Richard Feynman was not a fraud. He was a physicist and a brilliant man. He led an interesting and somewhat controversial life. He was not perfect, no one is. But with Feynman what you see is what you get. IMHO we need more (many more) like him. BTW what is gravity, exactly??
Sheeptard! Maybe so, But, I studied during Feynman's time and he was a man who always questioned everything. He would argue his side of the proposition, but if you were prepared and refuted his position, he would consider your argument. That, by the way, is science. So, try me, what the hell is gravity, exactly?
Having had the good fortune to meet the bongo player on several occasions, trust me when I say that is a load of crap. You come off like a 6-year-old downs tard critiquing Tesla.
Agreed. He was one of the key members of the Manhattan Project (a young prodigy at the time). He also did some good work with neural networks (Thinking Machines) in the 80's.
He had a good life. He led a life of significance, in multiple fields. I am trying, to a much lesser degree, to do the same.
Morons are gonna moron. It's what they do. People like that are nothing more than dancing clowns... a distraction from the things in life that really matter.
The best possible response is - no response. Any response is simply a waste of time, as you have probably already noticed.
Instead, we need to ignore distractions and use our time to focus on the things (and people) that DO matter, in order that we may continue to learn and improve... as we try our best not to accidentally become one of the dancing clowns ourselves.
Did you read the book?? IMHO it was the story of a brilliant, eccentric man who questioned everything and adhered to the scientific principle. You may not like him, but he led a life of adventure. We should all try to be like that...
Yes, I read it back in the 1980s. It was a gift from the Tau Beta Pi Honor Society for admission in their society. There's little to nothing I remember of it though. I regret to say, I recall it being rather boorish.
The down-votes for my opinion is amazing. It seems I have no right to take a different direction from the herd and take a different path? Wow, get along lil' doggies. There's only one path. Now, take it!
So you're the down-voter. I suppose it is your right to do so, but definitely not for your premise though. I thank you for responding. However, unfortunately your response sits at the very bottom of Graham's Hierarchy of Argument. 'Name calling' is pathetic and goes against the rules. GAW strives for its members to be at the upper level of this hierarchy. I suggest you read and understand them.
You mentioned Feynman was "one of mainstream's darlings". It wouldn't be for the same reason Carl Sagan, Albert Einstein, or even a Amy Schumer or Seth Rogan are promoted? A colleague of mine worked several years with Carl Sagan and said he is a "big fake", an "actor" who stole the headlines of the work others did. He was never even involved in the projects. He too publicly was endeared by mainstream television because of his ((karma))).
We are the news. Not the lying propaganda mainstream. A long time ago, decades ago before 'Q' made publicity, I was discerning "mainstream darlings". Feynman was one of them to which I questioned his promotion and his celebritiness.
As a kid I read all his books and really admired the guy.
After waking up, I have this rule of thumb - any one who is popularised in mainstream is a Cabal asset - not necessarily a witting one, but an asset nevertheless.
Applying this rule, Feynman seems to be the same as well - buy did he get pushed hard in the mainstream.
So for me the real question that matters is - what was the core lie that Feynman helped push ( or what was the core objective in pushing him) ?
I am thinking he was needed to reinforce all the quantum physics lies they had been pushing via Einstein and co. However, would love to hear other theories.
In fairness, Einstein (although being used as a puppet and backed by prominent Zionists) was on the right track. Regrettably he died before Benoit Mandelbrot revealed the fractal. Einstein would have no doubt figured out ‘unified theory’ with this missing piece of the puzzle.
It never ceases to amaze me how you ALWAYS get downvoted on here when you speak the truth.
Go ahead and hate me but some day you people will wake up and realize you were programmed to react to certain truths and in a certain way.
This is the power of the brainwashing, the sheep are out there policing themselves. The good news is many are awakening. I laugh at myself, I was the same… I think back to topics I defended vehemently… it’s the system, the entire f ing system!!!
Anyways, keep on defending Feynman, science-ism, and his ilk like the good little sheep you have been programmed and groomed to be. It’s all good :)
LMAO Feynman is a fraud like so many of his generation. There’s a great video where he is asked what gravity is… and he can’t answer the question.
Anyways…
please wake up
Richard Feynman was not a fraud. He was a physicist and a brilliant man. He led an interesting and somewhat controversial life. He was not perfect, no one is. But with Feynman what you see is what you get. IMHO we need more (many more) like him. BTW what is gravity, exactly??
