Good find...Jekyll and Hyde on steroids. They always present this kind of technology wrapped in the "help humanity" lies but soon use it for destruction, manipulation and control. The whole Crispr technology is right up there with nanotechnology that can be used for good or evil depending on who is using it.
Nanomachine is the general term for a machine ranging in size from one micrometer (one-thousandth of a millimeter) to one nanometer (one-millionth of a millimeter) using MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) technology. An example of a nanomachine would be a protein aggregate resembling the structure of a man-made motor using biomolecules such as DNA, proteins, and resins as parts. Nanomachines are used to alter the bodies of human hosts.
Gene therapy is horse cookies. Like the A.I BS, it's a scam. Nanobots are just particles that are artificially shaped using magnets. The Jabs are making ppl sick because the shard like particles found in the jab embed themselves into arterial walls and are sensitive to high frequency waves. when exposed to ELFs they begin to ionize so as to form a static charge. This charge attracts dead cell particles (and given enough time) form snake like clusters that they mistakenly (and on purpose) call blood clots. These strain of dead cells begin to clog the circulatory system which cause the heart to work harder thus getting bigger to the point of being unable to function properly . The initial stage of what the msm labeled Covid 19 was nothing more than malaria delivered by regular plague ridden mosquitos released by Bill Gates. This operation in numbers was a dismal failure so the MSM was told to hype the few cases to make it appear that is was a pandemic They also labeled deaths by others causes as "covid related" to inflate the figures
Whatever you may think of Covid-19, it is transmissible among human beings. It was passing from person to person where there were no mosquitoes to pass along malaria. (My wife got it from the local gym environment, and I got it from her. And we both survived.) Malaria does not leave the kinds of problems reported in the VAERS system. Nobody experiences "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" from malaria. (My family is in a land that is chronically subject to malaria. They could tell the difference between Covid-19, which was killing some of them, and malaria which is under control.)
No, it is not. Ppl died from malaria and or influenza. The latter stop being reported and replaced as covid deaths. Nothing the media said was true. It was a complete fabrication. The spread of malaria can only be controlled through heavy spraying. Which the neglected to do in 2020, sighting environmental concerns. A lot of palms were greased that year.
You will not survive in world of lies and truths, for you will deem the truth a lie. You can't tell the difference, so you cast a pox on all the news. It was a coronavirus, which is a broad family that includes influenza and colds. It is probably true that the older, weaker, more vulnerable were allowed to die of influenza as well as Covid and pneumonia. But that doesn't include a whole lot of people who were not in that category and for whom the symptoms were distinct from the flu. But you are already in the frame of mind that would hold symptoms to be irrelevant.
Malaria is controlled by having an effective therapy (hydroxychloroquine), which is available to all those who are in regions afflicted with malaria. You can't spray the entire countryside. DDT is effective in settled areas---if you can get it. About 2,000 cases of malaria are diagnosed each year in the United States, and it propagates by an amoebic cell, not by a virus. It is easily identified, so I don't put any credence in the confusion being so bad as you say. Plenty of confusion, but not about that. Except in your thinking.
Yes we know how to battle malaria. Easy enough but, the resources to fight malaria were never allotted because of the big lie. The masks poisoning ppl with Graphene Oxide were ignored despite its known toxicity. The detection kits were fake, the diagnoses were fake, most of the deaths were caused by other things but, labeled as covid deaths. The planned pandemic failed so they tried to make up for the projected losses with the death jab. This also failed but, roughly about 500 million will die. This was a huge operation that bankrupted many black hats and for you to be basing your info on outright msn propaganda is baffling.
I don't know why you go on about malaria, which is a rare disease in the U.S. and could never have accounted for the number of Covid deaths. The "resources" are hydroxychloroquine, which is cheap and readily available---unless the government puts it out of reach. What msn propaganda? You are jumping into a puddle of ignorance.
