Anons research, use logic, evaluate, use expanded thinking and do not engage overly with emotional reaction.
- This is the logo for the APEC CEO summit for ONE year, hosted by THAILAND. It is NOT a WEF logo, or the logo of any permanent organization.
APEC = Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
- It is a logo developed by Thailand for THEIR hosting event. Each nation hosting APEC develops a unique logo, often one that reflect and highlights their cultural heritage. (Note the logos used by Peru, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, New Zealand)
Philippines APEC CEO Summit logo (2016)
Peru APEC CEO Summit logo (2016)
Viet Nam APEC CEO Summit logo (2017)
Papua New Guinea APEC CEO Summit logo (2018)
Chile APEC CEO Summit logo (2019)
Malaysia APEC CEO Summit logo (2020)
New Zealand APEC CEO Summit logo (2021)
Now in context:
Thailand APEC CEO Summit logo (2022)
Note the many other iterations on the broad backdrop of what appears to be a very thailand-ish motif.
Also:
Thai Folk Art
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/thai-folk-art-pattern-flower-shape-647023225
Some more Thai design/imagery
This logo will no longer be used after the summit is finished. Next year, the APEC CEO Summit will have a new logo. APEC CEO SUmmit 2023 is scheduled to be held...... in the USA.
While we know that the Cabal behind the WEF has worked to infiltrate all institutions, and we can be confident that APEC is one of those, it seems to me that it's an irrational leap to somehow conflate the logo for the APEC 2022 CEO summit with some new symbol Klaus Schwab is establishing. Maybe, but its a big leap and far more likely simply the expression of ignorance on the part of Westerners who don't really know anything about the history and culture of the East or of Thailand itself.
While the USA 2023 Summit logo does have echos of the swastika, over-estimation of the impact of this (it's a temporary EVENT logo that will be shelved the following year) combined with a lack of research and context, a smattering of ignorance, fueled by emotional leaps - this approach really does NOT serve the Q agenda, imo.
By the way, here's a few neat pics of your favorite President addressing the APEC CEO Summit in Vietnam, 2017.
Yep, anyone traveling through India our south east Asia, unless they were aware of cultural differences would be flat out shocked by the amount of swastikas.
Their eeeeeeverywhere.
The Nazis stole an ancient symbol with no correlation to their cause and made it demonic to western eyes. I cannot blame people in the East for ignoring the Nazi bastardization of their own symbol.
Similar to how the gay and dick chop off community has ruined rainbows for everyone in the West.
This. Satan loves to steal and degrade. He cannot create. Only pervert.
Thanks for clearing this up.
Just about everyone knows that the Nazis didn't introduce the swastika.
That's not the point. Multiple meanings exist.
Correct. That's not the point. The point is, its a real reach to label the symbol a swastika, and a bigger reach to assert that somehow Klaus Schwab introduced or is using this symbol for the new WEF One World Government project.
That's not the point either. People pointed this out because it's Klaus Schwab standing under a friggin swastika. It could definitely be a loud dog whistle.
Kids and stuffed bears with panda eyes aren't always symbols of pedophilia either, but Balenciaga is sure taking heat over it right now.
Ah, OK. I only saw the GAW post (which does not show Schwab). I'll admit, looking at the original tweet, it's kind a .... ironic.
Schwab in front of what looks like a swastika. Which it isn't (it's going in the opposite direction).
But then, what do you make of the context? Considering all the logos, and the fact that this logo is a one-off thing.
The Balenciaga things completely different, imo.
I suppose. I don't see much significance in it myself, but we're just dealing with opinions here.
I don't put much value in it either. Just something to go "hm" at. Glad it was posted here so I could hm at it.
I have to admit, I have a bias. I tend to see such emotionally charged conclusions (as expressed by some of the commentators in the original post) by a lot of pedes to be less than diligent in the application of Q's principles.
I guess all anons are different, but I do think (my opinion) that some anons place WAY too much emphasis on the symbolism factor, to the extent that they see the symbols everywhere, I mean everywhere. And, I think that can be counter-productive.
But possibly, its just one area that doesn't resonate with my thinking, and I'm wrong or don't see the connections. In my stock and trade, context is CRITICAL to evaluating ANY meaning, and I think sometimes meaning that isn't there can be extracted because the observer isn't taking sufficient notice or isn't sufficiently contextualizing the information.
Agree generally. We could make some formula for it.
requisite attention = (probability of signal vs noise) * (impact if true)
Both variables are low here, so imo, low attention is called for. The symbol is likely benign and even if not, its low impact because we already know Klaus is a baddie.
But I do think it's good to avoid mistakenly assigning a zero value to things like this. Requisite attention is nonzero here, but still very low, imo.
Hmmmm.... That's interesting.
Application of this sort of approach seems solid. What got me, however, was folks saying that Schwab was releasing the new NWO symbol! I mean, that's just ....
If the issue could be raised, discussed and looked at without all the noise, then it would be productive and certainly valuable. No problem is questioning, in that case.
Agreed.
However, one thing I am constantly concerned about is the signal vs noise ratio WITHIN the Great Awakening, such as what manifests on this board, in any given post, or on Telegram, or elsewhere. The more noise, the less signal for normies to pick up and benefit from, and less signal for anons to build the information victory with.
So when someone goes off emotionally charged, misapplying logic or reasoning, and all sort of noise ideas are generated and then promulgated, that's a problem. I think anons would do well to consider limiting that sort of phenomenon to be a central part of our work.
