its not explosives either. there's a reason the seismic activity did not match a million tons of debris hitting the ground. those towers turned into powder on the way down.
IIRC the framework of a tower like those would likely survive a normal explosive anyway. Even targeted explosives. It would need some serious focus (probably) to bring it down, as in a willful act.
Steel could melt as people have pointed out many times, not by the jet fuel but by the friction and speed of impact, and all it would need is a brief moment of such high temperatures.
But that doesn't explain the fall looking like target demolitions. If there were, say, 8 beams making the bulk of the support framework (arbitrary) and two of them melted, it would fall lopsided and much more sloppily.
I truly hope one day we get the unaltered truth of that moment. It was that moment, of moments, where we descended down this tyrannical road and our government reached for power beyond what the Constitution allots, and they haven't stopped reaching.
Hell, the first attempt in the 90's. Trump himself said in an interview right after 9/11 said that he went down there and half the support columns were missing from the truck explosion, but it was still standing.
Even as a teenager who bought into it "just being a terrorist attack" at the time the way the towers collapsed still bothered me on a subconscious level.
somebody did the math to determine how much energy would be needed to turn that much steel and concrete and furnishings into dust before it could hit the ground. they concluded the buildings would need to be constructed mostly from explosives in order to achieve this. not to mention the dust cloud from this effect would be pyroclastic (but it clearly wasn't on that day as nobody was burned by it). what we witnessed (and the world at large witnessed) that day was a demonstration of exotic weapons technology. I like to call it the Jewish Space Laser. Many people think that is antisemitic, regardless of its truthfulness.
You are 100% correct. There was a 911 video posted on YouTube where you could watch the top of a tower, a metal rod poking straight up, literally turn to dust. It hadn't exploded - in fact the building was just starting to collapse. But that pole turned to dust right before my eyes. That convinced me there was something more at play than just explosives.
all these paint a clear picture for me at least. watching the core column blow away in the wind is just extra confirmation. it is impossible to make happen what we witnessed that day absent some sort of exotic technology. it was a demonstration to the world of jewish weapons supremacy, likely appropriated from US MIL funded and designed tech. Israel has a colorful history of stealing our military secrets.
its not explosives either. there's a reason the seismic activity did not match a million tons of debris hitting the ground. those towers turned into powder on the way down.
IIRC the framework of a tower like those would likely survive a normal explosive anyway. Even targeted explosives. It would need some serious focus (probably) to bring it down, as in a willful act.
Steel could melt as people have pointed out many times, not by the jet fuel but by the friction and speed of impact, and all it would need is a brief moment of such high temperatures.
But that doesn't explain the fall looking like target demolitions. If there were, say, 8 beams making the bulk of the support framework (arbitrary) and two of them melted, it would fall lopsided and much more sloppily.
I truly hope one day we get the unaltered truth of that moment. It was that moment, of moments, where we descended down this tyrannical road and our government reached for power beyond what the Constitution allots, and they haven't stopped reaching.
Hell, the first attempt in the 90's. Trump himself said in an interview right after 9/11 said that he went down there and half the support columns were missing from the truck explosion, but it was still standing.
Even as a teenager who bought into it "just being a terrorist attack" at the time the way the towers collapsed still bothered me on a subconscious level.
Search for Judy Wood.
somebody did the math to determine how much energy would be needed to turn that much steel and concrete and furnishings into dust before it could hit the ground. they concluded the buildings would need to be constructed mostly from explosives in order to achieve this. not to mention the dust cloud from this effect would be pyroclastic (but it clearly wasn't on that day as nobody was burned by it). what we witnessed (and the world at large witnessed) that day was a demonstration of exotic weapons technology. I like to call it the Jewish Space Laser. Many people think that is antisemitic, regardless of its truthfulness.
You are 100% correct. There was a 911 video posted on YouTube where you could watch the top of a tower, a metal rod poking straight up, literally turn to dust. It hadn't exploded - in fact the building was just starting to collapse. But that pole turned to dust right before my eyes. That convinced me there was something more at play than just explosives.
ambient temp dust cloud.
lack of seismic activity.
lack of debris pile.
all these paint a clear picture for me at least. watching the core column blow away in the wind is just extra confirmation. it is impossible to make happen what we witnessed that day absent some sort of exotic technology. it was a demonstration to the world of jewish weapons supremacy, likely appropriated from US MIL funded and designed tech. Israel has a colorful history of stealing our military secrets.