Uh, guys... a Supreme Court case regarding the 2020 election just hit the docket. A fellow pede posted it in a random thread.
(www.supremecourt.gov)
💊 RAW UNCUT HOPIUM 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (144)
sorted by:
I have read conflicting information because on one hand the SC may not have that power as some are citing Separation of Powers (this power belongs to the States when it comes to election fraud). But on the other hand when it comes to treasonous activity the SC does have that power.
The SC's duty is to uphold the Constitution.
Period.
One thing everyone is missing. SCOTUS had multiple chances to hear election cases and they did not. Do you believe they will hear this case?
What will happen in the middle of oral arguments when one of the defendant's lawyers asks SCOTUS how they can rule against most of congress, POTUS, and VP when SCOTUS is just as culpable for not addressing it when they themselves had the chance?
My guess is there is zero chance they will touch it.
If you are saying that 9 Americans will refuse to uphold their oaths of office because it is a hard decision, I cannot say you are wrong.
Pretty much, although I'd love to know if all 9 denied the other cases or if some approved. The only one I really trust is Clarence Thomas. If he denies it then I'm certain there is a good, legal reason to deny.