People love jumping to conclusions without research
Seven Years in Tibet was a propagandisitic twist of a movie about how Colonel Heinrich Harrer mentored the nazi program with Tibetans on the plan to create a new world religion with the Dalai Lama as its head, after using Tibet as a political fulcrum against/between China and India.
After measuring skulls to see if they were 'Aryan', it was determined that they were, and thereby a legitimate candidate for the plan.
The claim that Harrer was a 'mountaineer' is cover for the purpose of the visit.
The Tibetans were told 'they wuz kangs' and would rule the world from Shangri-la.
The Dalai Lama was given new dominance....PICKED rather than selected by tradition (rigged election), given unicorn theosophic history/cosmology after being told they correspond to each other. Their own WWG1WGA.
This created the necessary political turmoil, so the CIA brought the Dalai Lama, his brother Norbu, and Henrich Mueller into the United States, going to Indiana University (Norbu/Mueller) where there was built nearby, the only Tibetan stupa in the U.S. The stupa holds relics and is considered a foundation.
From Mueller we got genetic fruit fly experiments.
Same school gave us B.F. Skinner and behavioral experiments with rats.
Alfred Kinsey - Ever hear that name? His mentor was Aleister Crowley, who's satanic bible resides near the Gutenberg bible in the Lily (drugs) Library, next to a replica of the reichstag building.
What could go wrong with a plan to control religion and genetics in a New World Order? What did everyone say when I would try to go into this story?
Future proves the past
The University incorporated the swastika into tiling in a couple of buildings and the criticism was deflected by a disclaimer plaque stating that the swastika was an ancient symbol going the other direction.
No class offered the facts behind the co-option of the symbol nor the secret connivings of the people behind the attempt to appropriate it.
Roman parades might be 'harmless' depending on who's giving one and why, but to claim that all Roman parades by politicians are harmless and innocent because it's an old practice is neglecting the finer points of the issues involved.
An interdasting comment.
If the movie was propagandistic, are you saying the book written by Harrer was as well?
What kinda saucey sauces do you have for these ideas?
Indiana Uni archives state that John H Mueller was born in Missouri and was a Prof at Indiana for 30 years starting from 1935.
https://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/findingaids/view?doc.view=entire_text&docId=InU-Ar-VAA2645
Norbu apparently lived in Bloomington, but what other connections are there with the university?
The Muller of fruit fly experiments is Hermann J Muller, who was apparently born in New York in 1890. He returned to the US in 1940. He became a prof at Indiana Univ in 1945.
https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/hermann-joseph-muller-1890-1967
Apparently, the Dalai Lama fled Tibet in 1959. That's a long time after 1945. He apparently then set up residence in Dharamshala, India.
According to some reports, the swastikas at Indiana Univ. where put down in 1917. Before the Nazis stole the symbol. Apparently located with other tiles with other symbols from other cultures.
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2019/07/09/indiana-university-officials-remove-swastikas-inside-campus-building/1682320001/
Of course, maybe all of that is smoke screen, but then where does one find concrete sauce for the other narrative?
Yes....all 'that' is smoke screen. I've heard it all, believe me.
The university had to jump through legal hoops to bring in Mueller because of his nazi background. His 'knowledge of ancient languages' being the premise for his need. I would suggest this was used in a Sitchin type situation where language is mangled to fit the agenda(s).
The fast "metamorphasis" of the fruit fly allowed for a window into future genetic manipulation.
The Symbols were placed in the mid thirties. "Biddle Continuation" money. See Nicholas Biddle
Herman Wells, the chancellor was arrested and deported from Germany for looting just after WW II in Berlin. He was appointed Education Minister. Stole paintings and other art items. Old newspaper clips. Barely mentioned of course. it was embarrassing.
like all the rest
Half the German body of literature of the time is in the library's card catalog. Most public available is microfilm and not exactly publicly available. Do you read German? Some is outright scrubbed as I discovered, lack of knowledge as to 'whereabouts'.
Wells really enjoyed dressing as Santa (sp) every year with kids in his lap. Being a lover of children, it would have been an easy decent thing to concede to critics within the 'conservative' region and remove the pedophie-enabler he'd brought in as professor of research on baby diddling, but he defended Alfred Kinsey's job like it was his own.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=kinsey+pedophile
All sorts of sauce/bread recipes, but it still depends on the cook/baker.
We'd have to get together over covfefe and tell special sauce stories for you to see the bridge of it.
Thanks 2eyes.
Ok, cool. I'll just park this in the 'heard that' box then. More to FOCUS on right now.
But thanks for the info.
Exactly that, all good. Just see it as another few pieces fitting into the picture on the lid of the box.
carry on fren
Perception is truth, If I were anyone, I would not be photographed under that symbol.
Well, you ARE someone! And praise God you are free to not be photographed!
Myself, I lived in North-East Asia for 16 years, studied literature and history and art in a few Far Eastern nations.
I'd have zero qualms about being photographed under or near this symbol.
they shit all over trump for "over feeding" coy fish in asia. If he was in front of that symbol back then, holy cow the shit would fly.
I don't think so.
Symbolism is everywhere, so is satan, don't be decieved.
And yet, so is God. So, does it behoove one to focus on satan, or on God? God designed the first 5 star shape. It's called a starfish.
Symbolism is merely the utilization of form to convey and embed meaning. it can be used for good or for evil, just as people can be good or evil.
Evil happens when the good and true things created by God are perverted and twisted by a thief who originally did not own them.
Maybe the Thais did it on purpose... to show the word