They are saying a “significant national security matter”. They will somehow claim the Trump had “top secret” documents at MAL that he shouldn’t have had.
The strategy of setting a precedent that will apply to them as well, is, imho a false hope. The law is irrelevant to the lawless. It's like quoting scripture to those who do not recognize it's authority. It means nothing to them.
Wouldn't put it past them. But it needs to be more that "a threat to our democracy".
They are saying a “significant national security matter”. They will somehow claim the Trump had “top secret” documents at MAL that he shouldn’t have had.
Some such nonsense for sure. I hope all the precedents they are setting will haunt democrats forever.
The strategy of setting a precedent that will apply to them as well, is, imho a false hope. The law is irrelevant to the lawless. It's like quoting scripture to those who do not recognize it's authority. It means nothing to them.
"think mirror" -> precedents must be set
It's like asking the psychopaths that rule earth for mercy.
I find "precedence" to be a legal cop-out to avoid having to make their own decisions.