In PA; Fetterman vs. Dr. Oz and Shapiro vs. Mastriano!! And now there is AZ; Kari Lake, Blake Masters and Finshem! Who's with me?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Most of my comments never get any attention because I'm posting during the night shift on hours-old posts, but here goes. I've been thinking about it and it makes sense. That battle would not have been won regardless. Barnett was definitely far more MAGA, but Trump did not use her as a pawn and instead he chose Oz as a pawn. But why?
He chose to endorse a pro-abortion, phony TV celebrity "doctor" and Muzzrat against a Monster Squad meatsack with a malfunctioning brain. The way I see it, if he had chosen the better candidate, her loss would not have been noticed much. But putting Oz in the picture was like shining a national spotlight on how shitty the situation is. The seat would not have been flipped red anyway, so he may as well use a high-profile dickbrain as a pawn to show the country how stupid, loathsome, and pathetic the Decepticons are.
They even had a "big" rally for Fetterman with both Bathhhouse Barry AND Mr. Sniffy. They had to put up a big curtain to cut the stadium in half, and even with that the upper seats were not used much at all. That was the best they could muster in PA. He was diverting their energy on an election they were gonna steal anyway while there were victories elsewhere.
The way I see it, Trump spared Barnett and used Oz as a pawn instead. Let Oz waste his money on a doomed election. But since normies know Oz, they might pay attention and saw him lose to a braindead cross between Uncle Fester and Commander Kane.
To your point, the Senate race in PA was one the GOP actually did endorse. McConnell dropped damn near $60 million into that one in fact! While pulling 9 mil from Masters and putting it into Murkowski (who was behind Tshibaka last I checked?)
Maybe we need to look a little deeper at the results of this midterm and who won and lost. Trump said 'Vote Republican no matter what and we'll sort it out later" Why? Was there a possible other meaning to that? Maybe Trump was interested in causing material losses to GOP via certain candidates that both he and they endorsed, effectively bringing them into the fight against fraud by costing them their chosen candidates and the $ spent by McConnell and GOP on them. Also could be some kind of retaliation against McConnell and the Republican leadership; Trump said the other day he'd prefer Rick Scott as the Senate leader.
He made another comment about JD Vance at the Dayton rally, saying that "nobody owns him... I don't [own him] although I'd like to, but he's [independent minded]" something to that effect. I think Vance was another establishment-approved one; Hershel also cuts across the MAGA/GOP lines being endorsed by Graham Gingrich and others.
Maybe when we tally up the W-L column we aren't truly seeing it all from the Trump-White Hat perspective. They may have pushed along some candidates like Oz or Tudor Dixon knowing and intending for them to lose, in order to continue to expose rampant voter fraud in certain places, and to cause losses of $ and political capital to the Republican establishment, engaging them in the fight with voter fraud and forcing them into a position where they need to ally with the MAGA wing more than ever. Look at how the MSM wants to immediately drive a wedge between the GOP (DeSantis) and MAGA following this midterm... it may be more important right now to take on and expose the enemies on our own side, and draw clear lines in the sand ahead of what's coming next.
Just a thought, Godspeed.
https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109312374867693228 Trump said is was a good night.
Absolutely the best explanation, fren! Power to the night shift 🔥👊🏼