Sheeptard! Maybe so, But, I studied during Feynman's time and he was a man who always questioned everything. He would argue his side of the proposition, but if you were prepared and refuted his position, he would consider your argument. That, by the way, is science. So, try me, what the hell is gravity, exactly?
Here is your hero’s answer:
https://youtu.be/36GT2zI8lVA
Sounds like a fraud to me.
I think the mechanism of gravity is famously difficult to understand by scientists. A fraud would pretend to know exactly what it is.
Having had the good fortune to meet the bongo player on several occasions, trust me when I say that is a load of crap. You come off like a 6-year-old downs tard critiquing Tesla.
Agreed. He was one of the key members of the Manhattan Project (a young prodigy at the time). He also did some good work with neural networks (Thinking Machines) in the 80's.
He had a good life. He led a life of significance, in multiple fields. I am trying, to a much lesser degree, to do the same.
He was likely a legit 180 IQ. Both funny and a little sad to see folks who are still in double digits ridicule him.
Morons are gonna moron. It's what they do. People like that are nothing more than dancing clowns... a distraction from the things in life that really matter.
The best possible response is - no response. Any response is simply a waste of time, as you have probably already noticed.
Instead, we need to ignore distractions and use our time to focus on the things (and people) that DO matter, in order that we may continue to learn and improve... as we try our best not to accidentally become one of the dancing clowns ourselves.
Quite right. "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman!" I was never 'big' on Richard Feynman.
Did you read the book?? IMHO it was the story of a brilliant, eccentric man who questioned everything and adhered to the scientific principle. You may not like him, but he led a life of adventure. We should all try to be like that...
Yes, I read it back in the 1980s. It was a gift from the Tau Beta Pi Honor Society for admission in their society. There's little to nothing I remember of it though. I regret to say, I recall it being rather boorish.
Fair enough....
The down-votes for my opinion is amazing. It seems I have no right to take a different direction from the herd and take a different path? Wow, get along lil' doggies. There's only one path. Now, take it!
So you're the down-voter. I suppose it is your right to do so, but definitely not for your premise though. I thank you for responding. However, unfortunately your response sits at the very bottom of Graham's Hierarchy of Argument. 'Name calling' is pathetic and goes against the rules. GAW strives for its members to be at the upper level of this hierarchy. I suggest you read and understand them.
You mentioned Feynman was "one of mainstream's darlings". It wouldn't be for the same reason Carl Sagan, Albert Einstein, or even a Amy Schumer or Seth Rogan are promoted? A colleague of mine worked several years with Carl Sagan and said he is a "big fake", an "actor" who stole the headlines of the work others did. He was never even involved in the projects. He too publicly was endeared by mainstream television because of his ((karma))).
We are the news. Not the lying propaganda mainstream. A long time ago, decades ago before 'Q' made publicity, I was discerning "mainstream darlings". Feynman was one of them to which I questioned his promotion and his celebritiness.
The interview is probably still on YouTube. Literally, you will laugh.
As a kid I read all his books and really admired the guy.
After waking up, I have this rule of thumb - any one who is popularised in mainstream is a Cabal asset - not necessarily a witting one, but an asset nevertheless.
Applying this rule, Feynman seems to be the same as well - buy did he get pushed hard in the mainstream.
So for me the real question that matters is - what was the core lie that Feynman helped push ( or what was the core objective in pushing him) ?
I am thinking he was needed to reinforce all the quantum physics lies they had been pushing via Einstein and co. However, would love to hear other theories.
In fairness, Einstein (although being used as a puppet and backed by prominent Zionists) was on the right track. Regrettably he died before Benoit Mandelbrot revealed the fractal. Einstein would have no doubt figured out ‘unified theory’ with this missing piece of the puzzle.
It never ceases to amaze me how you ALWAYS get downvoted on here when you speak the truth.
Go ahead and hate me but some day you people will wake up and realize you were programmed to react to certain truths and in a certain way.
This is the power of the brainwashing, the sheep are out there policing themselves. The good news is many are awakening. I laugh at myself, I was the same… I think back to topics I defended vehemently… it’s the system, the entire f ing system!!!
Anyways, keep on defending Feynman, science-ism, and his ilk like the good little sheep you have been programmed and groomed to be. It’s all good :)
??? No, it’s the same account. I am Ringo.
Ahhhhh, Hahahahaha… see!!!! Speak a truth and get downvoted.
Me Ringo.
Here’s one:
END THE FED/ END THE WARS!!!