors. AJ has possibly set the precedent, and destroyed independent journalism. Free Speech is no longer 'free', except for the government approved Fake media. His mission is perhaps completed.
The script hasn't even played out yet and your dooming. To remind you, GAW is a pro-'Q' forum.
And yes, there's a preponderance of evidence showing AJ is indeed a Mos proxy. I've followed AJ early on after William Cooper was murdered. I'm aware of Cooper's warning about AJ. I've watched AJ fold on previous lawsuits like the one Chobani lawsuit, to which AJ was absolutely correct, yet he still folded. Others as well. Why? Then the Sandy Hook lawsuits. The repeated same pattern paints a picture. His sponsors and network owners, along with his affiliation with a known Mos private Intelligence company, and other known Mos connections confirm it. Even his former wife is Yewish.
Anyone claiming they understand the 'Q' COMMS, other than standing united (ergo, WWG1WGA) and patriotic themes are charlatans. Q COMMs are an enigma to me. The COMMS are not meant for us, but are for other people in the know. We happen to be the field of battle where the COMMS are taking place in plain sight.
You used the word 'shill'. I never did. My personal policy is to never name call or use ad hominems. I never down-vote people either because it doesn't inspire debate, but acts as a stiletto. To me, its a useless and destructive function. Either up-vote a comment or not at all.
I suppose no one can 'prove' to you that AJ is a tool for Zionism, but he will never cross that line. I use to follow AJ for about 20 years now.It has been confirmed Adnan Khashoggi, who owns Genesis Communications Network is a Mossad Agent. Even Veteran's Today talks about AJ's growing complication of Israeli Connections. In other words-- Ya just can'r make this shit up.
Downvotes make sense when shills or pure doomhating get identified. Better to keep that stuff at the bottom, and signal to mods. Not a big deal, but sometimes worthwhile.
I've never used the down-vote simply because I don't believe in it. if I can't persuade someone in their discourse of thought, then I simply agree to disagree and move on. If someone comments with a prescient and interesting bit of information, I will up-vote. If someone posts something that is an outlier to the general discourse here. I simply move on. Lastly, I never name call or use ad hominems even after I am called names. To me, it only sours the discussion. I want to know what people think and why.
The question becomes-- Who determines who is a shill? You? Me? An on-line gang? The down-votes tend to be used for avoiding debate simply because someone disapproves what is being said. GAW is most definitely not a place intended for 'group think', gang-like behavior, or an echo chamber. I believe it is best left to the moderators to make this determination. Another consequence is the down-votes make it possible for certain alliances to attack a 'marked' individual. These alliances may even be pre-conceived by outside nefarious entities (ergo, paid infiltration groups). There's plenty of examples of forums being destroyed by these tactics.
You and other enlightened people post here with other rational lurkers wanting to learn. I certainly do. Each one of us are indeed-- 'We are the news'. That 'news' each of us brings through astute perspective and are incredibly valuable to me. I may not always agree, but certainly that person has the right to express it.
I think of it more as a defense against alliance-upvoting, and occasional mod-signalling. But I almost never use it anyway, and generally agree with you.
"Trust" doesn't necessarily mean to be assured of goodness; it can also mean to be assured of badness/doing the wrong thing.
Also, as this is a Q site, the general idea is that Q is more than a psyop and that most of what they say is true. Hence, when Q relates AJ to Mossad, the concensus is that he IS a Mossad asset until proven otherwise. https://qalerts.app/?q=+AJ+
Believe what you want, but it should be no surprise that Q and what's in the Q posts are supported on a Q site.
What if his job was to be built up revealing truth only to fall flat on his face and deter the masses from searching for the truth he spoke because he was made to look like such an idiot and anyone who listened to a single word he said is just as crazy as he is? Sounds pretty simple to me
The one thing that people never talk about is that Alex Jones never showed up to court to actually argue the Sandy Hook case thereby automatically getting ruled against
AJ is controlled opposition for normies. Think about what the average person watches: CNN, Fox, MSN….. then you have “QAnon” and InfoWars. So the average person watches carefully controlled center/left normie programming, and then there’s crazy AJ. And of course, crazy AJ covers “crazy right wing conspiracy theories” and ends up saying he’s retarded, then loses in court. A good psy op fails and makes the followers look like idiots. Just because InfoWars slightly hints at the cabal doesn’t mean it won’t talk about stuff that Q does.
