This is so stupid. He is warning them because they are human and he gives warnings about different kinds of sin every day as the leader of the largest religion in the world. Seriously, stop it. It’s stupid.
Besides - Non-dogmatic (praxis) tradition has changed many times. Are women still compelled to weir hair coverings as Paul implores?
If you want to understand the Bible, you don’t look to interpretation that emerged 1500 years after the fact. That’s what democrats do with the Constitution. With the constitution, you look to the other documents of the founders and framers to understand intent.
In the same way, look to those who were there while the New Testament was still not yet compiled as one book. Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome, Hyppolatus, etc
Also - God didn’t “make Jesus” the leader of religion.
Jesus IS GOD. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Jesus (God) made Peter the leader of the Universal (Katholikos) Church on Earth and gave Peter the authority to FORGIVE AND RETAIN SINS!!! And to BIND AND LOOSE.
Peter used that binding/loosing power to continue to pass on the position of the visible head if the church on earth (we call it the papacy in english).
No one claims the church “belongs “ to the pope. The pope us the head pastor and has spiritual authority to forgive and retain sins and bind and loose (along with the other bishops).
Jesus left us a Church, and put Peter in charge of it. The magisterium of the catholic church has protected against and avoided the error of the protestants, of interpreting things however a person wants, for 2000 years, meanwhile the non-catholic christians come up with a new denomination every 6 minutes and it’s based on a disagreement with wherever they came from. Even with evil popes, sacred scripture and sacred tradition are protected.
If the bible proves catholicism isn’t real, why wouldn’t the catholics just remove those verses? Oh right - because Martin Luther was the only one removing scripture. Did you know he tried to remove Hebrews, James, and Revelation?
That’s right. And the catholic church is what you refer to. It is not a “denomination.” Denomination refers to breaking apart. It was one, holy, catholic, and apostolic until the 1500’s when Luther made his big mistake. There were no “denominations” until then.
The pope at the time is who approved and canonized the bible. The Church is literally why the bible is one book.
This is so stupid. He is warning them because they are human and he gives warnings about different kinds of sin every day as the leader of the largest religion in the world. Seriously, stop it. It’s stupid.
IF HE HAS A FAMILY.
Besides - Non-dogmatic (praxis) tradition has changed many times. Are women still compelled to weir hair coverings as Paul implores?
If you want to understand the Bible, you don’t look to interpretation that emerged 1500 years after the fact. That’s what democrats do with the Constitution. With the constitution, you look to the other documents of the founders and framers to understand intent.
In the same way, look to those who were there while the New Testament was still not yet compiled as one book. Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome, Hyppolatus, etc
read 1 cor 7 with understanding
for those who have children the question is relevant. Many of the early bishops had no children.
Also - God didn’t “make Jesus” the leader of religion.
Jesus IS GOD. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Jesus (God) made Peter the leader of the Universal (Katholikos) Church on Earth and gave Peter the authority to FORGIVE AND RETAIN SINS!!! And to BIND AND LOOSE.
Peter used that binding/loosing power to continue to pass on the position of the visible head if the church on earth (we call it the papacy in english).
No one claims the church “belongs “ to the pope. The pope us the head pastor and has spiritual authority to forgive and retain sins and bind and loose (along with the other bishops).
Jesus left us a Church, and put Peter in charge of it. The magisterium of the catholic church has protected against and avoided the error of the protestants, of interpreting things however a person wants, for 2000 years, meanwhile the non-catholic christians come up with a new denomination every 6 minutes and it’s based on a disagreement with wherever they came from. Even with evil popes, sacred scripture and sacred tradition are protected.
If the bible proves catholicism isn’t real, why wouldn’t the catholics just remove those verses? Oh right - because Martin Luther was the only one removing scripture. Did you know he tried to remove Hebrews, James, and Revelation?
The bible is catholic
The Bible doesn’t have a denomination. And we are the church, the people. Christians. Not some building lathed in gold.
Jesus doesn’t have a denomination. He IS.
That’s right. And the catholic church is what you refer to. It is not a “denomination.” Denomination refers to breaking apart. It was one, holy, catholic, and apostolic until the 1500’s when Luther made his big mistake. There were no “denominations” until then.
The pope at the time is who approved and canonized the bible. The Church is literally why the bible is one book.
your argument here reminds be of a famous character from literature. I believe you are also tilting at windmills here. I do agree with you though.
this isn’t “my argument”
This is literally the first 1500 years after Christ