They couldn’t hide the truth forever. You cannot undo the clot shot. So I guess they can just say Oops and let bygones be bygones.
Nobody seems to talk about the baby formula shortage anymore. Last I checked it was still going on. Trump has mentioned it in his most recent rallies though. So the reason I bring it up now is because it was a way to force mothers to choose to nurse their babies rather than give them formula. This is why it has been so prolonged. Most babies born after the shortage started would have to be nursed. Thus receiving the vaccine through nursing from a vaccinated mother. Think about that! Sterilization and shortened life expectancy.
It's still being pushed on some "health" sites. I have a trip to Cuba planned, and the site my doctor checked suggests both the flu and Covid shots. I passed on both, but the fact that they're still pushing the clot shot is morally offensive.
This is a BS headline (and it's unsauced). I'd like to know who wrote the headline because it's clear whoever wrote it can't understand what's in that study. It says nothing of the sort. (Link to Oster et al, Jan 2022, JAMA)
What they did:
Look through VAERS, then attempt to establish the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis based upon national figures of vaccine injections given vs physician-verified diagnoses of myocarditis reported in VAERS.
What they found:
Myocarditis occurred within 7 days of injection in ~1900 reports of which ~1600 could be reasonably confirmed according to a standard definition. Most of them occurred among young men. It was more likely from the Moderna vaccine than the Pfizer one. Women accounted for ~20% of the cases vs ~80% for men.
They present an incidence between 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 100,000 based on your individual risk characteristics.
Flaws with the study:
VAERS reporting is not mandatory. Further, reporting of vaccine adverse effects is spread across multiple databases from CDC's V-Safe database to the individual vaccine manufacturer's private post-marketing surveillance databases. VAERS is incomplete and widely acknowledged to be grossly underreported. Therefore, incidence cannot be calculated from this data.
The study limits the definition of myocarditis to diagnosis within 7 days of receiving the injection. It does not allow for the possibility of myocarditis with a larger delay before onset. It is commonly reported that there is a delay of several weeks or even months prior to presentation of symptoms with no other causative factor. By restricting the definition to within 7 days of injection, it increases the certainty that the vaccine is the one and only cause, but it also likely undercounts the number of cases by precluding a delayed presentation.
The authors actually do a reasonable job of assessing the limitations of their study in the text, for which they should receive credit.
At no point does this 13,200% increase come up, nor any mention of autoimmune disease. Myocarditis is simply inflammation, regardless of the cause. Here, the working theory is that the spike protein is causing inflammation. It is not explicitly autoimmune. Whoever wrote the headline doesn't know what he's talking about. Whoever posted it here should have been more skeptical, and asked if this was legit. If we're going to have a discussion about the vaccines, it should be fact-based, not screeching lunacy.
If you want context for this, compare to the benefit. What is the absolute risk reduction of severe COVID requiring hospitalization or death? The vaccine doesn't stop you getting the disease or spreading it. It only reduces your risk of ending up in the hospital. Comparing that rare possibility with the rare possibility of myocarditis is the proper risk-benefit assessment. If you're young and healthy, the vaccine looks much less attractive. If you're old or have many risk factors, you still may want the vaccine. Speak to your doctor who knows you if you have questions.
It also causes cancer. Pisses me off! One friends husband died after taking the jab from cancer (found in 2 different places). Now another friend's husband has cancer and yes he took the jab also, as did both of my friends. Of course, neither friend even contemplates that the jab caused the cancers and won't even think about taking (or looking up if it could help) ivermectin. Goes straight to surgery & chemo. Some people don't want to wake up and realize what they did to themselves by willing getting the jab. I haven't told them that it's highly possible that the jab did this to their husbands. They are good people and good friends, hate to lose our friendship over something that they can't change now, I begged them not to get the shots. I keep hoping they stop listening to the media and start realizing what is going on, but it's not looking like they will. The friend that her husband now has cancer said she is doing tons of reading up on his cancer, fingers crossed she stumbles across some info that wakes her up.
Sauce?
Looks like it came from a Reddit post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ywnync/cdc_study_confirms_covid_vaccination_increases/
Thank you Fren… was digging for that..
The post has replies that reference this study:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346
I tried to read it but my brain said "words,words numbers, numbers, blah, blah" so I don't know what it says.
Did a search for the quoted increase number, it's not in the article.
Op didn't link the sauce because op made up numbers.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346
Do ctrl+f text search. His numbers are not present in the article though the miocarditis risk increase is clearly outlined.