THE NORMIE is carefully and methodically given the option of MSM center/left bullshit and crazy controlled Op AJ. He was a water filter and coffee salesman. His job title for the Comms Aware is quite literally to “filter information.”
^^^^Jen Psaki, and EVERY SINGLE LEFT WING person who has ever lived would agree that AJ is bad. Nothing was ever different.
Yeah no. All it does is serves their agenda of trying to keep the ruse going. It’s no coincidence all these mass attacks happened right after Obama modernized the Smith Mundt act in May of 2012. Allowing for propaganda once again to be used against the American public. The best slaves are the ones that think they’re free.
Dems cried and whined about W winning 2000 election even though his dad was obvious and known clown from long ago. I dont see how the tweet exonerates Jones at all. I dont like him cause he is a shady shill pied piper giving people 80% truth and 20% disinfo and eventually lead you off a cliff. good luck in your endeavor
https://youtu.be/z3os_Vw1Eoo
No. It does not “singlehandedly” disprove anything. Jones being involved with Mossad is still on the table.
I’m saying he could be, or could not be. But I’m inclined to note the Q postings about him.. What proof do you have that he isn’t? Some wack ass post by Jen socky?
Exactly my point, it’s up for discussion, I could be a Mossad agent for all I know, but you still didn’t prove it wrong with this tweet, sorry my guy
Unless there is evidence (and "evidence" is NOT suspicion or distrust), there is nothing to discuss. Accusation of someone being a Mossad agent is merely a convenient cloak for anti-Semitism.
If there’s nothing to discuss then why are you talking? Just dropped by to call people anti semites? Get the fuck out of here with that.
Just clarifying the grounds of discussion. By the way, I didn't accuse anyone in particular of being an anti-Semite. Did I touch a nerve?
They’re just wasting their time, shit must suck to be a shill
It hardly "disproves" the Mossad connection. Even 'Q' makes the point that AJ is a Mossad asset. The judgement against AJ has much wider implications to any voice out there that disagrees with the government narrative or spreads "misinformation". Who gets to decide what 'misinformation' is, especially when the government gets caught lying to us over and over again? It gives a monopoly to the government and its corporate sponsors. AJ has possibly set the precedent, and destroyed independent journalism. Free Speech is no longer 'free', except for the government approved Fake media. His mission is perhaps completed.
The script hasn't even played out yet and your dooming. To remind you, GAW is a pro-'Q' forum.
And yes, there's a preponderance of evidence showing AJ is indeed a Mos proxy. I've followed AJ early on after William Cooper was murdered. I'm aware of Cooper's warning about AJ. I've watched AJ fold on previous lawsuits like the one Chobani lawsuit, to which AJ was absolutely correct, yet he still folded. Others as well. Why? Then the Sandy Hook lawsuits. The repeated same pattern paints a picture. His sponsors and network owners, along with his affiliation with a known Mos private Intelligence company, and other known Mos connections confirm it. Even his former wife is Yewish.
Anyone claiming they understand the 'Q' COMMS, other than standing united (ergo, WWG1WGA) and patriotic themes are charlatans. Q COMMs are an enigma to me. The COMMS are not meant for us, but are for other people in the know. We happen to be the field of battle where the COMMS are taking place in plain sight.
You used the word 'shill'. I never did. My personal policy is to never name call or use ad hominems. I never down-vote people either because it doesn't inspire debate, but acts as a stiletto. To me, its a useless and destructive function. Either up-vote a comment or not at all.
I suppose no one can 'prove' to you that AJ is a tool for Zionism, but he will never cross that line. I use to follow AJ for about 20 years now.It has been confirmed Adnan Khashoggi, who owns Genesis Communications Network is a Mossad Agent. Even Veteran's Today talks about AJ's growing complication of Israeli Connections. In other words-- Ya just can'r make this shit up.
Downvotes make sense when shills or pure doomhating get identified. Better to keep that stuff at the bottom, and signal to mods. Not a big deal, but sometimes worthwhile.
I've never used the down-vote simply because I don't believe in it. if I can't persuade someone in their discourse of thought, then I simply agree to disagree and move on. If someone comments with a prescient and interesting bit of information, I will up-vote. If someone posts something that is an outlier to the general discourse here. I simply move on. Lastly, I never name call or use ad hominems even after I am called names. To me, it only sours the discussion. I want to know what people think and why.
