Nothing to do with showing "proof" but rather to do with securing legal counsel, and materiality of the indictment to the hearing on the TRO.
From their motion to hold in abeyance:
Come now Defendants True the Vote, Catherine Engelbrecht, and Gregg Phillips, by counsel, and respectfully moves this Court to hold this matter in abeyance for one week until October 19, 2022 for the following reasons.
Plaintiff yesterday moved this Court for leave to Amend its Complaint by adding a
specified individual as a named defendant (Doc 28);
Defendant Gregg Phillips has today engaged counsel to represent him in this matter;
and
Plaintiff’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Eugene Yu, will be arraigned on
Friday October 14th before the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, on felony charges sounding in theft of personal identifying information of American election workers – at which time Defendants are reliably informed, the indictment against Mr. Yu will be unsealed.
Excerpts from the argument section:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint materially alters this controversy, creating new issues requiring Defendants’ review and evaluation in order to enable this Court fully to be apprised and informed preparatory to the eventual resolution of the case. Defendant Phillips’ newly engaged counsel, John C. Kiyonaga of Alexandria, Virginia, will require at least a week adequately to apprise himself of this case so as to enable his effective representation of his client.
The unsealing of Mr. Yu’s indictment will enable this Court more effectively to assess the credibility of the only evidence supporting Plaintiff ‘s essential contentions in this action - Mr. Yu’s affidavit unenhanced through live testimony and untested through cross examination. Further illuminating as it shall, the lack of reliability of Mr. Yu’s affidavit, the unsealing of the indictment will bear with particularity on the inappropriateness of the Temporary Restraining
Order’s (“TRO”) mandate for specific performance (i.e., disclosure by Defendants of specified information). Courts are extremely reluctant to grant injunctive relief mandating specific performance.
Thank you for elucidating what EXACTLY that judge did in the Phillips case...basically, waiting for the NUKE to go off in the LA Court Room!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂
DEF: When a motion is held in abeyance, it means that the court has made a decision to put the proceeding on hold for a specific amount of time, or until something specific occurs.
Now, what is going to occur on or before 19 October 2022!!! I don't think it is GME but I do think it could be when PDJT goes before the "fake" committee and blows it up!!!! JMHO!!! 😎😎😎😎😎😎
Iirc that lines up with a GME date fag on Cohen's shares.
But so much going on now it's not surprising that things could land on the same date. Shit happening constantly.
Nothing to do with showing "proof" but rather to do with securing legal counsel, and materiality of the indictment to the hearing on the TRO.
From their motion to hold in abeyance:
Come now Defendants True the Vote, Catherine Engelbrecht, and Gregg Phillips, by counsel, and respectfully moves this Court to hold this matter in abeyance for one week until October 19, 2022 for the following reasons.
Excerpts from the argument section:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint materially alters this controversy, creating new issues requiring Defendants’ review and evaluation in order to enable this Court fully to be apprised and informed preparatory to the eventual resolution of the case. Defendant Phillips’ newly engaged counsel, John C. Kiyonaga of Alexandria, Virginia, will require at least a week adequately to apprise himself of this case so as to enable his effective representation of his client.
The unsealing of Mr. Yu’s indictment will enable this Court more effectively to assess the credibility of the only evidence supporting Plaintiff ‘s essential contentions in this action - Mr. Yu’s affidavit unenhanced through live testimony and untested through cross examination. Further illuminating as it shall, the lack of reliability of Mr. Yu’s affidavit, the unsealing of the indictment will bear with particularity on the inappropriateness of the Temporary Restraining Order’s (“TRO”) mandate for specific performance (i.e., disclosure by Defendants of specified information). Courts are extremely reluctant to grant injunctive relief mandating specific performance.
"The unsealing of Mr. Yu's indictment..."
Literally and figuratively...
https://youtu.be/YWyCCJ6B2WE?t=13 (timestamp)
Thank you for elucidating what EXACTLY that judge did in the Phillips case...basically, waiting for the NUKE to go off in the LA Court Room!!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂
NOT a law-fag so I looked up abeyance:
DEF: When a motion is held in abeyance, it means that the court has made a decision to put the proceeding on hold for a specific amount of time, or until something specific occurs.
Now, what is going to occur on or before 19 October 2022!!! I don't think it is GME but I do think it could be when PDJT goes before the "fake" committee and blows it up!!!! JMHO!!! 😎😎😎😎😎😎
Reagan appointee
Attempting to use a civil case to force access to sworn sealed Grand Jury info should be a criminal offense.
No decisions on:
•The Temporary Restraining Order
•The Motion for Preliminary Injunction
•The Motion for Order to Show Cause
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65339680/konnech-inc-v-true-the-vote-inc/