For your information---because you will never suspect this otherwise---I was following the bungled handling from the beginning. My "tell" was the bogus information they provided about HCQ. It was also beginning to be apparent that the recommended early treatment (let it get worse to the point of death) was wrong and that the late treatment (homicide by intubation and remdesivir) was also wrong. The vaccines were wrong, which is why my wife and I avoided them like the death they would be (to me particularly, as I have a sensitivity to clotting). I also made an early attempt to disentangle the data on deaths due to Covid, influenza, and pneumonia, and discovered that the key data (isolated Covid deaths) was missing---so it was clear that there was conflation of cause.
But, because I am not an idiot, I did not arrive at the conclusion that "there was no Covid." Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (RIP) did not arrive at that conclusion, and developed his life-saving protocol. Other doctors similarly came out in the same way, strongly supporting the life-saving HCQ and Ivermectin. Are they idiots? I don't think so. I think you should have second thoughts, because you are not in good company. In Zambia, malaria is common and flu is well known---but people were being killed by Covid (admittedly, by the administrative protocol). It was NOT malaria that killed anyone. HCQ use is widespread and probably accounted for the relatively low incidence of Covid there.
I didn't base any information on "msm propaganda," but you sure seem to be pulling fantasy out of thin air to think there was literally nothing going on.
Well, a particle is not a "machine" by any stretch of the imagination. Micron-sized particles are old hat. Current technology can develop "nanoscale" particles, a thousand times smaller.
You don't have any idea how nanotechnolgy works (as a machine), yet you grab onto the flimsiest support to "prove" nanobots (or whatever) exist and are being used. 500 years ago, it was witchcraft---equally real. You will invent your own devils and be terrified of them.
They aren't merely suggesting the above is possible. They are saying they already have working proof of concepts. They claim that they can make machines using DNA as the scaffolding.
This was in 1999.
You can't convince me we haven't made any progress towards the "nanomachine dream" in the 23 years since this was released.
Cells contain exquisite naturally occurring "molecular motors." One of many examples of these naturally occurring nanomachines is Fl-ATPase, which is part of the large, membrane-embedded complex that synthesizes ATP within mitochondria (Figure 8.1). This structure, only about 10 nm in size, is a robust, fully functional rotating motor that is powered by natural biochemical processes. In 1998 the Amersham Pharmacia Biotech and Science Prize was awarded to Hiroyuki Noji, a young Japanese scientist who demonstrated the function of this molecular motor by attaching a long actin filament to the rotating part of the motor and observing the rotation in an optical microscope. The detailed understanding of the structure and function of this motor protein and other macromolecular assemblies essential for life is an area of growing scientific importance.
The precise pattern and periodicity of the tiles can be modified by
altering DNA sequence, allowing the formation of specific lattices with programmable
structures and features at a nanometer scale.
You can call it what you want and argue semantics all day, but that last line highlighted in the OP image sure does sound like a programmable "robot" using DNA is definitely on the table. You may not want to call them "nanomachines" just to be argumentative, but that's effectively what they are. Little machines we programmed to do stuff, up to and including building more of themselves.
No moving parts. Not a machine. I'm not being "argumentative." I'm just using words for what they mean. I think I have some expertise, being an engineer for 50 years. You are in the position of calling an amoeba a zebra.
At best, what they describe might be a tool. For what, I don't know. Just because nature can come up with all kinds of mechanism does not mean we are as smart as nature. And certainly no basis for thinking we have mastered it as an accomplished fact.
I don't know what it is, but the more that people really don't understand the reality of science, they are really willing to embrace the fantasy of science. I guess it is because they don't understand how big the steps are between points of progress.
This approach has the potential to lead to the use of designed DNA crystals as scaffolds for the crystallization of macromolecules, as materials for use as catalysts, as molecular sieves, or as scaffolds for the assembly of molecular electronic components or biochips in DNA-based computers. Similarly, biological-molecule-based scaffolding could take advantage of the unique structural characteristics of RNA molecules, of polypeptide chains, or of the highly specific interactions that occur between DNA and proteins or between RNA and proteins.