The question becomes-- Who determines who is a shill? You? Me? An on-line gang? The down-votes tend to be used for avoiding debate simply because someone disapproves what is being said. GAW is most definitely not a place intended for 'group think', gang-like behavior, or an echo chamber. I believe it is best left to the moderators to make this determination. Another consequence is the down-votes make it possible for certain alliances to attack a 'marked' individual. These alliances may even be pre-conceived by outside nefarious entities (ergo, paid infiltration groups). There's plenty of examples of forums being destroyed by these tactics.
You and other enlightened people post here with other rational lurkers wanting to learn. I certainly do. Each one of us are indeed-- 'We are the news'. That 'news' each of us brings through astute perspective and are incredibly valuable to me. I may not always agree, but certainly that person has the right to express it.
I think of it more as a defense against alliance-upvoting, and occasional mod-signalling. But I almost never use it anyway, and generally agree with you.
"Trust" doesn't necessarily mean to be assured of goodness; it can also mean to be assured of badness/doing the wrong thing.
Also, as this is a Q site, the general idea is that Q is more than a psyop and that most of what they say is true. Hence, when Q relates AJ to Mossad, the concensus is that he IS a Mossad asset until proven otherwise. https://qalerts.app/?q=+AJ+
Believe what you want, but it should be no surprise that Q and what's in the Q posts are supported on a Q site.
Klaus Schwab says the same thing. One is the Light, the other is darkness.
If they have nothing to hide: DECLAS!
Oh wait, they have things to hide. Riiiiiiight. 😵
Except Q called out Alex Jones early on
https://qalerts.app/?n=2102
What if his job was to be built up revealing truth only to fall flat on his face and deter the masses from searching for the truth he spoke because he was made to look like such an idiot and anyone who listened to a single word he said is just as crazy as he is? Sounds pretty simple to me
Exactly.
The one thing that people never talk about is that Alex Jones never showed up to court to actually argue the Sandy Hook case thereby automatically getting ruled against
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/24/1088548953/alex-jones-sandy-hook-deposition-lawsuit
He only showed up for the sentencing hearing. Almost like he wanted to lose on purpose...
He's actually being sued in Connecticut too. However he decided not to put up a defense:
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2022-10-05/alex-jones-declines-to-put-on-a-defense-in-defamation-trial
Mossad or not mossad isn’t the issue. It’s the kangaroo court precedent. And the lawfare to go after alternative media.
^ this needs more upvotes
AJ is controlled opposition for normies. Think about what the average person watches: CNN, Fox, MSN….. then you have “QAnon” and InfoWars. So the average person watches carefully controlled center/left normie programming, and then there’s crazy AJ. And of course, crazy AJ covers “crazy right wing conspiracy theories” and ends up saying he’s retarded, then loses in court. A good psy op fails and makes the followers look like idiots. Just because InfoWars slightly hints at the cabal doesn’t mean it won’t talk about stuff that Q does.
THE NORMIE is carefully and methodically given the option of MSM center/left bullshit and crazy controlled Op AJ. He was a water filter and coffee salesman. His job title for the Comms Aware is quite literally to “filter information.”
^^^^Jen Psaki, and EVERY SINGLE LEFT WING person who has ever lived would agree that AJ is bad. Nothing was ever different.
This comment single handedly proves he is Mossad then
Exactly.
Question: "What is controlled opposition?"
Fake homo-op production court case...just like shittenhouse.
Yeah no. All it does is serves their agenda of trying to keep the ruse going. It’s no coincidence all these mass attacks happened right after Obama modernized the Smith Mundt act in May of 2012. Allowing for propaganda once again to be used against the American public. The best slaves are the ones that think they’re free.
Water=info...he's a water filter salesman...connect the dots
Dems cried and whined about W winning 2000 election even though his dad was obvious and known clown from long ago. I dont see how the tweet exonerates Jones at all. I dont like him cause he is a shady shill pied piper giving people 80% truth and 20% disinfo and eventually lead you off a cliff. good luck in your endeavor https://youtu.be/z3os_Vw1Eoo
LOL
If they're all about playing one against another, two sides of the same coin etc., it really does NOT prove he's not Mossad.