I can sympathize with being a skeptic when it comes to the numbers. I can understand if it was "only" 500,000... what I can't accept is that not ONE WWII vet ever came forward claiming it was fake. Now, if you want to present evidence to the contrary, I will consider it, but as best I can tell, the soldiers who liberated camps saw shit firsthand and not one of them had any conflicting reports. The camps existed, there was a fuck ton of murder. Those facts have been consistent since the war ended.
Has the Nazi bad narrative been beat to a pulp? Yes. Are a lot of atrocities surrounding the Nazi's exaggerated for sympathy points? Absolutely. But this continued notion that it didn't happen and was a confirmed hoax is part of what makes GAW look fucking retarded and rightly so. If you wanna be reasonably skeptical, fine. But show proof of the fabrication. HARD proof that confirms the museums are bunk.
Show proof of any order from Hitler, Himmler or any other high ranking official to anyone to execute Jews in mass. There were multiple concentration camps. We have thousands of Nazi documents. Where is a shred of evidence of this plan of extermination. Where are the autopsies proving death by zyklon B? Where is the proof of this six million number? We're there 6 million Jews to start with in German occupied territories?
The cherry on top of all the lack of evidence are the laws and outrage towards anyone who dares to say anything against the official narrative. Revisionists don't praise Nazis or deny their evil, they only look for what really happened.
The camps were not only holding Jews. The numbers are physically impossible. The delousing chambers could not have worked as poison chambers, their original leaky wooden doors are still on them and they're literally next to hospitals and barracks. Mass graves to account for the amount of dead claimed have never been found. The Jews' own contemporary records do not reflect the numbers they now claim.
No one says nobody was treated badly or killed; the German records show exactly what they were doing. They're known for precision, after all. The records don't show anything like what is now claimed. Even the lies told at the time about monstrous Germans in the official propaganda never claimed a holocaust of Jews.
By the way, Anne Frank's diary was proven in a German court to have been false, written by her uncle for money.
The Germans themselves were starving because all their supply chains were cut off. It's only logical they would feed their own over prisoners in the camps.
It also explains much of the footage I've watched, and also explains why the emaciated prisoners were burying their fellow prisoners who had died in mass graves and seemed like willing participants while doing so.
Did they pose a danger to the moustache mans dEmOcRaCy?
Notice who obsesses about dog whistles that those in the know hear and understand differently than normies do. When normies hear NWO they believe N==New. What do those who understand dog comms think N stands for?
Sum of All Fears, referenced by Q and Q+ many times. Why?
Ukraine/CIA relevance?
It won't be found. The deaths happened. It was all gone over in detail at the Nuremberg Trials and death camp trials. The reality is that the servicemen who knew the truth are all going to their graves without denying it happened.
And yes, it not only makes GAW "look" retarded...it makes GAW itself retarded by its virulent anti-semitism and paranoia (which seems to be infectious). I know the moderators are on the lookout for fringe conspiracies (because they detract from a focus on, and the credibility of, Q posts) and---because they have their hands full---they urge that when purveyors of a fringe conspiracy fly their colors, they should be deported.
I can sympathize with being a skeptic when it comes to the numbers. I can understand if it was "only" 500,000... what I can't accept is that not ONE WWII vet ever came forward claiming it was fake. Now, if you want to present evidence to the contrary, I will consider it, but as best I can tell, the soldiers who liberated camps saw shit firsthand and not one of them had any conflicting reports. The camps existed, there was a fuck ton of murder. Those facts have been consistent since the war ended.
Has the Nazi bad narrative been beat to a pulp? Yes. Are a lot of atrocities surrounding the Nazi's exaggerated for sympathy points? Absolutely. But this continued notion that it didn't happen and was a confirmed hoax is part of what makes GAW look fucking retarded and rightly so. If you wanna be reasonably skeptical, fine. But show proof of the fabrication. HARD proof that confirms the museums are bunk.
Show proof of any order from Hitler, Himmler or any other high ranking official to anyone to execute Jews in mass. There were multiple concentration camps. We have thousands of Nazi documents. Where is a shred of evidence of this plan of extermination. Where are the autopsies proving death by zyklon B? Where is the proof of this six million number? We're there 6 million Jews to start with in German occupied territories?
The cherry on top of all the lack of evidence are the laws and outrage towards anyone who dares to say anything against the official narrative. Revisionists don't praise Nazis or deny their evil, they only look for what really happened.
The camps were not only holding Jews. The numbers are physically impossible. The delousing chambers could not have worked as poison chambers, their original leaky wooden doors are still on them and they're literally next to hospitals and barracks. Mass graves to account for the amount of dead claimed have never been found. The Jews' own contemporary records do not reflect the numbers they now claim.
No one says nobody was treated badly or killed; the German records show exactly what they were doing. They're known for precision, after all. The records don't show anything like what is now claimed. Even the lies told at the time about monstrous Germans in the official propaganda never claimed a holocaust of Jews.
By the way, Anne Frank's diary was proven in a German court to have been false, written by her uncle for money.
The Germans themselves were starving because all their supply chains were cut off. It's only logical they would feed their own over prisoners in the camps.
It also explains much of the footage I've watched, and also explains why the emaciated prisoners were burying their fellow prisoners who had died in mass graves and seemed like willing participants while doing so.
Key words: "prisoners" "in the camps".
Imprisoned " in the camps", why?
Did they pose a danger to the moustache mans dEmOcRaCy?
Notice who obsesses about dog whistles that those in the know hear and understand differently than normies do. When normies hear NWO they believe N==New. What do those who understand dog comms think N stands for?
Sum of All Fears, referenced by Q and Q+ many times. Why? Ukraine/CIA relevance?
It won't be found. The deaths happened. It was all gone over in detail at the Nuremberg Trials and death camp trials. The reality is that the servicemen who knew the truth are all going to their graves without denying it happened.
And yes, it not only makes GAW "look" retarded...it makes GAW itself retarded by its virulent anti-semitism and paranoia (which seems to be infectious). I know the moderators are on the lookout for fringe conspiracies (because they detract from a focus on, and the credibility of, Q posts) and---because they have their hands full---they urge that when purveyors of a fringe conspiracy fly their colors, they should be deported.