OP is a sensationalist. No better than MSM.
Sin today, tomorrow repent at leisure.
They couldn’t hide the truth forever. You cannot undo the clot shot. So I guess they can just say Oops and let bygones be bygones.
Nobody seems to talk about the baby formula shortage anymore. Last I checked it was still going on. Trump has mentioned it in his most recent rallies though. So the reason I bring it up now is because it was a way to force mothers to choose to nurse their babies rather than give them formula. This is why it has been so prolonged. Most babies born after the shortage started would have to be nursed. Thus receiving the vaccine through nursing from a vaccinated mother. Think about that! Sterilization and shortened life expectancy.
It's still being pushed on some "health" sites. I have a trip to Cuba planned, and the site my doctor checked suggests both the flu and Covid shots. I passed on both, but the fact that they're still pushing the clot shot is morally offensive.
This is a BS headline (and it's unsauced). I'd like to know who wrote the headline because it's clear whoever wrote it can't understand what's in that study. It says nothing of the sort. (Link to Oster et al, Jan 2022, JAMA)
What they did: Look through VAERS, then attempt to establish the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis based upon national figures of vaccine injections given vs physician-verified diagnoses of myocarditis reported in VAERS.
What they found: Myocarditis occurred within 7 days of injection in ~1900 reports of which ~1600 could be reasonably confirmed according to a standard definition. Most of them occurred among young men. It was more likely from the Moderna vaccine than the Pfizer one. Women accounted for ~20% of the cases vs ~80% for men.
They present an incidence between 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 100,000 based on your individual risk characteristics.
Flaws with the study:
VAERS reporting is not mandatory. Further, reporting of vaccine adverse effects is spread across multiple databases from CDC's V-Safe database to the individual vaccine manufacturer's private post-marketing surveillance databases. VAERS is incomplete and widely acknowledged to be grossly underreported. Therefore, incidence cannot be calculated from this data.
The study limits the definition of myocarditis to diagnosis within 7 days of receiving the injection. It does not allow for the possibility of myocarditis with a larger delay before onset. It is commonly reported that there is a delay of several weeks or even months prior to presentation of symptoms with no other causative factor. By restricting the definition to within 7 days of injection, it increases the certainty that the vaccine is the one and only cause, but it also likely undercounts the number of cases by precluding a delayed presentation.
The authors actually do a reasonable job of assessing the limitations of their study in the text, for which they should receive credit.
At no point does this 13,200% increase come up, nor any mention of autoimmune disease. Myocarditis is simply inflammation, regardless of the cause. Here, the working theory is that the spike protein is causing inflammation. It is not explicitly autoimmune. Whoever wrote the headline doesn't know what he's talking about. Whoever posted it here should have been more skeptical, and asked if this was legit. If we're going to have a discussion about the vaccines, it should be fact-based, not screeching lunacy.
If you want context for this, compare to the benefit. What is the absolute risk reduction of severe COVID requiring hospitalization or death? The vaccine doesn't stop you getting the disease or spreading it. It only reduces your risk of ending up in the hospital. Comparing that rare possibility with the rare possibility of myocarditis is the proper risk-benefit assessment. If you're young and healthy, the vaccine looks much less attractive. If you're old or have many risk factors, you still may want the vaccine. Speak to your doctor who knows you if you have questions.
It also causes cancer. Pisses me off! One friends husband died after taking the jab from cancer (found in 2 different places). Now another friend's husband has cancer and yes he took the jab also, as did both of my friends. Of course, neither friend even contemplates that the jab caused the cancers and won't even think about taking (or looking up if it could help) ivermectin. Goes straight to surgery & chemo. Some people don't want to wake up and realize what they did to themselves by willing getting the jab. I haven't told them that it's highly possible that the jab did this to their husbands. They are good people and good friends, hate to lose our friendship over something that they can't change now, I begged them not to get the shots. I keep hoping they stop listening to the media and start realizing what is going on, but it's not looking like they will. The friend that her husband now has cancer said she is doing tons of reading up on his cancer, fingers crossed she stumbles across some info that wakes her up.
Or we unvaxxed can sit back and watch the assholes who discriminated against us die one by one… i got my poppy corn!
This article is almost a year old. They're still giving boosters. We are no where near the precipice.
Yet the CDC is still pushing the shot via commercials on TV prime time.
I'm actually surprised they published that.
No immunity for anyone.
Who?
Some in healthcare are still being forced to take or give up their jobs.