This was posted quite a while back. It was not an actual child sacrifice but because that was a part of their history it was included in the narrative. There was an interesting newspaper article that I found online with information on the event that I posted back then.
I did not see the previous posting, nor your comment. I don't know whether it was a real or pretend child sacrifice, but they went to a lot of trouble to make sure to include it in their festivities at perhaps great expense.
If it was meant to be a bad thing, why did all the people continue to dance and sing and act like it was a good thing? If they were denouncing it, why did we not see the crowd trying to stop the man, or attack him or drag him away? We did not see any such thing.
I also did a cursory search about the event and every article mentions almost the identical information, and nowhere do the articles mention that they portrayed child sacrifice in the festivities or that it was a denouncing of past satanic worship.
It seems to me, they clearly avoided the subject in all of the sanitized articles that followed the event.
This video is very misleading. The child sacrifice part was from an old horror movie...not from the Chicago event. It's not difficult to tell the editing and difference in the film quality, that it's from at least two different sources.
I didn't save any of the links when this video first came out a few months back, and was shared EVERYWHERE ad nauseum. Others posted the fact checks, but, as I pointed out, it's very easy to see that the child sacrifice part did not take place on the same stage as the Chicago celebration.
There were many early-20th century horror movies that have been lost to time, which sensationalized this kind of thing. Even if the movie can't exactly be identified, it behooves us to be sure of what we are re-posting/sharing instead of leaving hanging innuendos. We just can't leave ourselves vulnerable to being discredited.
According to Weisgal, the Jews of Chicago had been asked to participate in the World's Fair. Negotiations went on for months as to whether the Jews were a race, a religion, or a nation; and if so, could they be represented by a building; and if a building, what kind of building? After the success of his 1932 Chanukah pageant, Weisgal felt inspired: "not a building, not an exhibit, but a pageant portraying five thousand years of Jewish history. It would have everything-religion, history, the longing for Zion, the return to Zion, and it would be called The Romance of a People." Weisgal went to Rabbi Solomon Goldman and Judge Harry Fisher, two of Chicago's Zionist leaders and received their support. Weisgal, according to his own account, went to see Rufus C. Dawes, President of the Fair, a deeply religious man who loved his Bible. Weisgal was able to convince him that Jews had "four thousand years of history, from Abraham down to the present: that no one has!" Dawes agreed to schedule a special Jewish Day at the Fair, the grand finale of which would be a huge spectacle produced by Meyer Weisgal
It says 4000 years of history which included sacrifices to Moloch...it's in the OT. It was a sweeping historical panorama...I wouldn't have included that but it is part of the good, the bad and the ugly.
My grandfather-in-law was driving through there with a couple of his friends from the East Coast when they were all about 19, and they camped there at that exact time, and in the journal he wrote, which we have the handwritten original, he said there was a typhoon that went through there and it flooded Chicago.
This was posted quite a while back. It was not an actual child sacrifice but because that was a part of their history it was included in the narrative. There was an interesting newspaper article that I found online with information on the event that I posted back then.
Correct.
I did not see the previous posting, nor your comment. I don't know whether it was a real or pretend child sacrifice, but they went to a lot of trouble to make sure to include it in their festivities at perhaps great expense.
If it was meant to be a bad thing, why did all the people continue to dance and sing and act like it was a good thing? If they were denouncing it, why did we not see the crowd trying to stop the man, or attack him or drag him away? We did not see any such thing.
I also did a cursory search about the event and every article mentions almost the identical information, and nowhere do the articles mention that they portrayed child sacrifice in the festivities or that it was a denouncing of past satanic worship.
It seems to me, they clearly avoided the subject in all of the sanitized articles that followed the event.
This video is very misleading. The child sacrifice part was from an old horror movie...not from the Chicago event. It's not difficult to tell the editing and difference in the film quality, that it's from at least two different sources.
Which movie? How can you say this for a fact? Please clarify if you can.
I didn't save any of the links when this video first came out a few months back, and was shared EVERYWHERE ad nauseum. Others posted the fact checks, but, as I pointed out, it's very easy to see that the child sacrifice part did not take place on the same stage as the Chicago celebration.
There were many early-20th century horror movies that have been lost to time, which sensationalized this kind of thing. Even if the movie can't exactly be identified, it behooves us to be sure of what we are re-posting/sharing instead of leaving hanging innuendos. We just can't leave ourselves vulnerable to being discredited.
If I've posted in error, I'll remove it. But so far, it appears to be valid to my eyes.
According to Weisgal, the Jews of Chicago had been asked to participate in the World's Fair. Negotiations went on for months as to whether the Jews were a race, a religion, or a nation; and if so, could they be represented by a building; and if a building, what kind of building? After the success of his 1932 Chanukah pageant, Weisgal felt inspired: "not a building, not an exhibit, but a pageant portraying five thousand years of Jewish history. It would have everything-religion, history, the longing for Zion, the return to Zion, and it would be called The Romance of a People." Weisgal went to Rabbi Solomon Goldman and Judge Harry Fisher, two of Chicago's Zionist leaders and received their support. Weisgal, according to his own account, went to see Rufus C. Dawes, President of the Fair, a deeply religious man who loved his Bible. Weisgal was able to convince him that Jews had "four thousand years of history, from Abraham down to the present: that no one has!" Dawes agreed to schedule a special Jewish Day at the Fair, the grand finale of which would be a huge spectacle produced by Meyer Weisgal
Yes, I read that myself before I posted. Nowhere does it talk about child sacrifice and worshiping Moloch/Molech does it.
It says 4000 years of history which included sacrifices to Moloch...it's in the OT. It was a sweeping historical panorama...I wouldn't have included that but it is part of the good, the bad and the ugly.
References:
Old video from 1933: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvJWOqKCAwg
Additional way to view the old video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ea4SlZSayHL3/
Article about the celebration: https://interactive.wttw.com/a/chicago-stories-jewish-chicago-1833-1933
Thank you.
I really appreciate all these info.
Saying that the re-enactment of Molech is a celebration of child sacrifice is like saying Robert E Lee statues celebrate slavery.
Let's not use the same distorted logic the left uses.
I don't see that the two comport.
They both acknowledge their own history.
My grandfather-in-law was driving through there with a couple of his friends from the East Coast when they were all about 19, and they camped there at that exact time, and in the journal he wrote, which we have the handwritten original, he said there was a typhoon that went through there and it flooded Chicago.
Awesome!
Oh that krazy Kabballah.
I think I saw Kanye in there!