Unless Russia has a nuke lobbed in their backyard, it will NOT launch a nuke. They don’t need too because their missiles are precision guided. Look up the capabilities of the SARMAT. They have said IF a hostile country attacks Russian soil, Russia has the right to defend itself. They have said they can and will target DECISION MAKING CENTRES. So the ball is in the EUs and the West’s court.

Be sure to nuke it while the whole of the Ratschild family is there.

Why would Russia nuke a country that's doing a perfectly good job at obliterating itself already?

If it helps to clear out the Roth swamp - do it. Take the royals out as well, and all the UN puppets. God help us.

Good.

Ever since WW2, the UK has been America's puppet. It provides the US with all kinds of useful things. For instance:

1. Largest aircraft carrier in European waters.

2. An "independent" partner to back up any international action taken by the US.

3. UK intel can pass to US intel information that US intel is prohibited from seeing and vice versa.

4. Plausible deniability as in: "We didn't do it, they did!"

Item 2 was typified by Tony Blair standing "shoulder to shoulder" with GHWB over the Iraq War. Note similarities to Ukraine.

Item 3 is used to allow the US intel agencies to, effectively, spy on Americans.

An Item 4 example is the Steele Dossier. There was also a UK/Iraq Dodgy Dossier.

Decision making centres? GCHQ Cheltenham and Bude.

The City of London and RAF Bentwaters as well as The Carlton Club

A couple of years ago there was a report that the UK had 'lost' the ability to refurbish their trident sub-launched nukes, due to losing all details of key components used in their manufacture. So supposedly, they are all in varying degrees of viability, getting worse over time as the components degrade and cant be replaced.

I wonder if that was russian espionage, messing with a state likely to be an enemy in the near future to degrade their capabilities.