Devices that are currently in use to control the interactions of DNA on surfaces can have broader applications for controlling nanoassembly. These devices use electric fields to control the movement of particles toward or away from microscopic sites on the device surface. Charged biological molecules (DNA, RNA, protein) and analytes, cells, and other nanoscale or microscale charged particles can be precisely organized.
Good find...Jekyll and Hyde on steroids. They always present this kind of technology wrapped in the "help humanity" lies but soon use it for destruction, manipulation and control. The whole Crispr technology is right up there with nanotechnology that can be used for good or evil depending on who is using it.
SNAAAAAAAKE!
Nanomachine is the general term for a machine ranging in size from one micrometer (one-thousandth of a millimeter) to one nanometer (one-millionth of a millimeter) using MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) technology. An example of a nanomachine would be a protein aggregate resembling the structure of a man-made motor using biomolecules such as DNA, proteins, and resins as parts. Nanomachines are used to alter the bodies of human hosts.
Gene therapy is horse cookies. Like the A.I BS, it's a scam. Nanobots are just particles that are artificially shaped using magnets. The Jabs are making ppl sick because the shard like particles found in the jab embed themselves into arterial walls and are sensitive to high frequency waves. when exposed to ELFs they begin to ionize so as to form a static charge. This charge attracts dead cell particles (and given enough time) form snake like clusters that they mistakenly (and on purpose) call blood clots. These strain of dead cells begin to clog the circulatory system which cause the heart to work harder thus getting bigger to the point of being unable to function properly . The initial stage of what the msm labeled Covid 19 was nothing more than malaria delivered by regular plague ridden mosquitos released by Bill Gates. This operation in numbers was a dismal failure so the MSM was told to hype the few cases to make it appear that is was a pandemic They also labeled deaths by others causes as "covid related" to inflate the figures
This is a mixture of far-out speculation and sheer nonsense. People with malaria cannot infect each other.
Who said ppl can spread it?...oh wait the msn did.
Whatever you may think of Covid-19, it is transmissible among human beings. It was passing from person to person where there were no mosquitoes to pass along malaria. (My wife got it from the local gym environment, and I got it from her. And we both survived.) Malaria does not leave the kinds of problems reported in the VAERS system. Nobody experiences "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" from malaria. (My family is in a land that is chronically subject to malaria. They could tell the difference between Covid-19, which was killing some of them, and malaria which is under control.)
No, it is not. Ppl died from malaria and or influenza. The latter stop being reported and replaced as covid deaths. Nothing the media said was true. It was a complete fabrication. The spread of malaria can only be controlled through heavy spraying. Which the neglected to do in 2020, sighting environmental concerns. A lot of palms were greased that year.
You will not survive in world of lies and truths, for you will deem the truth a lie. You can't tell the difference, so you cast a pox on all the news. It was a coronavirus, which is a broad family that includes influenza and colds. It is probably true that the older, weaker, more vulnerable were allowed to die of influenza as well as Covid and pneumonia. But that doesn't include a whole lot of people who were not in that category and for whom the symptoms were distinct from the flu. But you are already in the frame of mind that would hold symptoms to be irrelevant.
Malaria is controlled by having an effective therapy (hydroxychloroquine), which is available to all those who are in regions afflicted with malaria. You can't spray the entire countryside. DDT is effective in settled areas---if you can get it. About 2,000 cases of malaria are diagnosed each year in the United States, and it propagates by an amoebic cell, not by a virus. It is easily identified, so I don't put any credence in the confusion being so bad as you say. Plenty of confusion, but not about that. Except in your thinking.
Yes we know how to battle malaria. Easy enough but, the resources to fight malaria were never allotted because of the big lie. The masks poisoning ppl with Graphene Oxide were ignored despite its known toxicity. The detection kits were fake, the diagnoses were fake, most of the deaths were caused by other things but, labeled as covid deaths. The planned pandemic failed so they tried to make up for the projected losses with the death jab. This also failed but, roughly about 500 million will die. This was a huge operation that bankrupted many black hats and for you to be basing your info on outright msn propaganda is baffling.
