"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." People don't look closely enough at the FIRST part of the sentence.
Liberals claim it's meant to keep the civilian army regulated, but during that time a well regulated militia meant one that was in working order and functional.
What the deepstate absolutely doesn't want, is people invoking the 2A provisions against them. So they lie and say "oh if you do that, you're just playing into their hands." That's untrue. More and more people here are waking up to the passivism psyop that is Q. I'm sure that around the 2024 election theft, people will be completely woke here. Some will probably say JB is a white hate. Lol
At the time of the American Revolutionary War, militias were groups of able-bodied men who protected their towns, colonies, and eventually states. When the Constitution was drafted, the militia was a state-based institution. States were responsible for organizing this.
Well-regulated in the 18th century tended to be something like well-organized, well-armed, well-disciplined. It didn't mean 'regulation' in the sense that we use it now, in that it's not about the regulatory state. There's been nuance there. It means the militia was in an effective shape to fight.
In other words, it didn't mean the state was controlling the militia in a certain way, but rather that the militia was prepared to do its duty.
The framers definitely believed in natural rights -- that they are endowed by a creator. They believed we are born into a state of nature before we form governments, and that we are endowed with certain fundamental rights.
The entire purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to directly prohibit government from infringing in an way with our preexisting right to bear arms. It also put government on notice that we have the right to defend ourselves with weapons from any government tyranny. We our the power behind government, no the other way around.
So refreshing to hear someone else call out q for a pacifism op. Regardless of the intent, that is the obvious effect in this reality.
Those who would otherwise act, are waiting for “the plan”.
Sad.
well this story is from NZ, so can't really instigate the violence you yearn for with this article. You are glowing so brightly handshake, is this ray epps?
So easily you forget recent history. 109 nations all locked down from Covid at the same time, Canada, Germany, Austria, Australia and New Zealand all pushed their “public safety” lockdowns to the extreme.
What happens there, is a precursor to what will happen here, if we let it.
You are not seeing, or thinking clearly, and your poorly shaped assessment is a detriment to understanding the landscape. You are contributing to the fog, not lifting it.
Its a psyop but it is also the truth. At least for the moment the "terrorist" narrative falls flat on its face because there are no instances to spin, besides, moving to somewhere like Texas or another red state is doable and not being a cuck. I am prepared to make hard financial decisions in the times ahead if certain things happen where I live, as should we all.
They blame all "mass shootings" on Trump supporters, even hoping that every one is indeed a Trump supporter, then when it turns out that person is not a Trump supporter, they either don't issue a retraction, or when they do, it's kept quiet. The obvious problem is the normies are fucking retarded, so they believe everything the TV says.
Fake psyop lie!
They don't need violence to slander us as terrorists. Look around. They are doing it anyways. So why go down like a cuck?
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." People don't look closely enough at the FIRST part of the sentence.
I've been saying that any level of police would infiltrate a beer bowling league - a bunch of people that get together and drink when bowling.
The FBI sent a spook to my family Christmas party. I called him out as being a spook.
Turned out my sister husband was a real terrorist.
Amen my fellow frogman. You are 100,000 million correct, with our Father as my witness!.
Short, succint, truth. These-----oh poo, im puffed up, quiet time.
Exactly.
Liberals claim it's meant to keep the civilian army regulated, but during that time a well regulated militia meant one that was in working order and functional.
What the deepstate absolutely doesn't want, is people invoking the 2A provisions against them. So they lie and say "oh if you do that, you're just playing into their hands." That's untrue. More and more people here are waking up to the passivism psyop that is Q. I'm sure that around the 2024 election theft, people will be completely woke here. Some will probably say JB is a white hate. Lol
At the time of the American Revolutionary War, militias were groups of able-bodied men who protected their towns, colonies, and eventually states. When the Constitution was drafted, the militia was a state-based institution. States were responsible for organizing this.
Well-regulated in the 18th century tended to be something like well-organized, well-armed, well-disciplined. It didn't mean 'regulation' in the sense that we use it now, in that it's not about the regulatory state. There's been nuance there. It means the militia was in an effective shape to fight.
In other words, it didn't mean the state was controlling the militia in a certain way, but rather that the militia was prepared to do its duty.
The framers definitely believed in natural rights -- that they are endowed by a creator. They believed we are born into a state of nature before we form governments, and that we are endowed with certain fundamental rights.
The entire purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to directly prohibit government from infringing in an way with our preexisting right to bear arms. It also put government on notice that we have the right to defend ourselves with weapons from any government tyranny. We our the power behind government, no the other way around.
So refreshing to hear someone else call out q for a pacifism op. Regardless of the intent, that is the obvious effect in this reality.
Those who would otherwise act, are waiting for “the plan”. Sad.
well this story is from NZ, so can't really instigate the violence you yearn for with this article. You are glowing so brightly handshake, is this ray epps?
Probably not glowies... can be easily explained as poor reading comprehension by idiots, missing the part about these events occurring in New Zealand.
History will add NZ to the long list of democide countries that implemented strict gun control just before slaughtering their own citizens
So easily you forget recent history. 109 nations all locked down from Covid at the same time, Canada, Germany, Austria, Australia and New Zealand all pushed their “public safety” lockdowns to the extreme.
What happens there, is a precursor to what will happen here, if we let it. You are not seeing, or thinking clearly, and your poorly shaped assessment is a detriment to understanding the landscape. You are contributing to the fog, not lifting it.
You’re probably college educated right?
so you are saying do some violence. The handshake i was respomding too is a glowie trying to incite violence. Is that we you are here for too, cuck?
Its a psyop but it is also the truth. At least for the moment the "terrorist" narrative falls flat on its face because there are no instances to spin, besides, moving to somewhere like Texas or another red state is doable and not being a cuck. I am prepared to make hard financial decisions in the times ahead if certain things happen where I live, as should we all.
They blame all "mass shootings" on Trump supporters, even hoping that every one is indeed a Trump supporter, then when it turns out that person is not a Trump supporter, they either don't issue a retraction, or when they do, it's kept quiet. The obvious problem is the normies are fucking retarded, so they believe everything the TV says.
you are glowing so brightly. everyone can see you.