Happy 5th Birthday Q
LET'S GOOoOoOo
It seems like only yesterday!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
It clearly specifies she'll be arrested in 2017 but disinfo is necessary.
Yet we will still tell you the actual date, simply the year is a ruse
Why though? If telling the exact date is bad because she would have time to prepare, why still narrow it down to 1/365th of her life that she has to be worried about and take precautions for, allowing her to do whatever she wants during the other 99.9% of her life?
Why put enough of your intentions on front street for the criminals to avoid your nets, while not giving your students any concrete timeframe beyond "once a year, get your hopes up"?
I'll be honest, I never understood the idea that the master plan is out there for us to see, and us being able to decode it in no way means the plan is inherently suspect because ANYONE CAN DECODE IT INCLUDING THE PEOPLE THE PLAN IS SUPPOSED TO CATCH. I just don't buy that Q is talking at some frequency that center-lib hawks with a small army of support staff at their fingers are incapable of hearing.
This idea carried water in the first few months, when Q was just a non-tripfag 4chan meme - it's much harder to swallow in a world with multiple books and podcasts about Q readily accessible, and years of dated events and post-hoc deltas have all failed to pass.
So, another year old stealth account made en mass, like so many others that adds nothing to the conversation that every reddit "top mind" that has come over here and used the same "logic".
That is not an argument! Also, not a redditer and I don't think of myself as very stealth. More inconsistent in active use.
I'm just saying it doesn't make sense to me, to announce your plans in a manner oblique enough for your adherents to keep making guesses and proclamations that turn out to be wrong, but specific enough to give your adversaries a leg up. If you can't even say it makes sense to you, nonetheless try to pull the wool from my eyes, and just throw lame ad hominems around... Well, it doesn't exactly dissuade me from thinking the most popular interpretations of Q are at best misguided.
I could absolutely see an argument that Q conducting business in this way is a matter of honor, like throwing a sword to an unarmed person who challenged you to a duel, or giving your prey a head start so you can have an honorable hunt. You can have that one for free. I just have yet to see a theory that articulates how this is a wise or effective strategy.
I apologize if I am late to the party and this is a line of questioning that has been thoroughly dismantled and answered months and months ago. If that is the case, as the self-proclaimed public face of Q, there should probably be an FAQ I could be linked to that answers this common question?
loads of q predictions came to pass. There's a whole thread on here detailing like 30 of them ffs. You're chatting shit
I was being sarcastic
That was not clear! Is disinfo not necessary? Are you saying that we will know the year and not the date? What part was sarcastic?
Actually, can you just tell me plainly what you meant? Communicating sarcasm through plain text is never a guaranteed success.
That's fair. I was being sarcastic about the entire concept of deltas. I think it's absurd to give a date to something with a specific year but then pretend although it didn't happen then it will happen the next year or the next year (5 times now) as though the date has some significance despite the year being off. The cope would be that the reason it didn't occur in 2017 is because "disinfo" is necessary, but for some reason there is still meaning to the date... Somehow