I don't know why you go on about malaria, which is a rare disease in the U.S. and could never have accounted for the number of Covid deaths. The "resources" are hydroxychloroquine, which is cheap and readily available---unless the government puts it out of reach. What msn propaganda? You are jumping into a puddle of ignorance.
For your information---because you will never suspect this otherwise---I was following the bungled handling from the beginning. My "tell" was the bogus information they provided about HCQ. It was also beginning to be apparent that the recommended early treatment (let it get worse to the point of death) was wrong and that the late treatment (homicide by intubation and remdesivir) was also wrong. The vaccines were wrong, which is why my wife and I avoided them like the death they would be (to me particularly, as I have a sensitivity to clotting). I also made an early attempt to disentangle the data on deaths due to Covid, influenza, and pneumonia, and discovered that the key data (isolated Covid deaths) was missing---so it was clear that there was conflation of cause.
But, because I am not an idiot, I did not arrive at the conclusion that "there was no Covid." Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (RIP) did not arrive at that conclusion, and developed his life-saving protocol. Other doctors similarly came out in the same way, strongly supporting the life-saving HCQ and Ivermectin. Are they idiots? I don't think so. I think you should have second thoughts, because you are not in good company. In Zambia, malaria is common and flu is well known---but people were being killed by Covid (admittedly, by the administrative protocol). It was NOT malaria that killed anyone. HCQ use is widespread and probably accounted for the relatively low incidence of Covid there.
I didn't base any information on "msm propaganda," but you sure seem to be pulling fantasy out of thin air to think there was literally nothing going on.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA418616.pdf
Well, a particle is not a "machine" by any stretch of the imagination. Micron-sized particles are old hat. Current technology can develop "nanoscale" particles, a thousand times smaller.
You don't have any idea how nanotechnolgy works (as a machine), yet you grab onto the flimsiest support to "prove" nanobots (or whatever) exist and are being used. 500 years ago, it was witchcraft---equally real. You will invent your own devils and be terrified of them.
I guess you haven't read the full report then...
They aren't merely suggesting the above is possible. They are saying they already have working proof of concepts. They claim that they can make machines using DNA as the scaffolding.
This was in 1999.
You can't convince me we haven't made any progress towards the "nanomachine dream" in the 23 years since this was released.
You can call it what you want and argue semantics all day, but that last line highlighted in the OP image sure does sound like a programmable "robot" using DNA is definitely on the table. You may not want to call them "nanomachines" just to be argumentative, but that's effectively what they are. Little machines we programmed to do stuff, up to and including building more of themselves.
No moving parts. Not a machine. I'm not being "argumentative." I'm just using words for what they mean. I think I have some expertise, being an engineer for 50 years. You are in the position of calling an amoeba a zebra.
At best, what they describe might be a tool. For what, I don't know. Just because nature can come up with all kinds of mechanism does not mean we are as smart as nature. And certainly no basis for thinking we have mastered it as an accomplished fact.
I don't know what it is, but the more that people really don't understand the reality of science, they are really willing to embrace the fantasy of science. I guess it is because they don't understand how big the steps are between points of progress.
This approach has the potential to lead to the use of designed DNA crystals as scaffolds for the crystallization of macromolecules, as materials for use as catalysts, as molecular sieves, or as scaffolds for the assembly of molecular electronic components or biochips in DNA-based computers. Similarly, biological-molecule-based scaffolding could take advantage of the unique structural characteristics of RNA molecules, of polypeptide chains, or of the highly specific interactions that occur between DNA and proteins or between RNA and proteins.
Devices that are currently in use to control the interactions of DNA on surfaces can have broader applications for controlling nanoassembly. These devices use electric fields to control the movement of particles toward or away from microscopic sites on the device surface. Charged biological molecules (DNA, RNA, protein) and analytes, cells, and other nanoscale or microscale charged particles can be precisely organized.